Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy in Older Patients With Gastric Cancer.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Tomohiro Takahashi, Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Hiroaki Saito, Tomohiro Osaki, Sadamu Takahashi, Akemi Iwamoto, Kenji Fukuda, Kenjiro Taniguchi, Hirohiko Kuroda, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Kenji Sugamura, Kenichi Sumi, Kuniyuki Katano, Shota Shimizu, Yuji Shishido, Kozo Miyatani, Teruhisa Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
{"title":"Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic <i>Versus</i> Open Gastrectomy in Older Patients With Gastric Cancer.","authors":"Tomohiro Takahashi, Tomoyuki Matsunaga, Hiroaki Saito, Tomohiro Osaki, Sadamu Takahashi, Akemi Iwamoto, Kenji Fukuda, Kenjiro Taniguchi, Hirohiko Kuroda, Tsutomu Takeuchi, Kenji Sugamura, Kenichi Sumi, Kuniyuki Katano, Shota Shimizu, Yuji Shishido, Kozo Miyatani, Teruhisa Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Several studies have investigated the safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer (GC). However, many of these studies excluded older patients, and few multicenter studies have compared LG and open gastrectomy (OG) in older patients with GC. We compared the postoperative short- and long-term outcomes of LG and OG in >75 years old patients with GC in a multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included 926 patients aged >75 years who underwent gastrectomy from January 2003 to December 2017 at 12 regional hospitals. After propensity score-matching (PSM), the two surgical groups' short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. PSM was applied for variables such as sex, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, histologic type, pathological stage, gastrectomy, and lymph node dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 1:1 matching, 258 cases in each group were analyzed. The LG group showed significantly longer surgery times and reduced blood loss (<i>p</i><0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ II between the groups (23.6% <i>vs</i>. 19.4%, <i>p</i>=0.239). However, the LG group had lower and higher incidences of pneumonia (1.9% <i>vs</i>. 5.4%, <i>p</i>=0.035) and pancreatic fistula (PF; 4.7% <i>vs</i>. 0.04%, <i>p</i>=0.003), respectively. The two groups had no significant overall and disease-specific survival differences across all stages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients aged >75 years with GC, LG can be a viable approach with careful clinical management for the risk of PF, without compromising long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 4","pages":"1667-1679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Several studies have investigated the safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer (GC). However, many of these studies excluded older patients, and few multicenter studies have compared LG and open gastrectomy (OG) in older patients with GC. We compared the postoperative short- and long-term outcomes of LG and OG in >75 years old patients with GC in a multicenter study.

Patients and methods: The study included 926 patients aged >75 years who underwent gastrectomy from January 2003 to December 2017 at 12 regional hospitals. After propensity score-matching (PSM), the two surgical groups' short- and long-term outcomes were analyzed. PSM was applied for variables such as sex, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, histologic type, pathological stage, gastrectomy, and lymph node dissection.

Results: After 1:1 matching, 258 cases in each group were analyzed. The LG group showed significantly longer surgery times and reduced blood loss (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ II between the groups (23.6% vs. 19.4%, p=0.239). However, the LG group had lower and higher incidences of pneumonia (1.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.035) and pancreatic fistula (PF; 4.7% vs. 0.04%, p=0.003), respectively. The two groups had no significant overall and disease-specific survival differences across all stages.

Conclusion: In patients aged >75 years with GC, LG can be a viable approach with careful clinical management for the risk of PF, without compromising long-term survival.

老年胃癌患者腹腔镜与开腹胃切除术的术后效果比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信