Challenges in skill acquisition and memory retention in children with developmental language disorder

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Carmit Altman, Nehama Shaya, Roni Berke, Esther Adi-Japha
{"title":"Challenges in skill acquisition and memory retention in children with developmental language disorder","authors":"Carmit Altman,&nbsp;Nehama Shaya,&nbsp;Roni Berke,&nbsp;Esther Adi-Japha","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding memory retention in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) compared with their typically developing (TD) peers enhances our knowledge of memory processes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To examine long-term memory consolidation of a declarative object-location task and a procedural symbol-writing task, along with grammatical and lexical skills, in 5-year-old children with DLD and their age-matched peers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods &amp; Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 23 children with DLD and 30 TD peers participated. For procedural memory, children practiced writing a new symbol and were assessed 4 hours and 2 weeks post-practice. For declarative memory, they practiced locating cards until they achieved 75% correct responses and were assessed again 4 hours and 2 weeks post-practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results &amp; Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Children with DLD had fewer correct responses on the declarative-memory object location task with the gap widening significantly from 4 hours to 2 weeks post-training. On the procedural symbol-writing task, children with DLD showed overall lower accuracy. Furthermore, only their TD peers exhibited delayed gains 4 hours post-training in production times, while they narrowed the gap two weeks later. A speed–accuracy trade-off was observed during their symbol-writing practice. These results highlight atypical long-term declarative memory retention and procedural knowledge acquisition in DLD. Consistent with previous studies, declarative memory correlated with lexical scores in both groups, while procedural memory correlated with grammatical scores only in TD peers. Interestingly, long-term procedural learning was linked to lexical abilities in children with TD. Characterizing child performance in short and long intervals following practice may aid clinicians in supporting children with DLD beyond the clinical setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Current studies emphasize the role of long-term memory in language learning, particularly procedural memory for grammar and declarative memory for lexical knowledge but often overlook longer term performance and non-sleep memory consolidation. Additionally, most research focuses on older children, with few studies addressing younger children at critical language acquisition ages, a gap this study aims to fill.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The study shows that children with DLD exhibit atypical patterns in declarative and procedural memory post-training. It also establishes correlations between memory types and language skills, highlighting distinct memory challenges in children with DLD compared with their TD peers.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>The clinical implications of this study highlight the need for targeted interventions to address post-practice memory deficits in children with DLD. The findings indicate that children with DLD struggle with both declarative and procedural memory tasks at different post-training intervals, suggesting the necessity for early, ongoing support. Personalized educational and clinical strategies that consider each child's unique memory profile can enhance language acquisition and overall learning outcomes, making tailored interventions crucial.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding memory retention in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) compared with their typically developing (TD) peers enhances our knowledge of memory processes.

Aims

To examine long-term memory consolidation of a declarative object-location task and a procedural symbol-writing task, along with grammatical and lexical skills, in 5-year-old children with DLD and their age-matched peers.

Methods & Procedures

A total of 23 children with DLD and 30 TD peers participated. For procedural memory, children practiced writing a new symbol and were assessed 4 hours and 2 weeks post-practice. For declarative memory, they practiced locating cards until they achieved 75% correct responses and were assessed again 4 hours and 2 weeks post-practice.

Results & Discussion

Children with DLD had fewer correct responses on the declarative-memory object location task with the gap widening significantly from 4 hours to 2 weeks post-training. On the procedural symbol-writing task, children with DLD showed overall lower accuracy. Furthermore, only their TD peers exhibited delayed gains 4 hours post-training in production times, while they narrowed the gap two weeks later. A speed–accuracy trade-off was observed during their symbol-writing practice. These results highlight atypical long-term declarative memory retention and procedural knowledge acquisition in DLD. Consistent with previous studies, declarative memory correlated with lexical scores in both groups, while procedural memory correlated with grammatical scores only in TD peers. Interestingly, long-term procedural learning was linked to lexical abilities in children with TD. Characterizing child performance in short and long intervals following practice may aid clinicians in supporting children with DLD beyond the clinical setting.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • Current studies emphasize the role of long-term memory in language learning, particularly procedural memory for grammar and declarative memory for lexical knowledge but often overlook longer term performance and non-sleep memory consolidation. Additionally, most research focuses on older children, with few studies addressing younger children at critical language acquisition ages, a gap this study aims to fill.

What this paper adds to the existing knowledge

  • The study shows that children with DLD exhibit atypical patterns in declarative and procedural memory post-training. It also establishes correlations between memory types and language skills, highlighting distinct memory challenges in children with DLD compared with their TD peers.

What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?

  • The clinical implications of this study highlight the need for targeted interventions to address post-practice memory deficits in children with DLD. The findings indicate that children with DLD struggle with both declarative and procedural memory tasks at different post-training intervals, suggesting the necessity for early, ongoing support. Personalized educational and clinical strategies that consider each child's unique memory profile can enhance language acquisition and overall learning outcomes, making tailored interventions crucial.

Abstract Image

发展性语言障碍儿童技能习得和记忆保留的挑战
背景了解发展性语言障碍(DLD)儿童与正常发展性语言障碍(TD)儿童的记忆保留情况,可以增强我们对记忆过程的认识。目的研究5岁DLD患儿在陈述性客体定位任务和程序性符号书写任务中的长期记忆巩固,以及语法和词汇技能。方法,共有23名DLD患儿和30名TD同伴参与。对于程序记忆,儿童练习书写一个新符号,并在练习后4小时和2周进行评估。对于陈述性记忆,他们练习定位卡片,直到答对75%,并在练习4小时和2周后再次进行评估。结果,DLD儿童在陈述性记忆对象定位任务上的正确反应较少,并且在训练后4小时到2周之间差距显著扩大。在程序性符号书写任务上,DLD患儿的准确率总体较低。此外,只有他们的TD同行在培训后4小时的生产时间中表现出延迟收益,而他们在两周后缩小了差距。在他们的符号书写练习中观察到速度和准确性之间的权衡。这些结果突出了非典型的长期陈述性记忆保留和程序性知识获取。与之前的研究一致,两组的陈述性记忆与词汇分数相关,而程序记忆仅与语法分数相关。有趣的是,长期程序性学习与TD儿童的词汇能力有关。在实践后的短时间和长时间间隔中描述儿童的表现可能有助于临床医生在临床环境之外支持患有DLD的儿童。当前的研究强调长期记忆在语言学习中的作用,特别是语法的程序性记忆和词汇知识的陈述性记忆,但往往忽视了长期表现和非睡眠记忆的巩固。此外,大多数研究都集中在年龄较大的儿童身上,很少有研究针对处于关键语言习得年龄的幼儿,本研究旨在填补这一空白。研究表明,DLD儿童在训练后的陈述性和程序性记忆表现出非典型的模式。它还建立了记忆类型和语言技能之间的相关性,突出了DLD儿童与TD同龄人相比的独特记忆挑战。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?本研究的临床意义强调了有针对性的干预措施的必要性,以解决DLD儿童的练习后记忆缺陷。研究结果表明,DLD儿童在不同的训练后间隔时间内都在陈述性和程序性记忆任务中挣扎,这表明早期持续支持的必要性。个性化的教育和临床策略考虑到每个孩子独特的记忆概况,可以提高语言习得和整体学习成果,使量身定制的干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信