Tumour burden predicts outcomes after curative resection of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Jun Kawashima, Miho Akabane, Mujtaba Khalil, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Yutaka Endo, Kota Sahara, François Cauchy, Federico Aucejo, Hugo P Marques, Rita Lopes, Andreia Rodriguea, Tom Hugh, Feng Shen, Shishir K Maithel, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, Matthew J Weiss, Guillaume Martel, Carlo Pulitano, Luca Aldrighetti, George Poultsides, Andrea Ruzzenente, Todd W Bauer, Ana Gleisner, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Tumour burden predicts outcomes after curative resection of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Jun Kawashima, Miho Akabane, Mujtaba Khalil, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Yutaka Endo, Kota Sahara, François Cauchy, Federico Aucejo, Hugo P Marques, Rita Lopes, Andreia Rodriguea, Tom Hugh, Feng Shen, Shishir K Maithel, Bas Groot Koerkamp, Irinel Popescu, Minoru Kitago, Matthew J Weiss, Guillaume Martel, Carlo Pulitano, Luca Aldrighetti, George Poultsides, Andrea Ruzzenente, Todd W Bauer, Ana Gleisner, Itaru Endo, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver resection for multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial due to a poor prognosis, driven by aggressive tumour biology. The aim of this study was to stratify multifocal ICC patients to identify those who are likely to benefit from resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent hepatectomy for ICC were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Among patients with multifocal tumours, overall survival (OS) was analysed using multivariable Cox regression to identify prognostic factors. Tumour burden score (TBS) was used for stratification of multifocal ICC, with the optimal cut-off determined via restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1502 patients, 208 (13.8%) had multifocal ICC. Among them, independent predictors of prognosis included TBS (HR 1.09), ASA grade >II (HR 1.48), cirrhosis (HR 2.05), periductal infiltrating/mass forming plus periductal infiltrating morphological subtype (HR 1.58), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.59). RCS analysis identified a TBS of 7.0 as the optimal cut-off. Notably, multifocal ICC patients with a low TBS (<7.0) demonstrated comparable 3-year OS to solitary ICC patients with AJCC stage II/III. In contrast, patients with a high TBS (≥7.0) and multifocal ICC exhibited the worst prognosis (3-year OS: stage I and solitary 67.1%, stage II/III and solitary 43.2%, low TBS and multifocal 43.4%, and high TBS and multifocal 17.8% (P < 0.001)).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whereas patients with high-TBS multifocal ICC had a poor prognosis, individuals with low-TBS multifocal ICC demonstrated survival outcomes comparable to solitary ICC patients. These findings emphasize the importance of stratifying patients by tumour burden to guide surgical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for multifocal ICC.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf050","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver resection for multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains controversial due to a poor prognosis, driven by aggressive tumour biology. The aim of this study was to stratify multifocal ICC patients to identify those who are likely to benefit from resection.

Methods: Patients who underwent upfront curative-intent hepatectomy for ICC were identified from an international multi-institutional database. Among patients with multifocal tumours, overall survival (OS) was analysed using multivariable Cox regression to identify prognostic factors. Tumour burden score (TBS) was used for stratification of multifocal ICC, with the optimal cut-off determined via restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.

Results: Of 1502 patients, 208 (13.8%) had multifocal ICC. Among them, independent predictors of prognosis included TBS (HR 1.09), ASA grade >II (HR 1.48), cirrhosis (HR 2.05), periductal infiltrating/mass forming plus periductal infiltrating morphological subtype (HR 1.58), and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.59). RCS analysis identified a TBS of 7.0 as the optimal cut-off. Notably, multifocal ICC patients with a low TBS (<7.0) demonstrated comparable 3-year OS to solitary ICC patients with AJCC stage II/III. In contrast, patients with a high TBS (≥7.0) and multifocal ICC exhibited the worst prognosis (3-year OS: stage I and solitary 67.1%, stage II/III and solitary 43.2%, low TBS and multifocal 43.4%, and high TBS and multifocal 17.8% (P < 0.001)).

Conclusion: Whereas patients with high-TBS multifocal ICC had a poor prognosis, individuals with low-TBS multifocal ICC demonstrated survival outcomes comparable to solitary ICC patients. These findings emphasize the importance of stratifying patients by tumour burden to guide surgical decision-making and optimize treatment strategies for multifocal ICC.

肿瘤负荷预测多灶性肝内胆管癌根治性切除后的预后。
背景:多灶性肝内胆管癌(ICC)的肝切除治疗由于肿瘤生物学的侵袭性导致预后不良,目前仍存在争议。本研究的目的是对多灶性ICC患者进行分层,以确定那些可能从切除术中获益的患者。方法:从一个国际多机构数据库中确定了因ICC接受前期治疗目的肝切除术的患者。在多灶性肿瘤患者中,使用多变量Cox回归分析总生存期(OS)以确定预后因素。肿瘤负荷评分(TBS)用于多灶ICC分层,并通过限制性三次样条(RCS)分析确定最佳截止点。结果:1502例患者中,208例(13.8%)为多灶性ICC。其中,独立预测预后的因素包括TBS (HR 1.09)、ASA分级>II (HR 1.48)、肝硬化(HR 2.05)、管周浸润/包块形成+管周浸润形态亚型(HR 1.58)、接受辅助化疗(HR 0.59)。RCS分析确定TBS为7.0为最佳截止值。结论:尽管高TBS多灶ICC患者预后较差,但低TBS多灶ICC患者的生存结果与单独ICC患者相当。这些发现强调了根据肿瘤负担对患者进行分层的重要性,以指导多灶性ICC的手术决策和优化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信