HELicobacter Pylori screening to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP-MI SWEDEHEART) - Design and rationale of a cluster randomized, crossover, registry-based clinical trial
Robin Hofmann MD, PhD , Stefan James MD, PhD , Martin O. Sundqvist MD , Jonatan Wärme MD , Ole Fröbert MD, PhD , Oskar Angerås MD, PhD , Per M. Hellström MD, PhD , Kristina Hambraeus MD, PhD , Joakim Alfredsson MD, PhD , David Erlinge MD, PhD , Jörg Lauermann MD, PhD , Lars Lindhagen PhD , Ollie Östlund PhD , Tomas Jernberg MD, PhD , Magnus Bäck MD, PhD
{"title":"HELicobacter Pylori screening to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute Myocardial Infarction (HELP-MI SWEDEHEART) - Design and rationale of a cluster randomized, crossover, registry-based clinical trial","authors":"Robin Hofmann MD, PhD , Stefan James MD, PhD , Martin O. Sundqvist MD , Jonatan Wärme MD , Ole Fröbert MD, PhD , Oskar Angerås MD, PhD , Per M. Hellström MD, PhD , Kristina Hambraeus MD, PhD , Joakim Alfredsson MD, PhD , David Erlinge MD, PhD , Jörg Lauermann MD, PhD , Lars Lindhagen PhD , Ollie Östlund PhD , Tomas Jernberg MD, PhD , Magnus Bäck MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The role of <em>Helicobacter pylori</em> (<em>H. pylori</em>) screening and eradication on reducing upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) complications after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is uncertain. The HELicobacter pylori screening to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute MI (HELP-MI SWEDEHEART) trial aims to determine whether systematic <em>H. pylori</em> screening compared to usual care reduces UGIB, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes after MI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cluster randomized, crossover, registry-based clinical trial using SWEDEHEART as trial platform for study population definition and source for data collection in combination with nationwide Swedish health data registries. Thirty-five Swedish hospitals, organized into 18 clusters based on percutaneous coronary intervention networks, were randomized to either routine <em>H. pylori</em> screening for adults with acute type-1 MI or usual care. After 1 year, a 2-month blanking period was followed by a crossover to the alternate allocation for 1 year. The trial enrolment was concluded after one additional year of registry-based follow-up. The primary endpoint is UGIB. Secondary endpoints include all-cause death, cardiovascular death, readmission for MI, stroke, or heart failure. Endpoints will be reported combined (Net Adverse Clinical Events; Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events) and separately. The primary analysis will include all available follow-up time corresponding to a maximum follow-up time of 3 years and 2 months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>HELP-MI SWEDEHEART aims to determine the utility of routine <em>H. pylori</em> screening to reduce UGIB and improve cardiovascular outcomes after MI. By integrating national registry follow-up data with a pragmatic trial design, it has the potential to provide evidence for the effect of the implementation of routine <em>H. pylori</em> screening as part of acute MI care.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05024864.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"286 ","pages":"Pages 66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) screening and eradication on reducing upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) complications after acute myocardial infarction (MI) is uncertain. The HELicobacter pylori screening to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute MI (HELP-MI SWEDEHEART) trial aims to determine whether systematic H. pylori screening compared to usual care reduces UGIB, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes after MI.
Methods
A cluster randomized, crossover, registry-based clinical trial using SWEDEHEART as trial platform for study population definition and source for data collection in combination with nationwide Swedish health data registries. Thirty-five Swedish hospitals, organized into 18 clusters based on percutaneous coronary intervention networks, were randomized to either routine H. pylori screening for adults with acute type-1 MI or usual care. After 1 year, a 2-month blanking period was followed by a crossover to the alternate allocation for 1 year. The trial enrolment was concluded after one additional year of registry-based follow-up. The primary endpoint is UGIB. Secondary endpoints include all-cause death, cardiovascular death, readmission for MI, stroke, or heart failure. Endpoints will be reported combined (Net Adverse Clinical Events; Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events) and separately. The primary analysis will include all available follow-up time corresponding to a maximum follow-up time of 3 years and 2 months.
Conclusion
HELP-MI SWEDEHEART aims to determine the utility of routine H. pylori screening to reduce UGIB and improve cardiovascular outcomes after MI. By integrating national registry follow-up data with a pragmatic trial design, it has the potential to provide evidence for the effect of the implementation of routine H. pylori screening as part of acute MI care.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.