The impact of COVID-19 policy stringency on patient satisfaction with community pharmacies in China: A cross-sectional standardized patient study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ruijian Huang, Dong Roman Xu, Jay Pan, Xiaohui Wang, Yingsong Chen, Qingyuan Xue, Jiamei Liu, Jingyun Xu, Yue Xiao, Feng Jiang, Yanfei Chen, Siyu Ding, Di Wang, Jifang Zhou
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 policy stringency on patient satisfaction with community pharmacies in China: A cross-sectional standardized patient study.","authors":"Ruijian Huang, Dong Roman Xu, Jay Pan, Xiaohui Wang, Yingsong Chen, Qingyuan Xue, Jiamei Liu, Jingyun Xu, Yue Xiao, Feng Jiang, Yanfei Chen, Siyu Ding, Di Wang, Jifang Zhou","doi":"10.1177/13558196251330586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesCommunity pharmacies play a crucial role in China's primary health care system. This study aimed to assess the impact of stringent COVID-19 policy responses - such as lockdowns, travel restrictions and operational closures - on unannounced standardized patients' (USPs) satisfaction with community pharmacy services.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2021 to September 2022, using an USPs approach in community pharmacies across China. USPs' satisfaction was measured using validated tools, with closure policies related to COVID-19 as the primary exposure variable.ResultsThe study included 1076 eligible USP visits to community pharmacies. Results indicated that stricter closure policies had a significant negative impact on USPs' satisfaction (β = -0.18, <i>p</i> = 0.019). This negative effect may be attributed to worsened capability of pharmaceutical service providers (β = -0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and accessibility (β = -0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.019). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a negative correlation between stricter closure policies and lower satisfaction levels with regard to accessibility, capability, and communication.ConclusionsCOVID-19 closure policies in China had adverse consequences for the quality of pharmacy services. These findings highlight that governments must act with urgency when addressing abrupt infectious diseases or public health emergencies. Enhancing access to pharmacy services and capability of providers are critical strategies to ensure an effective response to sudden public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196251330586"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196251330586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesCommunity pharmacies play a crucial role in China's primary health care system. This study aimed to assess the impact of stringent COVID-19 policy responses - such as lockdowns, travel restrictions and operational closures - on unannounced standardized patients' (USPs) satisfaction with community pharmacy services.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2021 to September 2022, using an USPs approach in community pharmacies across China. USPs' satisfaction was measured using validated tools, with closure policies related to COVID-19 as the primary exposure variable.ResultsThe study included 1076 eligible USP visits to community pharmacies. Results indicated that stricter closure policies had a significant negative impact on USPs' satisfaction (β = -0.18, p = 0.019). This negative effect may be attributed to worsened capability of pharmaceutical service providers (β = -0.17, p = 0.002) and accessibility (β = -0.12, p = 0.019). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a negative correlation between stricter closure policies and lower satisfaction levels with regard to accessibility, capability, and communication.ConclusionsCOVID-19 closure policies in China had adverse consequences for the quality of pharmacy services. These findings highlight that governments must act with urgency when addressing abrupt infectious diseases or public health emergencies. Enhancing access to pharmacy services and capability of providers are critical strategies to ensure an effective response to sudden public health crises.

COVID-19政策严格程度对中国社区药房患者满意度的影响:一项横断面标准化患者研究
目的社区药房在中国初级卫生保健体系中发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在评估严格的COVID-19政策应对措施(如封锁、旅行限制和运营关闭)对未通知的标准化患者(usp)对社区药房服务的满意度的影响。方法采用USPs方法,于2021年4月至2022年9月在中国各地社区药房进行横断面研究。USPs的满意度是使用经过验证的工具来衡量的,与COVID-19相关的关闭政策是主要的暴露变量。结果本研究包括1076个符合USP标准的社区药房访问。结果表明,更严格的关闭政策对USPs的满意度有显著的负向影响(β = -0.18, p = 0.019)。这种负面影响可能是由于药品服务提供者的能力(β = -0.17, p = 0.002)和可及性(β = -0.12, p = 0.019)恶化所致。亚组分析表明,在可及性、能力和沟通方面,更严格的关闭政策与较低的满意度水平之间存在负相关。结论中国新冠肺炎疫情防控政策对药学服务质量产生不利影响。这些发现突出表明,各国政府在应对突发传染病或突发公共卫生事件时必须采取紧急行动。加强获得药房服务的机会和提供者的能力是确保有效应对突发公共卫生危机的关键战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信