Multisensorial Experiences in Early Modern Artefacts

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Tânia Manuel Casimiro, Joel Santos
{"title":"Multisensorial Experiences in Early Modern Artefacts","authors":"Tânia Manuel Casimiro,&nbsp;Joel Santos","doi":"10.1007/s11759-024-09521-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper introduces a novel, quantitative approach to examining how early modern Portuguese ceramics reflect multisensory experiences, impacting their value and desirability. Our method combines archaeological and historical evidence to define a framework for classifying and quantifying the sensory appeal of artefacts, focussing on ceramics that engage smell, taste, touch, sight, and occasionally sound. Using a representative sample of sixteenth–eighteenth century Portuguese ceramics—primarily drinking vessels and plates—we developed a four-step methodology: identifying samples, gathering sensory responses from users, quantifying these responses, and validating results against historical prices. Through this process, we explored how sensory appeal contributed to the objects’ cultural and economic significance. Findings show that ceramics evoking stronger sensory responses, especially those stimulating smell and taste, had higher market values and prestige, suggesting sensory richness as a force of economic and social desirability. This study provides a replicable methodology for sensory archaeology, opening pathways for further investigation of sensory experiences in material culture.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44740,"journal":{"name":"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress","volume":"21 1","pages":"181 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeologies-Journal of the World Archaeological Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11759-024-09521-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel, quantitative approach to examining how early modern Portuguese ceramics reflect multisensory experiences, impacting their value and desirability. Our method combines archaeological and historical evidence to define a framework for classifying and quantifying the sensory appeal of artefacts, focussing on ceramics that engage smell, taste, touch, sight, and occasionally sound. Using a representative sample of sixteenth–eighteenth century Portuguese ceramics—primarily drinking vessels and plates—we developed a four-step methodology: identifying samples, gathering sensory responses from users, quantifying these responses, and validating results against historical prices. Through this process, we explored how sensory appeal contributed to the objects’ cultural and economic significance. Findings show that ceramics evoking stronger sensory responses, especially those stimulating smell and taste, had higher market values and prestige, suggesting sensory richness as a force of economic and social desirability. This study provides a replicable methodology for sensory archaeology, opening pathways for further investigation of sensory experiences in material culture.

Abstract Image

早期现代人工制品的多感官体验
本文介绍了一种新颖的量化方法,用于研究早期现代葡萄牙陶瓷如何反映多感官体验,从而影响其价值和可取性。我们的方法结合了考古学和历史证据,确定了一个对工艺品的感官吸引力进行分类和量化的框架,重点关注陶瓷的嗅觉、味觉、触觉、视觉,偶尔还有听觉。利用十六至十八世纪葡萄牙陶瓷的代表性样本--主要是酒器和盘子--我们制定了一套四步方法:确定样本、收集使用者的感官反应、量化这些反应以及根据历史价格验证结果。通过这一过程,我们探究了感官吸引力如何促进了物品的文化和经济意义。研究结果表明,能唤起更强烈感官反应的陶瓷,尤其是那些能刺激嗅觉和味觉的陶瓷,具有更高的市场价值和声望,这表明丰富的感官是经济和社会需求的一种力量。这项研究为感官考古学提供了一种可复制的方法,为进一步研究物质文化中的感官体验开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress offers a venue for debates and topical issues, through peer-reviewed articles, reports and reviews. It emphasizes contributions that seek to recenter (or decenter) archaeology, and that challenge local and global power geometries. Areas of interest include ethics and archaeology; public archaeology; legacies of colonialism and nationalism within the discipline; the interplay of local and global archaeological traditions; theory and archaeology; the discipline’s involvement in projects of memory, identity, and restitution; and rights and ethics relating to cultural property, issues of acquisition, custodianship, conservation, and display. Recognizing the importance of non-Western epistemologies and intellectual traditions, the journal publishes some material in nonstandard format, including dialogues; annotated photographic essays; transcripts of public events; and statements from elders, custodians, descent groups and individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信