Students' Test Anxiety and Performance in Introductory Programming: Do Exam and Assessment Modalities Play a Role?

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Bojan Tomić, Tatjana Stojanović, Ilija Antović, Miloš Milić
{"title":"Students' Test Anxiety and Performance in Introductory Programming: Do Exam and Assessment Modalities Play a Role?","authors":"Bojan Tomić,&nbsp;Tatjana Stojanović,&nbsp;Ilija Antović,&nbsp;Miloš Milić","doi":"10.1002/cae.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Many students encounter programming for the first time during undergraduate studies. Programming, being different from conventional elementary and middle school subjects, maybe a source of anxiety and frustration for these students. It is already known that heightened anxiety can negatively impact test performance, that females are more test anxious than males, and that many introductory computer science courses suffer from high dropout rates. This is the second part of our two-fold study, which aims to answer whether exam and assessment modalities influence students' test anxiety and the (possible) correlation between test anxiety and performance in an introductory programming course. The research questions and most important findings are as follows: (i) female versus male students' test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam (female students exhibited higher levels of test anxiety than male students), (ii) test anxiety regarding a paper-based manually assessed exam versus test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam (test anxiety during a paper-based manually assessed programming exam was lower than the latter), (iii) general test anxiety versus test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam (only female students were more test anxious on a computer-based automatically assessed exam than in general), (iv) test anxiety regarding a paper-based manually assessed exam and exam score (no correlation found), and (v) test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam and exam score (statistically significant, moderately negative correlation found only for female students). Our findings suggest that efforts should be made toward addressing female students' test anxiety in introductory programming as their well-being and exam performance are affected the most.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.70026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many students encounter programming for the first time during undergraduate studies. Programming, being different from conventional elementary and middle school subjects, maybe a source of anxiety and frustration for these students. It is already known that heightened anxiety can negatively impact test performance, that females are more test anxious than males, and that many introductory computer science courses suffer from high dropout rates. This is the second part of our two-fold study, which aims to answer whether exam and assessment modalities influence students' test anxiety and the (possible) correlation between test anxiety and performance in an introductory programming course. The research questions and most important findings are as follows: (i) female versus male students' test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam (female students exhibited higher levels of test anxiety than male students), (ii) test anxiety regarding a paper-based manually assessed exam versus test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam (test anxiety during a paper-based manually assessed programming exam was lower than the latter), (iii) general test anxiety versus test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam (only female students were more test anxious on a computer-based automatically assessed exam than in general), (iv) test anxiety regarding a paper-based manually assessed exam and exam score (no correlation found), and (v) test anxiety regarding a computer-based automatically assessed exam and exam score (statistically significant, moderately negative correlation found only for female students). Our findings suggest that efforts should be made toward addressing female students' test anxiety in introductory programming as their well-being and exam performance are affected the most.

编程入门课程中学生的考试焦虑与表现:考试和评估方式起作用吗?
许多学生在本科学习期间第一次接触编程。编程与传统的中小学课程不同,这可能是这些学生焦虑和沮丧的根源。众所周知,高度焦虑会对考试成绩产生负面影响,女性比男性更焦虑,许多计算机科学入门课程的辍学率很高。这是我们的双重研究的第二部分,旨在回答考试和评估模式是否影响学生的考试焦虑,以及考试焦虑与编程入门课程成绩之间(可能的)相关性。研究问题和最重要的发现如下:(i)女生与男生在计算机自动评估考试方面的考试焦虑(女生比男生表现出更高的考试焦虑水平),(ii)在纸质手工评估考试方面的考试焦虑与在计算机自动评估考试方面的考试焦虑(纸质手工评估编程考试期间的考试焦虑低于后者),(iii)一般考试焦虑与基于计算机的自动评估考试的考试焦虑(只有女生在基于计算机的自动评估考试中比一般考试焦虑),(iv)关于基于纸张的人工评估考试和考试成绩的考试焦虑(没有发现相关性),以及(v)关于基于计算机的自动评估考试和考试成绩的考试焦虑(统计显著,中度负相关仅在女学生中发现)。我们的研究结果表明,应该努力解决女生在入门编程中的考试焦虑,因为她们的幸福感和考试成绩受到的影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信