Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance metrics

IF 9.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Viet Linh Dang , Shuping Wan , Jiequn Guo
{"title":"Third-party logistics outsourcing: A review of two decades of advancing decision-making approaches with an up-to-date three-layer criteria framework integrating environmental, social, and governance metrics","authors":"Viet Linh Dang ,&nbsp;Shuping Wan ,&nbsp;Jiequn Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selecting third-party logistics (3PL) providers is a crucial strategic decision for organizations seeking to enhance supply chain performance in today's dynamic business environment. This study explores the advancement of decision-making approaches for 3PL outsourcing, analysing 121 research articles published from 2002 to 2024. Through a comprehensive systematic literature review supported by descriptive and keyword co-occurrence analyses, the study identifies three primary methodological approaches: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Mathematical Programming (MP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI), with MCDM emerging as the most preferred approach. These methodologies show promising advancements in addressing traditional limitations, adopting data-driven approaches, integrating hybrid methods, managing uncertainty, and refining criteria development processes. Based on an analysis of 1662 selection criteria from the literature, the study proposes an up-to-date and universally applicable three-layer criteria framework focusing on five key aspects: Business Strength and Prestige, Service Excellence, Cost and Pricing, Technology Capabilities, and Sustainability (measured by Environmental, Social, and Governance metrics). This framework, enhanced by insights from industry experts and top 3PL companies, reflects a shift toward more holistic 3PL evaluation and selection. The study contributes to decision science and management literature while providing valuable insights for supply chain professionals, concluding with suggestions for future research directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Production Economics","volume":"284 ","pages":"Article 109615"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Production Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527325001008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Selecting third-party logistics (3PL) providers is a crucial strategic decision for organizations seeking to enhance supply chain performance in today's dynamic business environment. This study explores the advancement of decision-making approaches for 3PL outsourcing, analysing 121 research articles published from 2002 to 2024. Through a comprehensive systematic literature review supported by descriptive and keyword co-occurrence analyses, the study identifies three primary methodological approaches: Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Mathematical Programming (MP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI), with MCDM emerging as the most preferred approach. These methodologies show promising advancements in addressing traditional limitations, adopting data-driven approaches, integrating hybrid methods, managing uncertainty, and refining criteria development processes. Based on an analysis of 1662 selection criteria from the literature, the study proposes an up-to-date and universally applicable three-layer criteria framework focusing on five key aspects: Business Strength and Prestige, Service Excellence, Cost and Pricing, Technology Capabilities, and Sustainability (measured by Environmental, Social, and Governance metrics). This framework, enhanced by insights from industry experts and top 3PL companies, reflects a shift toward more holistic 3PL evaluation and selection. The study contributes to decision science and management literature while providing valuable insights for supply chain professionals, concluding with suggestions for future research directions.
第三方物流外包:回顾二十年来先进的决策方法与最新的三层标准框架集成环境,社会和治理指标
选择第三方物流(3PL)供应商是在当今动态的商业环境中寻求提高供应链绩效的组织的关键战略决策。本研究探讨了第三方物流外包决策方法的进步,分析了2002年至2024年发表的121篇研究论文。通过全面系统的文献综述,辅以描述性和关键词共现分析,该研究确定了三种主要的方法方法:多标准决策(MCDM)、数学规划(MP)和人工智能(AI),其中MCDM是最受欢迎的方法。这些方法在解决传统限制、采用数据驱动方法、集成混合方法、管理不确定性和改进标准开发过程方面显示出有希望的进步。基于对文献中1662项选择标准的分析,该研究提出了一个最新的、普遍适用的三层标准框架,重点关注五个关键方面:商业实力和声誉、服务卓越、成本和定价、技术能力和可持续性(通过环境、社会和治理指标衡量)。该框架得到了行业专家和顶级第三方物流公司的强化,反映了向更全面的第三方物流评估和选择的转变。本研究对决策科学和管理文献有贡献,同时为供应链专业人员提供了有价值的见解,并对未来的研究方向提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Production Economics
International Journal of Production Economics 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
266
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Production Economics focuses on the interface between engineering and management. It covers all aspects of manufacturing and process industries, as well as production in general. The journal is interdisciplinary, considering activities throughout the product life cycle and material flow cycle. It aims to disseminate knowledge for improving industrial practice and strengthening the theoretical base for decision making. The journal serves as a forum for exchanging ideas and presenting new developments in theory and application, combining academic standards with practical value for industrial applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信