Perspectives of medication-related experiences in Black persons with kidney diseases: The patient voice.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lisa A Hillman, Curtis Warfield, Wendy L St Peter
{"title":"Perspectives of medication-related experiences in Black persons with kidney diseases: The patient voice.","authors":"Lisa A Hillman, Curtis Warfield, Wendy L St Peter","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Black persons comprise 13.4% of the US population but represent 36% of those with kidney failure. Medication-related disparities likely contribute to these outcomes. Patient perspective provides valuable insight into what they need and want from their medications and their care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted five 1.25-hour online focus group sessions via a videoconferencing app between March 30 and June 27, 2022. Our nationally recruited sample consisted of 19 adults 37 to 72 years of age who represented a broad range of educational backgrounds, all with CKD (non-dialysis-dependent, dialysis-dependent, or post kidney transplant). Semistructured guides were constructed by our team and used by moderators. Inductive thematic analysis procedures were followed. Patients representative of our study population were integral members of our research team.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis includes 3 major themes and associated subthemes: (1) meet patients where they are (subthemes: patient autonomy and empowerment, experience with illness, home and community support, barriers to understanding, and barriers to access; (2) the patient journey with medications (subthemes: fears with medications, frustrations and burdens with medication use, adjusting to medications, desire for awareness and explanation, preferences with medications, and helpful tools and supports; and (3) significant interactions with healthcare professionals (subthemes: barriers to building trust, type of care and interactions desired, and care team communication).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recognizing the patient as an individual, addressing their frustrations and needs with medications, and attending to implicit biases and strategies to overcome barriers and empower Black persons with CKD are anticipated to reduce medication- related disparities and improve health outcomes experienced by this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Black persons comprise 13.4% of the US population but represent 36% of those with kidney failure. Medication-related disparities likely contribute to these outcomes. Patient perspective provides valuable insight into what they need and want from their medications and their care.

Methods: We conducted five 1.25-hour online focus group sessions via a videoconferencing app between March 30 and June 27, 2022. Our nationally recruited sample consisted of 19 adults 37 to 72 years of age who represented a broad range of educational backgrounds, all with CKD (non-dialysis-dependent, dialysis-dependent, or post kidney transplant). Semistructured guides were constructed by our team and used by moderators. Inductive thematic analysis procedures were followed. Patients representative of our study population were integral members of our research team.

Results: Our analysis includes 3 major themes and associated subthemes: (1) meet patients where they are (subthemes: patient autonomy and empowerment, experience with illness, home and community support, barriers to understanding, and barriers to access; (2) the patient journey with medications (subthemes: fears with medications, frustrations and burdens with medication use, adjusting to medications, desire for awareness and explanation, preferences with medications, and helpful tools and supports; and (3) significant interactions with healthcare professionals (subthemes: barriers to building trust, type of care and interactions desired, and care team communication).

Conclusion: Recognizing the patient as an individual, addressing their frustrations and needs with medications, and attending to implicit biases and strategies to overcome barriers and empower Black persons with CKD are anticipated to reduce medication- related disparities and improve health outcomes experienced by this population.

黑人肾病患者用药相关经历的视角:患者的声音。
目的:黑人占美国人口的13.4%,但占肾衰竭患者的36%。与药物相关的差异可能会导致这些结果。患者的观点提供了宝贵的见解,了解他们需要什么,想要从他们的药物和护理。方法:在2022年3月30日至6月27日期间,我们通过视频会议应用程序进行了5次1.25小时的在线焦点小组会议。我们在全国范围内招募的样本包括19名年龄在37至72岁之间的成年人,他们代表了广泛的教育背景,都患有CKD(非透析依赖、透析依赖或肾移植后)。半结构化指南由我们的团队构建,供版主使用。遵循归纳主题分析程序。代表我们研究人群的患者是我们研究团队不可或缺的成员。结果:我们的分析包括3个主要主题和相关的次主题:(1)满足患者的需求(次主题:患者的自主权和赋权,疾病经历,家庭和社区支持,理解障碍和获取障碍;(2)患者用药过程(子主题:用药的恐惧、用药的挫折和负担、对药物的适应、对认知和解释的渴望、对药物的偏好、有用的工具和支持;(3)与医疗保健专业人员的显著互动(副主题:建立信任的障碍,所需的护理和互动类型,以及护理团队沟通)。结论:认识到患者作为一个个体,解决他们对药物的挫折和需求,关注隐性偏见和策略,克服障碍,赋予黑人慢性肾病患者权力,有望减少与药物相关的差异,改善该人群的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信