Early Effective Antibiotic Therapy and Meningitis Following a Bloodstream Infection in Hospitalized Infants: A Cohort Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jessica E Ericson, Rachel Greenberg, P Brian Smith, Reese Clark, Daniel K Benjamin, Ryan Kilpatrick
{"title":"Early Effective Antibiotic Therapy and Meningitis Following a Bloodstream Infection in Hospitalized Infants: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Jessica E Ericson, Rachel Greenberg, P Brian Smith, Reese Clark, Daniel K Benjamin, Ryan Kilpatrick","doi":"10.1055/a-2568-7085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the role of early effective antibiotic therapy in preventing secondary meningitis as a sequelae of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this multicenter cohort study, we identified blood cultures that were positive for Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and other non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria that had a corresponding cerebrospinal fluid sample collected ≤7 days after the positive blood culture among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group 2002 - 2020. The odds of secondary meningitis for early effective antibiotic therapy vs delayed antibiotic therapy were compared using an adjusted logistic regression model. The odds of secondary meningitis following GBS BSI were compared for infections treated with empirical vancomycin vs beta-lactam antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Secondary meningitis was identified in 11% of 5967 BSI. Early effective antibiotic therapy was not associated with a reduced odds of secondary meningitis for GBS (aOR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82-1.66) or E. coli (aOR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38); however, was associated with decreased odds for non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria (aOR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98) and S. aureus (aOR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.74). GBS BSI were more often complicated by meningitis when vancomycin was used empirically compared to beta-lactam antibiotic (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28- 3.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early effective antibiotic therapy for BSI in infants did not reduce the odds of secondary meningitis caused by GBS or E. coli; however, early effective antibiotic therapy did reduce episodes due to non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria and S. aureus.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2568-7085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of early effective antibiotic therapy in preventing secondary meningitis as a sequelae of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI).

Study design: In this multicenter cohort study, we identified blood cultures that were positive for Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and other non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria that had a corresponding cerebrospinal fluid sample collected ≤7 days after the positive blood culture among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group 2002 - 2020. The odds of secondary meningitis for early effective antibiotic therapy vs delayed antibiotic therapy were compared using an adjusted logistic regression model. The odds of secondary meningitis following GBS BSI were compared for infections treated with empirical vancomycin vs beta-lactam antibiotic.

Results: Secondary meningitis was identified in 11% of 5967 BSI. Early effective antibiotic therapy was not associated with a reduced odds of secondary meningitis for GBS (aOR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82-1.66) or E. coli (aOR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38); however, was associated with decreased odds for non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria (aOR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98) and S. aureus (aOR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.74). GBS BSI were more often complicated by meningitis when vancomycin was used empirically compared to beta-lactam antibiotic (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28- 3.14).

Conclusion: Early effective antibiotic therapy for BSI in infants did not reduce the odds of secondary meningitis caused by GBS or E. coli; however, early effective antibiotic therapy did reduce episodes due to non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria and S. aureus.

住院婴儿血液感染后早期有效抗生素治疗和脑膜炎:一项队列研究。
目的:评价早期有效抗生素治疗在预防细菌性血流感染(BSI)继发性脑膜炎中的作用。研究设计:在这项多中心队列研究中,我们确定了B族链球菌(GBS)、金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和其他非e。在2002 - 2020年儿科医疗集团管理的新生儿重症监护病房出院的婴儿中,在血培养阳性≤7天后采集相应脑脊液样本的革兰氏阴性大肠杆菌。使用调整后的logistic回归模型比较早期有效抗生素治疗与延迟抗生素治疗继发脑膜炎的几率。比较了万古霉素与β -内酰胺抗生素治疗GBS - BSI后继发脑膜炎的几率。结果:在5967名BSI患者中,11%的人发现继发性脑膜炎。早期有效抗生素治疗与GBS继发性脑膜炎的发生率降低无关(aOR 1.17;95% CI, 0.82-1.66)或大肠杆菌(aOR 1.06;95% ci, 0.82-1.38);然而,与非e。大肠杆菌革兰氏阴性菌(aOR 0.69;95% CI, 0.49-0.98)和金黄色葡萄球菌(aOR 0.51;95% ci, 0.34-0.74)。经验用药万古霉素比β -内酰胺类抗生素更容易导致GBS - BSI并发脑膜炎(aOR 2.01;95% ci, 1.28- 3.14)。结论:早期有效抗生素治疗婴儿BSI并不能降低GBS或大肠杆菌引起的继发性脑膜炎的发生率;然而,早期有效的抗生素治疗确实减少了非e。大肠杆菌革兰氏阴性菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信