Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nina Gobat, Catherine Slack, Stacey Hannah, Jessica Salzwedel, Georgia Bladon, Juan Garcia Burgos, Becky Purvis, Barbara Molony-Oates, Nandi Siegfried, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Magda Conway, Dorcas Kamuya, Alun Davies, Tian Johnson, Martha Tholanah, Stephen Mugamba, Naigaga Lillian Mutengu, Shingai Machingaidze, Lisa Schwartz, Lembit Rägo, Kai von Harbou
{"title":"Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice.","authors":"Nina Gobat, Catherine Slack, Stacey Hannah, Jessica Salzwedel, Georgia Bladon, Juan Garcia Burgos, Becky Purvis, Barbara Molony-Oates, Nandi Siegfried, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Magda Conway, Dorcas Kamuya, Alun Davies, Tian Johnson, Martha Tholanah, Stephen Mugamba, Naigaga Lillian Mutengu, Shingai Machingaidze, Lisa Schwartz, Lembit Rägo, Kai von Harbou","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00521-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In May 2022, member states of WHO adopted the World Health Assembly WHA75.8 resolution on strengthening clinical trials to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. The resolution recognises the central role of community stakeholders in the clinical trial ecosystem. This paper aims to take stock of the state of the field and define key actions from stakeholders across the clinical trial ecosystem for systematic engagement of patient, public, and community stakeholders in clinical trials. Upfront, sustained, inclusive, and meaningful engagement with patients, public, and community stakeholders intended to benefit from trial outcomes is crucial for several reasons. First, better engagement ensures that trials are well designed and well implemented by considering the unique perspectives and experiences of those they aim to benefit. Second, better engagement enhances the scientific, ethical, and pragmatic value of trials by improving the acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of trial design, implementation, and outcome dissemination. Lastly, improving engagement fosters trust in science and scientists, strengthens research literacy, and contributes to greater trust in research processes. This trust is particularly important in public health emergencies where the urgency for identifying effective interventions, including new vaccines and medicines, often results in limited engagement. In practice, engagement involves activities throughout the trial lifecycle, including research agenda setting, protocol development, trial conduct, and outcome dissemination. Key stakeholders, such as researchers, funders, research ethics committees, and regulators play crucial roles in enabling and implementing engagement via participatory practices. Despite some key markers of progress, challenges remain, including systemic gaps, limited engagement beyond tokenistic involvement, and structural inequities. Addressing these challenges requires action across the clinical trial ecosystem, including strengthening policies, enhancing funding mechanisms, improving regulatory oversight, advocacy, and education of all stakeholders about engagement, and promoting a strong culture of engagement. Advancing the agenda for engagement can promote trust, ethical research conduct, and improve outcomes and wider uptake of findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 4","pages":"e716-e731"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00521-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In May 2022, member states of WHO adopted the World Health Assembly WHA75.8 resolution on strengthening clinical trials to provide high-quality evidence on health interventions and to improve research quality and coordination. The resolution recognises the central role of community stakeholders in the clinical trial ecosystem. This paper aims to take stock of the state of the field and define key actions from stakeholders across the clinical trial ecosystem for systematic engagement of patient, public, and community stakeholders in clinical trials. Upfront, sustained, inclusive, and meaningful engagement with patients, public, and community stakeholders intended to benefit from trial outcomes is crucial for several reasons. First, better engagement ensures that trials are well designed and well implemented by considering the unique perspectives and experiences of those they aim to benefit. Second, better engagement enhances the scientific, ethical, and pragmatic value of trials by improving the acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of trial design, implementation, and outcome dissemination. Lastly, improving engagement fosters trust in science and scientists, strengthens research literacy, and contributes to greater trust in research processes. This trust is particularly important in public health emergencies where the urgency for identifying effective interventions, including new vaccines and medicines, often results in limited engagement. In practice, engagement involves activities throughout the trial lifecycle, including research agenda setting, protocol development, trial conduct, and outcome dissemination. Key stakeholders, such as researchers, funders, research ethics committees, and regulators play crucial roles in enabling and implementing engagement via participatory practices. Despite some key markers of progress, challenges remain, including systemic gaps, limited engagement beyond tokenistic involvement, and structural inequities. Addressing these challenges requires action across the clinical trial ecosystem, including strengthening policies, enhancing funding mechanisms, improving regulatory oversight, advocacy, and education of all stakeholders about engagement, and promoting a strong culture of engagement. Advancing the agenda for engagement can promote trust, ethical research conduct, and improve outcomes and wider uptake of findings.

更好的参与,更好的证据:在临床试验中与患者、公众和社区合作,参与和良好的参与性实践。
2022年5月,世卫组织会员国通过了世界卫生大会WHA75.8号关于加强临床试验以提供卫生干预措施的高质量证据并提高研究质量和协调的决议。该决议承认社区利益相关者在临床试验生态系统中的核心作用。本文旨在评估该领域的现状,并定义临床试验生态系统中利益相关者的关键行动,以便患者、公众和社区利益相关者系统地参与临床试验。为了从试验结果中获益,与患者、公众和社区利益相关者进行前瞻性、持续性、包容性和有意义的接触至关重要,原因如下。首先,更好的参与确保通过考虑试验目标受益者的独特观点和经验来设计和实施试验。其次,通过提高试验设计、实施和结果传播的可接受性、可行性和相关性,更好的参与可以增强试验的科学、伦理和实用价值。最后,提高参与度可以促进对科学和科学家的信任,加强研究素养,并有助于提高对研究过程的信任。这种信任在突发公共卫生事件中尤其重要,因为迫切需要确定有效的干预措施,包括新疫苗和药物,往往导致参与有限。在实践中,参与涉及整个试验生命周期的活动,包括研究议程设置、方案制定、试验实施和结果传播。关键利益相关者,如研究人员、资助者、研究伦理委员会和监管机构,在通过参与式实践实现和实施参与方面发挥着关键作用。尽管取得了一些关键的进展,但挑战依然存在,包括系统性差距、象征性参与之外的有限参与以及结构性不平等。应对这些挑战需要整个临床试验生态系统采取行动,包括加强政策、加强筹资机制、改善监管监督、宣传和对所有利益攸关方的参与教育,以及促进强大的参与文化。推进参与议程可以促进信任和合乎道德的研究行为,并改善成果和更广泛地接受研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信