Jue Tao Lim, Diyar Mailepessov, Chee Seng Chong, Borame Dickens, Yee Ling Lai, Youming Ng, Deng Lu, Caleb Lee, Li Yun Tan, Grace Chain, Soon Hoe Ho, Chia-Chen Chang, Pei Ma, Somya Bansal, Vernon Lee, Shuzhen Sim, Cheong Huat Tan, Lee Ching Ng
{"title":"Adjacent spillover efficacy of Wolbachia for control of dengue: emulation of a cluster randomised target trial.","authors":"Jue Tao Lim, Diyar Mailepessov, Chee Seng Chong, Borame Dickens, Yee Ling Lai, Youming Ng, Deng Lu, Caleb Lee, Li Yun Tan, Grace Chain, Soon Hoe Ho, Chia-Chen Chang, Pei Ma, Somya Bansal, Vernon Lee, Shuzhen Sim, Cheong Huat Tan, Lee Ching Ng","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03941-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Matings between male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with wAlbB strain of Wolbachia and wild-type females yield non-viable eggs, thereby suppressing Ae. aegypti abundance in the field. We evaluated the spillover efficacy of releasing wAlbB-infected Ae. aegypti male mosquitoes to suppress dengue in sites adjacent to release sites (spillover sites).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The protocol of a two-arm cluster-randomised test-negative controlled trial (cRCT) was specified and emulated using a nationally representative dengue test-negative/positive database of 454,437 individuals reporting for febrile illness to primary or secondary care in public healthcare institutions. Spillover intervention sites were defined by geolocating locations which were adjacent to, i.e. shared geographical borders with, actual Wolbachia intervention sites. We built a cohort of individuals who resided in spillover sites versus a comparator control group who resided in sites which did not receive Wolbachia interventions. We emulated a constrained randomisation protocol used in cRCTs to balance dengue risk between spillover and control arms in the pre-intervention period. We matched individuals reporting for testing in intervention and control groups by calendar time and a high-dimensional battery of sociodemographic, environmental and anthropogenic variables. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted to estimate the protective efficacy against dengue given spillover Wolbachia exposure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort consisted of 2354 matched individuals residing in Wolbachia spillover and control sites for at least 3 months in the study period. Compared to the controls, individuals residing in spillover sites for 3 or more months were associated with a 45% (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42‒0.74) reduction in risk of contracting dengue. Higher durations of spillover Wolbachia exposure also modestly increased protective efficacies. Compared to the control arm, the proportion of virologically confirmed dengue cases was lower in the spillover arm overall and across each subgroup. Protective efficacies were found across all years, age and sex subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrated the potential of Wolbachia-mediated sterility for reducing the risk of contracting dengue even in sites which were not directly treated by the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"184"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03941-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Matings between male Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with wAlbB strain of Wolbachia and wild-type females yield non-viable eggs, thereby suppressing Ae. aegypti abundance in the field. We evaluated the spillover efficacy of releasing wAlbB-infected Ae. aegypti male mosquitoes to suppress dengue in sites adjacent to release sites (spillover sites).
Methods: The protocol of a two-arm cluster-randomised test-negative controlled trial (cRCT) was specified and emulated using a nationally representative dengue test-negative/positive database of 454,437 individuals reporting for febrile illness to primary or secondary care in public healthcare institutions. Spillover intervention sites were defined by geolocating locations which were adjacent to, i.e. shared geographical borders with, actual Wolbachia intervention sites. We built a cohort of individuals who resided in spillover sites versus a comparator control group who resided in sites which did not receive Wolbachia interventions. We emulated a constrained randomisation protocol used in cRCTs to balance dengue risk between spillover and control arms in the pre-intervention period. We matched individuals reporting for testing in intervention and control groups by calendar time and a high-dimensional battery of sociodemographic, environmental and anthropogenic variables. Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted to estimate the protective efficacy against dengue given spillover Wolbachia exposure.
Results: The final cohort consisted of 2354 matched individuals residing in Wolbachia spillover and control sites for at least 3 months in the study period. Compared to the controls, individuals residing in spillover sites for 3 or more months were associated with a 45% (OR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.42‒0.74) reduction in risk of contracting dengue. Higher durations of spillover Wolbachia exposure also modestly increased protective efficacies. Compared to the control arm, the proportion of virologically confirmed dengue cases was lower in the spillover arm overall and across each subgroup. Protective efficacies were found across all years, age and sex subgroups.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrated the potential of Wolbachia-mediated sterility for reducing the risk of contracting dengue even in sites which were not directly treated by the intervention.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.