{"title":"Geographic Distribution of Racial Differences in Renal Cell Carcinoma Mortality","authors":"Xiaoxian Liu , Chengqian Shi , Bin Han , Jie Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To examine the geographic variations in Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) -specific death disparities from competing causes among Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander RCC patients. RCC outcomes in specific racial/ethnic population warrants further research and it is unknown whether racial/ethnic differences in RCC survival vary geographically within the US.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess all RCC patients from 2014 to 2021. Data was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was RCC-related mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 85,975 patients with RCC from 16 geographic areas within the SEER database. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that Hispanic patients had the worst survival outcome (<em>P</em> < .001 by log rank test). In the multivariable competing-risks regression, Hispanics had a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% CI, 1.20-1.38, <em>P</em> ˂ .001) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. The increase in the risk of RCC-related death with Hispanic race/ethnicity was consistent across all major subgroups stratified by the covariables. In stratified analyses of geographic regions, there were 3 areas in which Hispanics had worse RCC-specific survival (Los Angeles: HR 1.22, 95% CI, 1.06-1.41, <em>P</em> = .005; Greater California: HR 1.125, 95% CI, 1.15-1.37, <em>P</em> < .001; Atlanta, Georgia: HR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.32-2.88, <em>P</em> = .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These results demonstrate that population-level variations in RCC survival among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites were associated with a small number of geographic regions. Targeted interventions in these regions may be conducive to alleviating RCC care differences at the national level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"23 3","pages":"Article 102324"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767325000254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To examine the geographic variations in Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) -specific death disparities from competing causes among Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Asian/Pacific Islander RCC patients. RCC outcomes in specific racial/ethnic population warrants further research and it is unknown whether racial/ethnic differences in RCC survival vary geographically within the US.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess all RCC patients from 2014 to 2021. Data was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was RCC-related mortality.
Results
The study included 85,975 patients with RCC from 16 geographic areas within the SEER database. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that Hispanic patients had the worst survival outcome (P < .001 by log rank test). In the multivariable competing-risks regression, Hispanics had a higher risk of cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95% CI, 1.20-1.38, P ˂ .001) compared with non-Hispanic Whites. The increase in the risk of RCC-related death with Hispanic race/ethnicity was consistent across all major subgroups stratified by the covariables. In stratified analyses of geographic regions, there were 3 areas in which Hispanics had worse RCC-specific survival (Los Angeles: HR 1.22, 95% CI, 1.06-1.41, P = .005; Greater California: HR 1.125, 95% CI, 1.15-1.37, P < .001; Atlanta, Georgia: HR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.32-2.88, P = .001).
Conclusion
These results demonstrate that population-level variations in RCC survival among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Whites were associated with a small number of geographic regions. Targeted interventions in these regions may be conducive to alleviating RCC care differences at the national level.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.