{"title":"Association of preoperative anxiety and depression with quality of recovery after caesarean delivery: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Ayu Ishida, Mitsuru Ida, Akane Kinomoto, Yusuke Naito, Masahiko Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1186/s40981-025-00782-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the association between the presence of both anxiety and depression and the quality of recovery after caesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of a prospective observational study included 137 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent elective and urgent caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia and completed the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 scale at least once postoperatively. Before caesarean delivery, patients were screened for anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A total score of ≥ 8 in each subscale was considered positive screening. Postpartum quality of recovery was assessed using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 at three time points, with a higher score indicating better recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the eligible patients, 17.5% (24/137) screened positive for both anxiety and depression. No significant difference was found in the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 score 24 h after caesarean delivery (p = 0.13, Cohen's d = 0.33), but differences were observed on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.67) and postoperative day 5 (p = 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.58). In the multiple regression analysis, after adjusting for prominent clinical factors, the presence of both anxiety and depression was associated with the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 score on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.01) and postoperative day 5 (p = 0.01), but not 24 h after delivery (p = 0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Positive Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale screening for both anxiety and depression was associated with a poor quality of recovery, measured using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 scores on PODs 3 and 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":14635,"journal":{"name":"JA Clinical Reports","volume":"11 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JA Clinical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-025-00782-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: To investigate the association between the presence of both anxiety and depression and the quality of recovery after caesarean delivery.
Methods: This secondary analysis of a prospective observational study included 137 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent elective and urgent caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia and completed the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 scale at least once postoperatively. Before caesarean delivery, patients were screened for anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A total score of ≥ 8 in each subscale was considered positive screening. Postpartum quality of recovery was assessed using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 at three time points, with a higher score indicating better recovery.
Results: Among the eligible patients, 17.5% (24/137) screened positive for both anxiety and depression. No significant difference was found in the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 score 24 h after caesarean delivery (p = 0.13, Cohen's d = 0.33), but differences were observed on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.004, Cohen's d = 0.67) and postoperative day 5 (p = 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.58). In the multiple regression analysis, after adjusting for prominent clinical factors, the presence of both anxiety and depression was associated with the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 score on postoperative day 3 (p = 0.01) and postoperative day 5 (p = 0.01), but not 24 h after delivery (p = 0.19).
Conclusions: Positive Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale screening for both anxiety and depression was associated with a poor quality of recovery, measured using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-11 scores on PODs 3 and 5.
期刊介绍:
JA Clinical Reports is a companion journal to the Journal of Anesthesia (JA), the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). This journal is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal related to clinical anesthesia practices such as anesthesia management, pain management and intensive care. Case reports are very important articles from the viewpoint of education and the cultivation of scientific thinking in the field of anesthesia. However, submissions of anesthesia research and clinical reports from Japan are notably decreasing in major anesthesia journals. Therefore, the JSA has decided to launch a new journal, JA Clinical Reports, to encourage JSA members, particularly junior Japanese anesthesiologists, to publish papers in English language.