European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Hematological malignancies

IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
HemaSphere Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1002/hem3.70108
John G. Gribben, Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez, Simon Crompton, Jann Arends, Christophe Bardin, Heiko Becker, Frederic Castinetti, Dégi L. Csaba, Melvin D'Anastasi, Thomas Frese, Jan Geissler, Reda Matuzeviciene, Marius E. Mayerhoefer, Rui Medeiros, Kate Morgan, Šarūnas Narbutas, Samantha Nier, Umberto Ricardi, Eugenia Trigoso Arjona, Mehmet Ungan, Lorna Warwick, Emanuele Zucca
{"title":"European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Hematological malignancies","authors":"John G. Gribben,&nbsp;Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez,&nbsp;Simon Crompton,&nbsp;Jann Arends,&nbsp;Christophe Bardin,&nbsp;Heiko Becker,&nbsp;Frederic Castinetti,&nbsp;Dégi L. Csaba,&nbsp;Melvin D'Anastasi,&nbsp;Thomas Frese,&nbsp;Jan Geissler,&nbsp;Reda Matuzeviciene,&nbsp;Marius E. Mayerhoefer,&nbsp;Rui Medeiros,&nbsp;Kate Morgan,&nbsp;Šarūnas Narbutas,&nbsp;Samantha Nier,&nbsp;Umberto Ricardi,&nbsp;Eugenia Trigoso Arjona,&nbsp;Mehmet Ungan,&nbsp;Lorna Warwick,&nbsp;Emanuele Zucca","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCCs) are primarily organizational recommendations, giving politicians, managers, oncology teams, patients, and patient advocacy groups a non-technical overview of the elements needed to provide high-quality care throughout the patient journey. They are not clinical guidelines, but define the actions necessary to deliver high-quality care to patients with specific cancer types, here applied to hematological malignancies in Europe.</p><p>The recommendations set out an aspirational but realistic standard that should be within reach for most countries, given adequate resourcing. They include the need for (1) fast and easy access to accurate diagnostic tests; (2) clearly established pathways for referral to specialist centers; (3) services to be centralized; (4) continuous monitoring of patient well-being; (5) treatment strategies to be agreed by a core multidisciplinary team; and (6) patients and their families to be involved at all stages of decision-making.</p><p>The foundation of ERQCCs is quality. This has become increasingly important in all aspects of healthcare as new and complex treatments come into use and pressure grows on resources. Improving quality means delivering cancer care that is timely, safe, effective, and efficient; that puts the patient at the center; and that gives all people in Europe equal access to high-quality services.</p><p>Variations in cancer outcomes and disparities in management and funding across Europe make quality frameworks essential.<span><sup>1</sup></span> The European Guide on Quality Improvement in Comprehensive Cancer Control (2017) underscored this fact, recommending comprehensive cancer centers and integrated care networks.<span><sup>2</sup></span> However, while some progress has been made in concentrating expertise for specific tumor types such as breast and prostate cancers, dedicated multidisciplinary units are lacking for most cancers, including hematological malignancies. Recent initiatives such as Europe's Beating Cancer Plan have added a new momentum to quality initiatives, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration and timely access to quality treatment, aligning closely with ERQCC principles.</p><p>Hematological malignancies (blood cancers) are the fifth most common cancer group in economically developed regions. They include leukemias, lymphomas, and myelomas, with over 100 clinically meaningful subtypes defined by the World Health Organization's Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues and the International Consensus Classification.<span><sup>3-6</sup></span> The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Hematology Association (EHA) have issued clinical practice guidelines for many of the subtypes and these are regularly updated.</p><p>The European-Commission-funded HAEMACARE project has produced crude, age-specific, and age-standardized incidence rates for hematological malignancies in Europe, categorized according to morphological subtype.<span><sup>7</sup></span> These were derived from data on 66,371 diagnosed lymphoid malignancies and 21,796 myeloid malignancies recorded between 2000 and 2002 by 44 European cancer registries.</p><p>The age-standardized incidence rates were 24.5 (per 100,000) for lymphoid malignancies and 7.55 for myeloid malignancies. Among lymphoid malignancies, the most prevalent subtypes were plasma cell neoplasms (4.62), small B-cell lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphatic leukemia (3.79), diffuse B-cell lymphoma (3.13), and Hodgkin lymphoma (2.41). Meanwhile, the most common myeloid malignancies included acute myeloid leukemia (2.96), other myeloproliferative neoplasms (1.76), and myelodysplastic syndromes (1.24). Lymphoid malignancies with unknown morphology were most prevalent in Northern Europe (7.53), whereas unknown morphology myeloid malignancies were the most common in Southern Europe (0.73).</p><p>Overall, the incidence of hematological malignancies was the lowest in Eastern Europe, with lower rates observed in women. Southern Europe showed the highest incidence for most lymphoid malignancies, while the United Kingdom and Ireland showed the highest incidence for myeloid malignancies. Variations in diagnostic and registration criteria significantly contribute to disparities in incidence, alongside differences in the distribution of hematological malignancy risk factors.</p><p>Essential requirements for the organization of quality care for people with hematological malignancies are summarized in Table 1.</p><p>The core multidisciplinary team should include representation from the following areas.</p><p>The information presented in this paper provides a comprehensive description of the essential requirements for establishing a high-quality service for hematological cancers. The ERQCC expert group is aware that it is not possible to propose a “one size fits all” system for all countries, but its recommendations aim to set out a realistic standard of quality that is within reach.</p><p>All authors were part of a working group planning content of the paper, and then submitting individual contributions based on their own interests and speciality. In addition, John G. Gribben and Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez co-chaired the group and supervised the writing of the paper, which was completed by medical writer Simon Crompton. All authors assessed and commented on successive drafts of the paper.</p><p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p>The administration and writing of this paper were supported and paid for by the European Cancer Organisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCCs) are primarily organizational recommendations, giving politicians, managers, oncology teams, patients, and patient advocacy groups a non-technical overview of the elements needed to provide high-quality care throughout the patient journey. They are not clinical guidelines, but define the actions necessary to deliver high-quality care to patients with specific cancer types, here applied to hematological malignancies in Europe.

The recommendations set out an aspirational but realistic standard that should be within reach for most countries, given adequate resourcing. They include the need for (1) fast and easy access to accurate diagnostic tests; (2) clearly established pathways for referral to specialist centers; (3) services to be centralized; (4) continuous monitoring of patient well-being; (5) treatment strategies to be agreed by a core multidisciplinary team; and (6) patients and their families to be involved at all stages of decision-making.

The foundation of ERQCCs is quality. This has become increasingly important in all aspects of healthcare as new and complex treatments come into use and pressure grows on resources. Improving quality means delivering cancer care that is timely, safe, effective, and efficient; that puts the patient at the center; and that gives all people in Europe equal access to high-quality services.

Variations in cancer outcomes and disparities in management and funding across Europe make quality frameworks essential.1 The European Guide on Quality Improvement in Comprehensive Cancer Control (2017) underscored this fact, recommending comprehensive cancer centers and integrated care networks.2 However, while some progress has been made in concentrating expertise for specific tumor types such as breast and prostate cancers, dedicated multidisciplinary units are lacking for most cancers, including hematological malignancies. Recent initiatives such as Europe's Beating Cancer Plan have added a new momentum to quality initiatives, emphasizing multidisciplinary collaboration and timely access to quality treatment, aligning closely with ERQCC principles.

Hematological malignancies (blood cancers) are the fifth most common cancer group in economically developed regions. They include leukemias, lymphomas, and myelomas, with over 100 clinically meaningful subtypes defined by the World Health Organization's Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues and the International Consensus Classification.3-6 The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European Hematology Association (EHA) have issued clinical practice guidelines for many of the subtypes and these are regularly updated.

The European-Commission-funded HAEMACARE project has produced crude, age-specific, and age-standardized incidence rates for hematological malignancies in Europe, categorized according to morphological subtype.7 These were derived from data on 66,371 diagnosed lymphoid malignancies and 21,796 myeloid malignancies recorded between 2000 and 2002 by 44 European cancer registries.

The age-standardized incidence rates were 24.5 (per 100,000) for lymphoid malignancies and 7.55 for myeloid malignancies. Among lymphoid malignancies, the most prevalent subtypes were plasma cell neoplasms (4.62), small B-cell lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphatic leukemia (3.79), diffuse B-cell lymphoma (3.13), and Hodgkin lymphoma (2.41). Meanwhile, the most common myeloid malignancies included acute myeloid leukemia (2.96), other myeloproliferative neoplasms (1.76), and myelodysplastic syndromes (1.24). Lymphoid malignancies with unknown morphology were most prevalent in Northern Europe (7.53), whereas unknown morphology myeloid malignancies were the most common in Southern Europe (0.73).

Overall, the incidence of hematological malignancies was the lowest in Eastern Europe, with lower rates observed in women. Southern Europe showed the highest incidence for most lymphoid malignancies, while the United Kingdom and Ireland showed the highest incidence for myeloid malignancies. Variations in diagnostic and registration criteria significantly contribute to disparities in incidence, alongside differences in the distribution of hematological malignancy risk factors.

Essential requirements for the organization of quality care for people with hematological malignancies are summarized in Table 1.

The core multidisciplinary team should include representation from the following areas.

The information presented in this paper provides a comprehensive description of the essential requirements for establishing a high-quality service for hematological cancers. The ERQCC expert group is aware that it is not possible to propose a “one size fits all” system for all countries, but its recommendations aim to set out a realistic standard of quality that is within reach.

All authors were part of a working group planning content of the paper, and then submitting individual contributions based on their own interests and speciality. In addition, John G. Gribben and Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez co-chaired the group and supervised the writing of the paper, which was completed by medical writer Simon Crompton. All authors assessed and commented on successive drafts of the paper.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The administration and writing of this paper were supported and paid for by the European Cancer Organisation.

欧洲癌症组织质量癌症护理的基本要求:血液恶性肿瘤
欧洲癌症组织质量癌症护理基本要求(ERQCCs)主要是组织建议,为政治家、管理者、肿瘤团队、患者和患者倡导团体提供了在整个患者旅程中提供高质量护理所需元素的非技术概述。它们不是临床指南,但定义了为特定癌症类型的患者提供高质量护理所需的行动,这里适用于欧洲的血液恶性肿瘤。这些建议提出了一个理想但现实的标准,只要有足够的资源,大多数国家都应该能够达到这个标准。它们包括需要(1)快速方便地获得准确的诊断测试;(2)明确的转诊途径;(三)集中服务;(4)持续监测患者健康状况;(5)由核心多学科团队商定的治疗策略;(6)患者及其家属应参与决策的各个阶段。erqcc的基础是质量。随着新的和复杂的治疗方法的使用和资源压力的增加,这在医疗保健的各个方面变得越来越重要。提高质量意味着提供及时、安全、有效和高效的癌症治疗;把病人放在中心;这让所有欧洲人都能平等地获得高质量的服务。欧洲各地癌症结果的差异以及管理和资金的差异使得质量框架至关重要《欧洲癌症综合控制质量改进指南》(2017年)强调了这一事实,建议建立综合癌症中心和综合护理网络然而,尽管在集中针对特定肿瘤类型(如乳腺癌和前列腺癌)的专业知识方面取得了一些进展,但大多数癌症(包括血液系统恶性肿瘤)缺乏专门的多学科单位。最近的倡议,如欧洲战胜癌症计划,为质量倡议增添了新的动力,强调多学科合作和及时获得高质量治疗,与ERQCC原则密切一致。血液恶性肿瘤(血癌)是经济发达地区第五大最常见的癌症群体。它们包括白血病、淋巴瘤和骨髓瘤,世界卫生组织的《造血和淋巴组织肿瘤分类》和国际共识分类定义了100多种具有临床意义的亚型。3-6欧洲肿瘤医学学会(ESMO)和欧洲血液学协会(EHA)已经发布了许多亚型的临床实践指南,并定期更新。欧洲委员会资助的HAEMACARE项目已经产生了欧洲血液系统恶性肿瘤的粗略、年龄特异性和年龄标准化发病率,并根据形态学亚型进行了分类这些数据来源于2000年至2002年间44个欧洲癌症登记处记录的66371例确诊的淋巴恶性肿瘤和21796例髓系恶性肿瘤的数据。淋巴恶性肿瘤的年龄标准化发病率为24.5(每10万人),髓系恶性肿瘤为7.55。在淋巴细胞恶性肿瘤中,最常见的亚型是浆细胞肿瘤(4.62)、小b细胞淋巴细胞淋巴瘤/慢性淋巴白血病(3.79)、弥漫性b细胞淋巴瘤(3.13)和霍奇金淋巴瘤(2.41)。同时,最常见的髓系恶性肿瘤包括急性髓系白血病(2.96)、其他骨髓增生性肿瘤(1.76)和骨髓增生异常综合征(1.24)。形态学未知的淋巴细胞恶性肿瘤在北欧最为常见(7.53),而形态学未知的髓系恶性肿瘤在南欧最为常见(0.73)。总体而言,东欧的恶性血液病发病率最低,女性发病率更低。南欧的淋巴系统恶性肿瘤发病率最高,而英国和爱尔兰的髓系恶性肿瘤发病率最高。诊断和登记标准的差异显著地导致了发病率的差异,以及血液恶性肿瘤危险因素分布的差异。表1总结了组织恶性血液病患者高质量护理的基本要求。核心多学科团队应包括以下领域的代表。本文提供的信息全面描述了建立高质量血液学癌症服务的基本要求。ERQCC专家组意识到,不可能为所有国家提出一个“一刀切”的体系,但其建议旨在制定一个现实的、可实现的质量标准。 所有作者都是工作小组的一部分,计划论文的内容,然后根据自己的兴趣和专业提交个人贡献。此外,John G. Gribben和Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez共同担任小组主席,并监督论文的撰写,该论文由医学作家Simon Crompton完成。所有作者都对论文的连续草稿进行了评估和评论。作者声明无利益冲突。这篇论文的管理和写作由欧洲癌症组织支持和支付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HemaSphere
HemaSphere Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
2776
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology. In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care. Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信