Acute stress enhances synaptic plasticity in male mice via a microbiota-dependent mechanism

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Cristina Rosell-Cardona , Michael K. Collins , Kenneth J. O'Riordan , Michael S. Goodson , Nancy Kelley-Loughnane , John F. Cryan , Gerard Clarke
{"title":"Acute stress enhances synaptic plasticity in male mice via a microbiota-dependent mechanism","authors":"Cristina Rosell-Cardona ,&nbsp;Michael K. Collins ,&nbsp;Kenneth J. O'Riordan ,&nbsp;Michael S. Goodson ,&nbsp;Nancy Kelley-Loughnane ,&nbsp;John F. Cryan ,&nbsp;Gerard Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Acute stress can enhance or impair synaptic plasticity depending on the nature, duration, and type of stress exposure as well as the brain region examined. The absence of a gut microbiome can also alter hippocampal plasticity. However, the possible interplay between synaptic plasticity, acute stress, and the gut microbiota remains unknown. Here, we examine this interaction and determine whether the gut microbiota impacts stress-induced alterations in hippocampal plasticity. Further, we explored whether exposure to the microbial metabolite butyrate is sufficient to counteract stress-induced alterations in synaptic plasticity. We used electrophysiological and molecular experiments in adult male C57/BL6 antibiotic-treated and acutely stressed mice.</div><div>In electrophysiological experiments we treated hippocampal slices with 3 μM sodium butyrate to explore the effect of this microbial metabolite. We found the presence of the microbiota essential for the enhancement of both short- and long-term potentiation induced by 15 min of acute restraint stress. Furthermore, butyrate exposure effectively restored the stress-induced enhancement of potentiation in slices from microbiome-depleted animals while also enhancing long-term potentiation independent of stress. In addition, alterations of hippocampal synaptic plasticity markers were noted.</div><div>Our findings highlight a critical new temporal role for gut-derived metabolites in defining the impact of acute stress on synaptic plasticity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19139,"journal":{"name":"Neuropharmacology","volume":"273 ","pages":"Article 110434"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028390825001406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute stress can enhance or impair synaptic plasticity depending on the nature, duration, and type of stress exposure as well as the brain region examined. The absence of a gut microbiome can also alter hippocampal plasticity. However, the possible interplay between synaptic plasticity, acute stress, and the gut microbiota remains unknown. Here, we examine this interaction and determine whether the gut microbiota impacts stress-induced alterations in hippocampal plasticity. Further, we explored whether exposure to the microbial metabolite butyrate is sufficient to counteract stress-induced alterations in synaptic plasticity. We used electrophysiological and molecular experiments in adult male C57/BL6 antibiotic-treated and acutely stressed mice.
In electrophysiological experiments we treated hippocampal slices with 3 μM sodium butyrate to explore the effect of this microbial metabolite. We found the presence of the microbiota essential for the enhancement of both short- and long-term potentiation induced by 15 min of acute restraint stress. Furthermore, butyrate exposure effectively restored the stress-induced enhancement of potentiation in slices from microbiome-depleted animals while also enhancing long-term potentiation independent of stress. In addition, alterations of hippocampal synaptic plasticity markers were noted.
Our findings highlight a critical new temporal role for gut-derived metabolites in defining the impact of acute stress on synaptic plasticity.

Abstract Image

急性应激通过微生物依赖机制增强雄性小鼠突触可塑性。
急性应激可增强或损害突触可塑性,这取决于应激暴露的性质、持续时间和类型以及所检查的大脑区域。肠道微生物群的缺失也会改变海马的可塑性。然而,突触可塑性、急性应激和肠道微生物群之间可能的相互作用仍然未知。在这里,我们研究了这种相互作用,并确定肠道微生物群是否影响应激诱导的海马可塑性改变。此外,我们探讨了暴露于微生物代谢物丁酸盐是否足以抵消应力诱导的突触可塑性改变。我们对C57/BL6抗生素治疗的成年雄性小鼠和急性应激小鼠进行了电生理和分子实验。在电生理实验中,我们用3 μM丁酸钠处理海马切片,探讨该微生物代谢物的作用。我们发现微生物群的存在对15分钟急性抑制应激引起的短期和长期增强都是必不可少的。此外,丁酸盐暴露有效地恢复了微生物组枯竭动物切片中应激诱导的增强,同时也增强了独立于应激的长期增强。此外,还观察到海马突触可塑性标志物的改变。我们的研究结果强调了肠源代谢物在确定急性应激对突触可塑性的影响方面的关键新时间作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropharmacology
Neuropharmacology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
288
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Neuropharmacology publishes high quality, original research and review articles within the discipline of neuroscience, especially articles with a neuropharmacological component. However, papers within any area of neuroscience will be considered. The journal does not usually accept clinical research, although preclinical neuropharmacological studies in humans may be considered. The journal only considers submissions in which the chemical structures and compositions of experimental agents are readily available in the literature or disclosed by the authors in the submitted manuscript. Only in exceptional circumstances will natural products be considered, and then only if the preparation is well defined by scientific means. Neuropharmacology publishes articles of any length (original research and reviews).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信