Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance metrics

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Viet Linh Dang , Shuping Wan , Jiequn Guo
{"title":"Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance metrics","authors":"Viet Linh Dang ,&nbsp;Shuping Wan ,&nbsp;Jiequn Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selecting third-party logistics (3PL) providers is a crucial strategic decision for organizations seeking to enhance supply chain performance in today's dynamic business environment. This study explores the advancement of decision-making approaches for 3PL outsourcing, analysing 121 research articles published from 2002 to 2024. Through a comprehensive systematic literature review supported by descriptive and keyword co-occurrence analyses, the study identifies three primary methodological approaches: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Mathematical Programming (MP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI), with MCDM emerging as the most preferred approach. These methodologies show promising advancements in addressing traditional limitations, adopting data-driven approaches, integrating hybrid methods, managing uncertainty, and refining criteria development processes. Based on an analysis of 1662 selection criteria from the literature, the study proposes an up-to-date and universally applicable three-layer criteria framework focusing on five key aspects: Business Strength and Prestige, Service Excellence, Cost and Pricing, Technology Capabilities, and Sustainability (measured by Environmental, Social, and Governance metrics). This framework, enhanced by insights from industry experts and top 3PL companies, reflects a shift toward more holistic 3PL evaluation and selection. The study contributes to decision science and management literature while providing valuable insights for supply chain professionals, concluding with suggestions for future research directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 109615"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting third-party logistics (3PL) providers is a crucial strategic decision for organizations seeking to enhance supply chain performance in today's dynamic business environment. This study explores the advancement of decision-making approaches for 3PL outsourcing, analysing 121 research articles published from 2002 to 2024. Through a comprehensive systematic literature review supported by descriptive and keyword co-occurrence analyses, the study identifies three primary methodological approaches: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Mathematical Programming (MP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI), with MCDM emerging as the most preferred approach. These methodologies show promising advancements in addressing traditional limitations, adopting data-driven approaches, integrating hybrid methods, managing uncertainty, and refining criteria development processes. Based on an analysis of 1662 selection criteria from the literature, the study proposes an up-to-date and universally applicable three-layer criteria framework focusing on five key aspects: Business Strength and Prestige, Service Excellence, Cost and Pricing, Technology Capabilities, and Sustainability (measured by Environmental, Social, and Governance metrics). This framework, enhanced by insights from industry experts and top 3PL companies, reflects a shift toward more holistic 3PL evaluation and selection. The study contributes to decision science and management literature while providing valuable insights for supply chain professionals, concluding with suggestions for future research directions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信