Jing Lu , Dehu Dou , Yawen Wang , Jiaao Shu , Zhiqi Lei , Yan Huo , Xinjiang Gong
{"title":"Enhanced pre- and postnatal developmental toxicity (ePPND) study in non-human primates: Necessity, strategic approaches, and critical considerations","authors":"Jing Lu , Dehu Dou , Yawen Wang , Jiaao Shu , Zhiqi Lei , Yan Huo , Xinjiang Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nonclinical developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies are crucial components of novel drug development, as they identify reproductive and developmental risks and ensure drug safety in populations such as pregnant women and women of childbearing potential (WOCBP). Rodents or rabbits are commonly used in nonclinical studies to evaluate DART for chemical compounds. However, for most antibody-based biopharmaceuticals, non-human primates (NHPs) are the only pharmacologically relevant species, necessitating the use of NHPs in DART studies. These studies pose significant challenges due to stringent design requirements, complex protocols, prolonged timelines, and high costs. A single well-designed NHP study, in which the test substance is administered from gestational day 20 until delivery (enhanced Pre- and Postnatal Developmental study, ePPND study), is preferable to conducting separate Embryo-Fetal Developmental (EFD) and Pre- and Postnatal Developmental (PPND) studies. This review highlights the scientific rationale for NHP-based ePPND studies as mandated by major regulatory agencies, discusses advanced methodologies, key challenges (including endpoint selection, experimental design optimization, and data interpretation with case examples), and offers guidance for ePPND design across antibody-based therapeutics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 105814"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025000443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nonclinical developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies are crucial components of novel drug development, as they identify reproductive and developmental risks and ensure drug safety in populations such as pregnant women and women of childbearing potential (WOCBP). Rodents or rabbits are commonly used in nonclinical studies to evaluate DART for chemical compounds. However, for most antibody-based biopharmaceuticals, non-human primates (NHPs) are the only pharmacologically relevant species, necessitating the use of NHPs in DART studies. These studies pose significant challenges due to stringent design requirements, complex protocols, prolonged timelines, and high costs. A single well-designed NHP study, in which the test substance is administered from gestational day 20 until delivery (enhanced Pre- and Postnatal Developmental study, ePPND study), is preferable to conducting separate Embryo-Fetal Developmental (EFD) and Pre- and Postnatal Developmental (PPND) studies. This review highlights the scientific rationale for NHP-based ePPND studies as mandated by major regulatory agencies, discusses advanced methodologies, key challenges (including endpoint selection, experimental design optimization, and data interpretation with case examples), and offers guidance for ePPND design across antibody-based therapeutics.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)