Early Effective Antibiotic Therapy and Meningitis Following a Bloodstream Infection in Hospitalized Infants: A Cohort Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jessica E Ericson, Rachel Greenberg, P Brian Smith, Reese Clark, Daniel K Benjamin, Ryan Kilpatrick
{"title":"Early Effective Antibiotic Therapy and Meningitis Following a Bloodstream Infection in Hospitalized Infants: A Cohort Study.","authors":"Jessica E Ericson, Rachel Greenberg, P Brian Smith, Reese Clark, Daniel K Benjamin, Ryan Kilpatrick","doi":"10.1055/a-2568-7085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the role of early effective antibiotic therapy in preventing secondary meningitis as a sequelae of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this multicenter cohort study, we identified blood cultures that were positive for Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and other non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria that had a corresponding cerebrospinal fluid sample collected ≤7 days after the positive blood culture among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group 2002 - 2020. The odds of secondary meningitis for early effective antibiotic therapy vs delayed antibiotic therapy were compared using an adjusted logistic regression model. The odds of secondary meningitis following GBS BSI were compared for infections treated with empirical vancomycin vs beta-lactam antibiotic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Secondary meningitis was identified in 11% of 5967 BSI. Early effective antibiotic therapy was not associated with a reduced odds of secondary meningitis for GBS (aOR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82-1.66) or E. coli (aOR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38); however, was associated with decreased odds for non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria (aOR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98) and S. aureus (aOR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.74). GBS BSI were more often complicated by meningitis when vancomycin was used empirically compared to beta-lactam antibiotic (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28- 3.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early effective antibiotic therapy for BSI in infants did not reduce the odds of secondary meningitis caused by GBS or E. coli; however, early effective antibiotic therapy did reduce episodes due to non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria and S. aureus.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2568-7085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the role of early effective antibiotic therapy in preventing secondary meningitis as a sequelae of bacterial bloodstream infections (BSI).

Study design: In this multicenter cohort study, we identified blood cultures that were positive for Group B Streptococcus (GBS), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and other non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria that had a corresponding cerebrospinal fluid sample collected ≤7 days after the positive blood culture among infants discharged from a neonatal intensive care unit managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group 2002 - 2020. The odds of secondary meningitis for early effective antibiotic therapy vs delayed antibiotic therapy were compared using an adjusted logistic regression model. The odds of secondary meningitis following GBS BSI were compared for infections treated with empirical vancomycin vs beta-lactam antibiotic.

Results: Secondary meningitis was identified in 11% of 5967 BSI. Early effective antibiotic therapy was not associated with a reduced odds of secondary meningitis for GBS (aOR 1.17; 95% CI, 0.82-1.66) or E. coli (aOR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.82-1.38); however, was associated with decreased odds for non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria (aOR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.98) and S. aureus (aOR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34-0.74). GBS BSI were more often complicated by meningitis when vancomycin was used empirically compared to beta-lactam antibiotic (aOR 2.01; 95% CI, 1.28- 3.14).

Conclusion: Early effective antibiotic therapy for BSI in infants did not reduce the odds of secondary meningitis caused by GBS or E. coli; however, early effective antibiotic therapy did reduce episodes due to non-E. coli gram-negative bacteria and S. aureus.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信