Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in non-cardiac arterial procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
T A H Steunenberg, N C Bakker, A M Wiersema, E Tournoij, K K Yeung, V Jongkind
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in non-cardiac arterial procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"T A H Steunenberg, N C Bakker, A M Wiersema, E Tournoij, K K Yeung, V Jongkind","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) are associated with a high risk of bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used among surgical disciplines to reduce blood loss, however its effectiveness and safety in NCAP remain unclear. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of TXA during NCAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (October 2023 and October 2024) identified studies investigating TXA in open and endovascular NCAP. Meta-analyses were conducted using Cochrane's Review Manager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies (n=4304) were identified. One randomized controlled trial of TXA in non-cardiac surgery (n=9535), including a vascular cohort (14.8%; n=699 TXA, n=700 placebo), showed lower composite bleeding outcomes in the overall cohort receiving TXA (9.5% vs 11.7%; p<0.001), but not in the vascular cohort (HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.64-1.13). Another trial found no difference in blood loss or transfusion rates in 100 patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Both trials reported no increased cardiovascular or thrombo-embolic complications (TEC) or 30-day mortality. A prospective study showed similar thrombosis-related technical failure rates in traumatic vascular injury patients (TXA 6.3% vs 3.8%, p=0.14) and no significant differences in bleeding or hematoma (TXA 11.4% vs 4.3%, p=0.13). In 297 carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients, TXA significantly reduced postoperative hematoma (7.9% vs 1.3%; p=0.01) without increasing TEC or stroke. TXA during an intraoperative hemostasis protocol during CEA (TXA n=8) reported similar results. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in TEC (RR 1.10; 95%CI 0.71-1.70) or reoperation rates (RR 0.55; 95%CI 0.19-1.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TXA does not increase the risk of TEC in NCAP. However, there is currently insufficient evidence that TXA reduces bleeding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.03.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Non-cardiac arterial procedures (NCAP) are associated with a high risk of bleeding. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is used among surgical disciplines to reduce blood loss, however its effectiveness and safety in NCAP remain unclear. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of TXA during NCAP.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (October 2023 and October 2024) identified studies investigating TXA in open and endovascular NCAP. Meta-analyses were conducted using Cochrane's Review Manager.

Results: Five studies (n=4304) were identified. One randomized controlled trial of TXA in non-cardiac surgery (n=9535), including a vascular cohort (14.8%; n=699 TXA, n=700 placebo), showed lower composite bleeding outcomes in the overall cohort receiving TXA (9.5% vs 11.7%; p<0.001), but not in the vascular cohort (HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.64-1.13). Another trial found no difference in blood loss or transfusion rates in 100 patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Both trials reported no increased cardiovascular or thrombo-embolic complications (TEC) or 30-day mortality. A prospective study showed similar thrombosis-related technical failure rates in traumatic vascular injury patients (TXA 6.3% vs 3.8%, p=0.14) and no significant differences in bleeding or hematoma (TXA 11.4% vs 4.3%, p=0.13). In 297 carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients, TXA significantly reduced postoperative hematoma (7.9% vs 1.3%; p=0.01) without increasing TEC or stroke. TXA during an intraoperative hemostasis protocol during CEA (TXA n=8) reported similar results. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in TEC (RR 1.10; 95%CI 0.71-1.70) or reoperation rates (RR 0.55; 95%CI 0.19-1.63).

Conclusion: TXA does not increase the risk of TEC in NCAP. However, there is currently insufficient evidence that TXA reduces bleeding complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信