{"title":"Double low protocol in pediatric abdominal CT for evaluating right lower quadrant pain.","authors":"Hyun Jeong Park, Hyewon Choi, Rae Rim Ryu","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01766-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In pediatric patients, minimizing radiation and contrast media exposure without compromising diagnostic accuracy is paramount. Double low protocol, which utilizes a low dose contrast concentration and low tube voltage, could be a safer alternative. We compare diagnostic efficacy of double low protocol (Group A, 240 mgI/ml + 80 kVp) with conventional protocol (Group B, 350 mgI/ml + 120 kVp) in pediatric patients (< 10 years) presenting with abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 121 pediatric patients who underwent enhanced abdominal CT between January 2019 and February 2023: 62 with Group A and 59 with Group B. We compared radiation dose, iodine load, and quantitative image quality parameters. Two radiologists independently assessed diagnostic image quality on a 5-point scale, visualization of the appendix, and diagnostic performance for acute appendicitis and its complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in mean age (7.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.6 ± 2.1, p = 0.956), body weight (31.4 ± 11.2 kg vs. 31.7 ± 11.4 kg, p = 0.972), and contrast media volume used (59.3 ± 21.0 ml vs. 65.0 ± 20.0 ml, p = 135) between the two groups. However, effective dose and iodine load used were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (2.7 ± 1.1 mSv vs. 4.3 ± 1.5 mSv and vs. 12.7 ± 4.6gI vs.18.6 ± 6.7gI, all p < 0.001). Although diagnostic image quality, noise and signal-to-noise ratio were significantly lower in Group A, visualization of the appendix (p = 0.853) and diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis were comparable between the two groups (98.4% vs. 94.9%, p = 0.284).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The double low protocol offers an effective alternative for evaluating pediatric patients requiring enhanced abdomen CT, achieving comparable diagnostic performance while significantly reducing radiation dose. We believe that our findings support safer CT acquisition practices for pediatric patients requiring enhanced CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1176-1185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01766-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: In pediatric patients, minimizing radiation and contrast media exposure without compromising diagnostic accuracy is paramount. Double low protocol, which utilizes a low dose contrast concentration and low tube voltage, could be a safer alternative. We compare diagnostic efficacy of double low protocol (Group A, 240 mgI/ml + 80 kVp) with conventional protocol (Group B, 350 mgI/ml + 120 kVp) in pediatric patients (< 10 years) presenting with abdominal pain and suspected acute appendicitis.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 121 pediatric patients who underwent enhanced abdominal CT between January 2019 and February 2023: 62 with Group A and 59 with Group B. We compared radiation dose, iodine load, and quantitative image quality parameters. Two radiologists independently assessed diagnostic image quality on a 5-point scale, visualization of the appendix, and diagnostic performance for acute appendicitis and its complications.
Results: There were no significant differences in mean age (7.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.6 ± 2.1, p = 0.956), body weight (31.4 ± 11.2 kg vs. 31.7 ± 11.4 kg, p = 0.972), and contrast media volume used (59.3 ± 21.0 ml vs. 65.0 ± 20.0 ml, p = 135) between the two groups. However, effective dose and iodine load used were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (2.7 ± 1.1 mSv vs. 4.3 ± 1.5 mSv and vs. 12.7 ± 4.6gI vs.18.6 ± 6.7gI, all p < 0.001). Although diagnostic image quality, noise and signal-to-noise ratio were significantly lower in Group A, visualization of the appendix (p = 0.853) and diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis were comparable between the two groups (98.4% vs. 94.9%, p = 0.284).
Discussion: The double low protocol offers an effective alternative for evaluating pediatric patients requiring enhanced abdomen CT, achieving comparable diagnostic performance while significantly reducing radiation dose. We believe that our findings support safer CT acquisition practices for pediatric patients requiring enhanced CT imaging.
目的:在儿科患者中,在不影响诊断准确性的情况下尽量减少辐射和造影剂暴露是至关重要的。双低方案,利用低剂量对比浓度和低管电压,可能是一个更安全的选择。我们比较了双低方案(A组,240 mgI/ml + 80 kVp)与常规方案(B组,350 mgI/ml + 120 kVp)在儿科患者中的诊断效果(材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括121名在2019年1月至2023年2月期间接受增强腹部CT检查的儿童患者:A组62例,B组59例。我们比较了辐射剂量、碘负荷和定量图像质量参数。两名放射科医生以5分制独立评估诊断图像质量、阑尾可视化和急性阑尾炎及其并发症的诊断表现。结果:两组患者平均年龄(7.6±2.0 vs. 7.6±2.1,p = 0.956)、体重(31.4±11.2 kg vs. 31.7±11.4 kg, p = 0.972)、造影剂用量(59.3±21.0 ml vs. 65.0±20.0 ml, p = 135)差异均无统计学意义。然而,与B组相比,A组的有效剂量和碘负荷显著降低(2.7±1.1 mSv vs. 4.3±1.5 mSv和12.7±4.6gI vs.18.6±6.7gI)。讨论:双低方案为评估需要增强腹部CT的儿科患者提供了一种有效的替代方案,在显著降低辐射剂量的同时获得了相当的诊断性能。我们相信我们的研究结果为需要增强CT成像的儿科患者提供了更安全的CT采集实践。
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.