Neurocognitive Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Study with 12-Month Follow-Up.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tej D Azad, John F Burke, Anmol Warman, Justin K Scheer, Michael M Safaee, Terry Nguyen, Jaemin Kim, Marissa Fury, Justin Lee, Vedat Deviren, Christopher P Ames
{"title":"Neurocognitive Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Study with 12-Month Follow-Up.","authors":"Tej D Azad, John F Burke, Anmol Warman, Justin K Scheer, Michael M Safaee, Terry Nguyen, Jaemin Kim, Marissa Fury, Justin Lee, Vedat Deviren, Christopher P Ames","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>A common concern is that the stress induced by adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery may cause a post-operative decrease in cognitive function, especially in the elderly patients with some component of cognitive impairment. On the other hand, it is possible that ASD surgery could stabilize cognitive function by increasing activity and decreasing pain.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Here, we evaluate the effect of ASD surgery on cognitive outcome in a prospective study.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>This is a prospective study of patients undergoing ASD surgery at a single institution over a five-year period.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>ASD patients treated with posterior spinal fusion of greater or equal to 7 vertebral segments for adult deformity were included. Only patients with 12 month follow up are included in this study.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome variable was performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test of dementia and cognitive impairment, collected prospectively pre-operatively and at 12-month follow-up. We also collected outcome metrics including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22) with mental health (MH), activity (ACT), pain (P), and self-image (SI) sub-components. Pre-operative and post-operative morphine equivalent dose (MED) of narcotic medication was collected using patient surveys and verified using prescription data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was assessed using a paired t-test. Further analyses included performing univariate and multivariable analyses comparing patients with improved versus non-improved MoCA scores across demographic, radiographic, surgical, outcome data, and opioid usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 55 patients who met inclusion criteria. There was a significant increase in MoCA scores at 12-month follow-up compared to pre-operative MoCA scores (P < 0.001). Overall, 60% of patients exhibited an increase in MoCA scores, and 47.2% met minimally clinically important difference (MCID). More severely cognitively impaired patients tended to improve to a greater degree than less severely impaired patients (P = 0.003). While there was no clear association between reduction in postoperative opioid use and cognitive improvement, we observed a possible association between postoperative delirium and cognitive decline among patients with baseline cognitive impairment (P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our prospective data suggests that ASD surgery is associated with an improvement in cognitive function at one year follow-up. Further work is required to understand the drivers associated with cognitive improvement and worsening after ASD surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: A common concern is that the stress induced by adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery may cause a post-operative decrease in cognitive function, especially in the elderly patients with some component of cognitive impairment. On the other hand, it is possible that ASD surgery could stabilize cognitive function by increasing activity and decreasing pain.

Purpose: Here, we evaluate the effect of ASD surgery on cognitive outcome in a prospective study.

Study design/setting: This is a prospective study of patients undergoing ASD surgery at a single institution over a five-year period.

Patient sample: ASD patients treated with posterior spinal fusion of greater or equal to 7 vertebral segments for adult deformity were included. Only patients with 12 month follow up are included in this study.

Outcome measures: The primary outcome variable was performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test of dementia and cognitive impairment, collected prospectively pre-operatively and at 12-month follow-up. We also collected outcome metrics including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22) with mental health (MH), activity (ACT), pain (P), and self-image (SI) sub-components. Pre-operative and post-operative morphine equivalent dose (MED) of narcotic medication was collected using patient surveys and verified using prescription data.

Methods: The primary outcome was assessed using a paired t-test. Further analyses included performing univariate and multivariable analyses comparing patients with improved versus non-improved MoCA scores across demographic, radiographic, surgical, outcome data, and opioid usage.

Results: We enrolled 55 patients who met inclusion criteria. There was a significant increase in MoCA scores at 12-month follow-up compared to pre-operative MoCA scores (P < 0.001). Overall, 60% of patients exhibited an increase in MoCA scores, and 47.2% met minimally clinically important difference (MCID). More severely cognitively impaired patients tended to improve to a greater degree than less severely impaired patients (P = 0.003). While there was no clear association between reduction in postoperative opioid use and cognitive improvement, we observed a possible association between postoperative delirium and cognitive decline among patients with baseline cognitive impairment (P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Our prospective data suggests that ASD surgery is associated with an improvement in cognitive function at one year follow-up. Further work is required to understand the drivers associated with cognitive improvement and worsening after ASD surgery.

背景情况:一个普遍的担忧是,成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术引起的压力可能会导致术后认知功能下降,尤其是对存在一定认知障碍的老年患者而言。另一方面,成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术有可能通过增加活动量和减少疼痛来稳定认知功能。目的:在此,我们通过一项前瞻性研究评估了成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术对认知结果的影响:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是在一家医疗机构接受 ASD 手术治疗的患者,为期五年:患者样本:纳入因成人畸形而接受大于或等于7个椎体节段后路脊柱融合术治疗的ASD患者。本研究仅纳入随访12个月的患者:主要结果变量是蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)痴呆和认知障碍测试的表现,在术前和随访12个月时进行前瞻性收集。我们还收集了包括奥斯韦特里残疾指数(Oswestry Disability Index,ODI)、脊柱侧弯研究协会问卷(SRS-22)在内的结果指标,包括心理健康(MH)、活动(ACT)、疼痛(P)和自我形象(SI)等子项。通过患者调查收集术前和术后麻醉药物的吗啡当量剂量(MED),并通过处方数据进行核实:主要结果采用配对 t 检验进行评估。进一步的分析包括进行单变量和多变量分析,比较MoCA评分改善与未改善的患者在人口统计学、放射学、手术、结果数据和阿片类药物使用方面的差异:我们招募了 55 名符合纳入标准的患者。与术前的MoCA评分相比,随访12个月时的MoCA评分有明显提高(P < 0.001)。总体而言,60%的患者的MoCA评分有所提高,47.2%的患者达到了最小临床意义差异(MCID)。认知功能受损较严重的患者的改善程度往往高于受损较轻的患者(P = 0.003)。虽然术后阿片类药物用量的减少与认知能力的改善之间没有明显的关联,但我们观察到,在基线认知功能受损的患者中,术后谵妄与认知能力下降之间可能存在关联(P = 0.01):我们的前瞻性数据表明,ASD 手术与随访一年后认知功能的改善有关。还需要进一步研究,以了解与 ASD 手术后认知功能改善和恶化相关的驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信