Partial adaptation for online-adaptive proton therapy triggered by during-delivery treatment verification: Feasibility study on prostate cancer treatments

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Virginia Gambetta , Victoria Pieta , Jonathan Berthold , Tobias Hölscher , Albin Fredriksson , Christian Richter , Kristin Stützer
{"title":"Partial adaptation for online-adaptive proton therapy triggered by during-delivery treatment verification: Feasibility study on prostate cancer treatments","authors":"Virginia Gambetta ,&nbsp;Victoria Pieta ,&nbsp;Jonathan Berthold ,&nbsp;Tobias Hölscher ,&nbsp;Albin Fredriksson ,&nbsp;Christian Richter ,&nbsp;Kristin Stützer","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2025.100755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><div>Online treatment verification during proton therapy delivery may detect deviations due to anatomical changes occurring along the treatment course and trigger immediate intervention, if necessary. We investigated the potential of partial plan adaptation in two-field prostate cancer treatments as a solution for online-adaptive proton therapy (OAPT) after the detection of relevant treatment deviations during the first field delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In a retrospective study, ten fractions from eight prostate cancer patients with prompt gamma imaging (PGI) detected treatment deviations, which were confirmed on respective in-room control computed tomography (cCT) scans, were considered. For each cCT, a dose-mimicking-based robust partial adaptation reoptimized the second field by considering the suboptimal dose delivery of the first non-adapted, PGI-monitored field. The results were compared to the non-adapted scenario and upfront full adaptation (both fields) in terms of achievable target coverage (prescription: 48 Gy/60 Gy to low-risk/high-risk target) and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Partially adapted plans showed comparable target coverage (median <em>D</em><sub>98%</sub>: 99.9%/98.0% for low-/high-risk target) to fully adapted plans (100.3%/98.7%) and were superior to non-adapted plans (98.7%/94.5%). Achievable OAR sparing was patient-specific depending on the proximity to the target region, but within clinical goals for the partially and fully adapted plans.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Partial adaptation triggered mid-delivery of a fraction can still generate plans of comparable conformity to full adaptation, even in the case of plans with only two, opposing fields. A verification-triggered OAPT may therefore become an alternative to upfront OAPT, saving time and imaging dose in fractions without relevant anatomy changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631625000600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Online treatment verification during proton therapy delivery may detect deviations due to anatomical changes occurring along the treatment course and trigger immediate intervention, if necessary. We investigated the potential of partial plan adaptation in two-field prostate cancer treatments as a solution for online-adaptive proton therapy (OAPT) after the detection of relevant treatment deviations during the first field delivery.

Materials and Methods

In a retrospective study, ten fractions from eight prostate cancer patients with prompt gamma imaging (PGI) detected treatment deviations, which were confirmed on respective in-room control computed tomography (cCT) scans, were considered. For each cCT, a dose-mimicking-based robust partial adaptation reoptimized the second field by considering the suboptimal dose delivery of the first non-adapted, PGI-monitored field. The results were compared to the non-adapted scenario and upfront full adaptation (both fields) in terms of achievable target coverage (prescription: 48 Gy/60 Gy to low-risk/high-risk target) and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing.

Results

Partially adapted plans showed comparable target coverage (median D98%: 99.9%/98.0% for low-/high-risk target) to fully adapted plans (100.3%/98.7%) and were superior to non-adapted plans (98.7%/94.5%). Achievable OAR sparing was patient-specific depending on the proximity to the target region, but within clinical goals for the partially and fully adapted plans.

Conclusions

Partial adaptation triggered mid-delivery of a fraction can still generate plans of comparable conformity to full adaptation, even in the case of plans with only two, opposing fields. A verification-triggered OAPT may therefore become an alternative to upfront OAPT, saving time and imaging dose in fractions without relevant anatomy changes.
传送过程中治疗验证触发在线自适应质子治疗的部分适应:前列腺癌治疗的可行性研究
背景和目的质子治疗过程中的在线治疗验证可以检测到治疗过程中发生的解剖变化引起的偏差,并在必要时触发立即干预。我们研究了两场前列腺癌治疗中部分计划适应的潜力,作为在线自适应质子治疗(OAPT)的解决方案,在第一次场输送过程中检测到相关的治疗偏差。材料与方法在一项回顾性研究中,考虑了8例前列腺癌患者的10个部位的快速伽马成像(PGI)检测到的治疗偏差,这些偏差在各自的室内对照计算机断层扫描(cCT)上被证实。对于每个cCT,基于剂量模拟的稳健部分适应通过考虑第一个非适应的pgi监测领域的次优剂量递送,重新优化了第二个领域。在可实现的目标覆盖范围(处方:48 Gy/60 Gy至低风险/高风险目标)和器官风险(OAR)保护方面,将结果与未适应情景和预先完全适应(两个领域)进行了比较。结果部分适应方案的目标覆盖率(低/高风险目标的中位数D98%: 99.9%/98.0%)与完全适应方案(100.3%/98.7%)相当,优于非适应方案(98.7%/94.5%)。可实现的OAR保留取决于与目标区域的接近程度,但在部分和完全适应计划的临床目标范围内。结论即使只有两个相反场的方案,部分适应触发的中期分娩仍然可以产生与完全适应相当的符合方案。因此,验证触发的OAPT可能成为前置OAPT的替代方案,节省了时间和成像剂量,而无需进行相关的解剖改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信