What is the optimal first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials and comparative cohort studies.

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY

BMJ Open Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001549

Dermot Gleeson, Marrissa Martyn-StJames, Ye Oo, Sarah Flatley

{"title":"What is the optimal first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised trials and comparative cohort studies.","authors":"Dermot Gleeson, Marrissa Martyn-StJames, Ye Oo, Sarah Flatley","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Uncertainty remains about many aspects of first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).Design: Systemic review with meta-analysis (MA).Data sources: Bespoke AIH Endnote Library, updated to 30 June 2024.Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies including adult patients with AIH, reporting death/transplantation, biochemical response (BR) and/or adverse effects (AEs).Data extraction and synthesis: Data pooled in MA as relative risk (RR) under random effects. Risk of bias (ROB) assessed using Cochrane ROB-2 and ROBINS-1 tools.Results: From seven RCTs (five with low and two with some ROB) and 18 cohort studies (12 moderate ROB, six high for death/transplant), we found lower death/transplantation rates in (a) patients receiving pred+/-aza (vs no pred): overall (RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.74)), in patients without symptoms (0.38 (0.19-0.75)), without cirrhosis (0.30 (0.14-0.65)), and with decompensated cirrhosis (RR 0.38 (0.23-0.61)), and (b) patients receiving pred+aza (vs pred alone) (0.38 (0.22-0.65)). Patients receiving higher (vs lower) initial pred doses had similar BR rates (RR 1.07 (0.92-1.24)) and mortality (0.71 (0.25-2.05)) but more AEs (1.73 (1.17-2.55)). Patients receiving bud (vs pred) had similar BR rates (RR 0.99 (0.71-1.39)), with fewer cosmetic AEs (0.46 (0.34-0.62)). Patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs aza) had similar BR rates (RR 1.32 (0.73-2.38)) and fewer AEs requiring drug cessation (0.20 (0.09-0.43)).Conclusions: Mortality is lower in pred-treated (vs untreated) patients, overall and in several subgroups, and in those receiving pred+aza (vs pred). Higher initial pred doses confer no clear benefit and cause more AEs. Bud (vs pred) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer cosmetic AEs. MMF (vs aza) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer serious AEs.","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956290/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Uncertainty remains about many aspects of first-line treatment of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

Design: Systemic review with meta-analysis (MA).

Data sources: Bespoke AIH Endnote Library, updated to 30 June 2024.

Eligibility criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative cohort studies including adult patients with AIH, reporting death/transplantation, biochemical response (BR) and/or adverse effects (AEs).

Data extraction and synthesis: Data pooled in MA as relative risk (RR) under random effects. Risk of bias (ROB) assessed using Cochrane ROB-2 and ROBINS-1 tools.

Results: From seven RCTs (five with low and two with some ROB) and 18 cohort studies (12 moderate ROB, six high for death/transplant), we found lower death/transplantation rates in (a) patients receiving pred+/-aza (vs no pred): overall (RR 0.38 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.74)), in patients without symptoms (0.38 (0.19-0.75)), without cirrhosis (0.30 (0.14-0.65)), and with decompensated cirrhosis (RR 0.38 (0.23-0.61)), and (b) patients receiving pred+aza (vs pred alone) (0.38 (0.22-0.65)). Patients receiving higher (vs lower) initial pred doses had similar BR rates (RR 1.07 (0.92-1.24)) and mortality (0.71 (0.25-2.05)) but more AEs (1.73 (1.17-2.55)). Patients receiving bud (vs pred) had similar BR rates (RR 0.99 (0.71-1.39)), with fewer cosmetic AEs (0.46 (0.34-0.62)). Patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (vs aza) had similar BR rates (RR 1.32 (0.73-2.38)) and fewer AEs requiring drug cessation (0.20 (0.09-0.43)).

Conclusions: Mortality is lower in pred-treated (vs untreated) patients, overall and in several subgroups, and in those receiving pred+aza (vs pred). Higher initial pred doses confer no clear benefit and cause more AEs. Bud (vs pred) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer cosmetic AEs. MMF (vs aza) achieves similar BR rates, with fewer serious AEs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

2 weeks

期刊介绍： BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.