The political ecology of disasters: The impact of knowledge/power on the responses to urban coastal disasters in Pekalongan, Indonesia

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Erlis Saputra, Hilary Reinhart, Azis Musthofa, Abdur Rofi, Azidatul Khairatin Nu'mah, Adji Saiddinullah
{"title":"The political ecology of disasters: The impact of knowledge/power on the responses to urban coastal disasters in Pekalongan, Indonesia","authors":"Erlis Saputra,&nbsp;Hilary Reinhart,&nbsp;Azis Musthofa,&nbsp;Abdur Rofi,&nbsp;Azidatul Khairatin Nu'mah,&nbsp;Adji Saiddinullah","doi":"10.1002/geo2.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The coastal region of North Java is increasingly vulnerable to climate change, as evidenced by worsening tidal flooding driven by accelerated land subsidence and rising sea levels. Various risk management strategies have been implemented, often incorporating local community participation. Drawing on political ecology and post-politics frameworks, this study examines how expert and authoritative knowledge shape these strategies through discursive processes. Using case study methods, we analyse the role of knowledge production in disaster management. The study's findings reveal a fundamental divide in knowledge systems: while government agencies and experts emphasise rational, technical and large-scale infrastructural solutions, local communities derive their understanding from lived experiences and the direct impacts on their livelihoods. Disaster management discourse remains dominated by Western-centric, technocratic paradigms, reinforcing decisions that prioritise infrastructure development and decentralised governance. However, these top-down interventions often produce unintended consequences for vulnerable communities. The discourse surrounding climate change is couched in terms of an urgent crisis, thus further legitimising large-scale interventions while sidelining community-driven adaptation strategies. In response, local communities assert their own expertise through daily adaptation practices and traditional knowledge. This study highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to disaster governance; one that integrates diverse knowledge systems and empowers local actors. We argue that scientific and institutional frameworks should evolve to support alternative perspectives and sustainable, localised responses to climate-related disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/geo2.70006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coastal region of North Java is increasingly vulnerable to climate change, as evidenced by worsening tidal flooding driven by accelerated land subsidence and rising sea levels. Various risk management strategies have been implemented, often incorporating local community participation. Drawing on political ecology and post-politics frameworks, this study examines how expert and authoritative knowledge shape these strategies through discursive processes. Using case study methods, we analyse the role of knowledge production in disaster management. The study's findings reveal a fundamental divide in knowledge systems: while government agencies and experts emphasise rational, technical and large-scale infrastructural solutions, local communities derive their understanding from lived experiences and the direct impacts on their livelihoods. Disaster management discourse remains dominated by Western-centric, technocratic paradigms, reinforcing decisions that prioritise infrastructure development and decentralised governance. However, these top-down interventions often produce unintended consequences for vulnerable communities. The discourse surrounding climate change is couched in terms of an urgent crisis, thus further legitimising large-scale interventions while sidelining community-driven adaptation strategies. In response, local communities assert their own expertise through daily adaptation practices and traditional knowledge. This study highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to disaster governance; one that integrates diverse knowledge systems and empowers local actors. We argue that scientific and institutional frameworks should evolve to support alternative perspectives and sustainable, localised responses to climate-related disasters.

Abstract Image

灾害的政治生态:知识/权力对印尼贝加隆岸城市沿海灾害响应的影响
北爪哇沿海地区越来越容易受到气候变化的影响,地表沉降加速和海平面上升导致的潮汐洪水恶化就是证据。已经实施了各种风险管理战略,其中往往包括当地社区的参与。利用政治生态学和后政治框架,本研究考察了专家和权威知识如何通过话语过程塑造这些策略。运用案例研究的方法,我们分析了知识生产在灾害管理中的作用。该研究的发现揭示了知识体系中的一个根本分歧:政府机构和专家强调理性、技术性和大规模的基础设施解决方案,而当地社区则从生活经验和对其生计的直接影响中获得理解。灾害管理话语仍然被以西方为中心的技术官僚范式所主导,强化了优先考虑基础设施发展和分散治理的决策。然而,这些自上而下的干预措施往往会给脆弱社区带来意想不到的后果。围绕气候变化的讨论以紧急危机的形式表达,从而进一步使大规模干预措施合法化,同时使社区驱动的适应战略边缘化。作为回应,当地社区通过日常适应实践和传统知识来维护自己的专业知识。这项研究强调需要采取更具包容性的灾害治理方法;它整合了不同的知识体系,并赋予地方行动者权力。我们认为,科学和制度框架应该不断发展,以支持对气候相关灾害的替代观点和可持续的、本地化的应对措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信