A comparative study of different parameter estimation methods for predictive models of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury following intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Huidan OuYang, Yuze Liu, Xianming He, Jianze Zhang, Lei Tao, Mengmeng Liu, Jianwu Ding, Ronghuan Hu, Jiali Hu, Zequn Huang, Su Deng, Jiayin Wu, Zhengyu Xu, Qiwei Luo, Lei Zeng
{"title":"A comparative study of different parameter estimation methods for predictive models of Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) of radiation-induced temporal lobe injury following intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.","authors":"Huidan OuYang, Yuze Liu, Xianming He, Jianze Zhang, Lei Tao, Mengmeng Liu, Jianwu Ding, Ronghuan Hu, Jiali Hu, Zequn Huang, Su Deng, Jiayin Wu, Zhengyu Xu, Qiwei Luo, Lei Zeng","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13906-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models predict temporal lobe injury risk post-intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Optimal parameter estimation methods for NTCP models need refinement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify optimal method for parameter estimation in Normal Tissue Complication Probability models for temporal lobe injury following intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, all patients underwent curative intensity-modulated radiation therapy at two research centers. Data of temporal lobes from three cohorts [Data-A, n = 278(training set); Data-B, n = 119(external validation set); Data-C, n = 215(internal validation set)]. Five NTCP models were considered, including the Serial Reconstruction Unit (SRU) model, Poisson model, Lyman model, Logit model and Logistic model. Three parameter estimation methods, namely Bayesian estimation (BE), Least Squares Estimation (LSE) and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), were applied to calibrate the five NTCP models. Area Under Curve (AUC), confusion matrices, dose-response curves were used to compare the performance of the models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred twelve patients were enrolled, with 278 in the Data-A; 119 in the Data-B; 215 in the Data-C. The Poisson-NTCP model was evaluated using AUC and R<sup>2</sup> values across three parameter estimation methods (BE, LSE, and MLE) on three datasets. The results were as follows: Data-A: BE (AUC: 0.938, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.953), LSE (0.942, 0.986), MLE (0.940, 0.843); Data-B: BE (0.744, 0.958), LSE (0.743, 0.697), MLE (0.745, 0.857); Data-C: BE (0.867, 0.915), LSE (0.862, 0.916), MLE (0.865, 0.896). Compared with the remaining models, the Poisson-NTCP model based on BE had also better performance of fitting dose-response curve and recall rate, accuracy and specificity of confusion matrix.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bayesian Estimation (BE) is the best parameter estimation method among the three parameter estimation methods. The Poisson-NTCP model based on BE exhibited the best fit to the data in predicting post-IMRT incidence of TLI in NPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"572"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13906-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) models predict temporal lobe injury risk post-intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Optimal parameter estimation methods for NTCP models need refinement.

Purpose: To identify optimal method for parameter estimation in Normal Tissue Complication Probability models for temporal lobe injury following intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Materials and methods: In this study, all patients underwent curative intensity-modulated radiation therapy at two research centers. Data of temporal lobes from three cohorts [Data-A, n = 278(training set); Data-B, n = 119(external validation set); Data-C, n = 215(internal validation set)]. Five NTCP models were considered, including the Serial Reconstruction Unit (SRU) model, Poisson model, Lyman model, Logit model and Logistic model. Three parameter estimation methods, namely Bayesian estimation (BE), Least Squares Estimation (LSE) and Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), were applied to calibrate the five NTCP models. Area Under Curve (AUC), confusion matrices, dose-response curves were used to compare the performance of the models.

Results: Six hundred twelve patients were enrolled, with 278 in the Data-A; 119 in the Data-B; 215 in the Data-C. The Poisson-NTCP model was evaluated using AUC and R2 values across three parameter estimation methods (BE, LSE, and MLE) on three datasets. The results were as follows: Data-A: BE (AUC: 0.938, R2: 0.953), LSE (0.942, 0.986), MLE (0.940, 0.843); Data-B: BE (0.744, 0.958), LSE (0.743, 0.697), MLE (0.745, 0.857); Data-C: BE (0.867, 0.915), LSE (0.862, 0.916), MLE (0.865, 0.896). Compared with the remaining models, the Poisson-NTCP model based on BE had also better performance of fitting dose-response curve and recall rate, accuracy and specificity of confusion matrix.

Conclusion: Bayesian Estimation (BE) is the best parameter estimation method among the three parameter estimation methods. The Poisson-NTCP model based on BE exhibited the best fit to the data in predicting post-IMRT incidence of TLI in NPC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信