Lifestyle and risk factor modification in atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf075
Mark T Mills, Piotr Futyma, Peter Calvert, Diego Penela, Laurent Roten, Laura Perrotta, Federico Migliore, Gregory Y H Lip, Dhiraj Gupta, Julian K R Chun
{"title":"Lifestyle and risk factor modification in atrial fibrillation: a European Heart Rhythm Association survey.","authors":"Mark T Mills, Piotr Futyma, Peter Calvert, Diego Penela, Laurent Roten, Laura Perrotta, Federico Migliore, Gregory Y H Lip, Dhiraj Gupta, Julian K R Chun","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Lifestyle and risk factor modification (LRFM) forms a central pillar in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aims to assess current clinical practice regarding LRFM across EHRA countries.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A 31-item questionnaire was developed and distributed amongst healthcare professionals via the EHRA and social media, between 23 September and 21 October 2024. Of 258 respondents from 28 countries, 39.9% reported that their healthcare system is badly or very badly designed to deliver meaningful LRFM. Risk factors that respondents felt least confident managing included psychological distress (42.2% of respondents not confident), sleep-disordered breathing (33.8%), and obesity (22.4%). Respondents estimated that 70% of patients with AF at their institution may benefit from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation but that only 10% are referred for this. The most important barrier to cardiac rehabilitation in AF was identified as local programmes not accepting patients with AF only (42.1% of respondents). Despite 37.7% of respondents using a body mass index cut-off when deciding on catheter ablation suitability (with a mean cut-off of 36.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2), only 23.5% of patients with obesity are referred for formal dietary advice. Lack of patient motivation or engagement was identified as the most important barrier to weight loss (41.3% of respondents). Moreover, 89.6% of respondents routinely assess their patient's alcohol intake, whilst only 23.9% systemically assess for psychological distress and 16.5% for sleep-disordered breathing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivering comprehensive LRFM in AF poses significant challenges. Improvements to healthcare infrastructures are required to successfully implement meaningful LRFM.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Lifestyle and risk factor modification (LRFM) forms a central pillar in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey aims to assess current clinical practice regarding LRFM across EHRA countries.

Methods and results: A 31-item questionnaire was developed and distributed amongst healthcare professionals via the EHRA and social media, between 23 September and 21 October 2024. Of 258 respondents from 28 countries, 39.9% reported that their healthcare system is badly or very badly designed to deliver meaningful LRFM. Risk factors that respondents felt least confident managing included psychological distress (42.2% of respondents not confident), sleep-disordered breathing (33.8%), and obesity (22.4%). Respondents estimated that 70% of patients with AF at their institution may benefit from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation but that only 10% are referred for this. The most important barrier to cardiac rehabilitation in AF was identified as local programmes not accepting patients with AF only (42.1% of respondents). Despite 37.7% of respondents using a body mass index cut-off when deciding on catheter ablation suitability (with a mean cut-off of 36.7 ± 5.4 kg/m2), only 23.5% of patients with obesity are referred for formal dietary advice. Lack of patient motivation or engagement was identified as the most important barrier to weight loss (41.3% of respondents). Moreover, 89.6% of respondents routinely assess their patient's alcohol intake, whilst only 23.9% systemically assess for psychological distress and 16.5% for sleep-disordered breathing.

Conclusion: Delivering comprehensive LRFM in AF poses significant challenges. Improvements to healthcare infrastructures are required to successfully implement meaningful LRFM.

心房颤动的生活方式和危险因素的改变:一项欧洲心律协会调查。
目的:生活方式和危险因素改变(LRFM)是房颤(AF)治疗的中心支柱。这项欧洲心律协会(EHRA)调查旨在评估当前在EHRA国家关于LRFM的临床实践。方法和结果:在2024年9月23日至10月21日期间,通过EHRA和社交媒体开发了一份31项问卷,并在医疗保健专业人员中分发。在来自28个国家的258名受访者中,39.9%的人报告说,他们的医疗保健系统在提供有意义的LRFM方面设计得很差或非常差。受访者最不自信的风险因素包括心理困扰(42.2%的受访者不自信)、睡眠呼吸障碍(33.8%)和肥胖(22.4%)。受访者估计,在他们的机构中,70%的房颤患者可能受益于基于运动的心脏康复,但只有10%的患者被转诊。房颤患者心脏康复的最重要障碍被确定为地方方案不接受房颤患者(42.1%的受访者)。尽管37.7%的调查对象在决定导管消融适宜性时使用了体重指数截止值(平均截止值36.7±5.4 kg/m2),但只有23.5%的肥胖患者接受了正式的饮食建议。患者缺乏动力或参与被认为是减肥的最重要障碍(41.3%的受访者)。89.6%的受访者常规评估患者的酒精摄入量,而只有23.9%的受访者系统评估心理困扰,16.5%的受访者系统评估睡眠呼吸障碍。结论:在房颤中提供全面的LRFM是一个重大挑战。要成功实施有意义的LRFM,就需要改善医疗保健基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信