Does land leasing encourage ecological conservation practices among Chinese maize farmers?

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yitian Jin , Kunyang Zhang , Yi Luo , Laping Wu
{"title":"Does land leasing encourage ecological conservation practices among Chinese maize farmers?","authors":"Yitian Jin ,&nbsp;Kunyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yi Luo ,&nbsp;Laping Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As global agricultural demands rise, the imperative to balance enhanced land productivity with ecological system protection becomes increasingly critical. To elucidate how differences in land ownership affect farmers' ecological protection behaviors on owned versus leased land, this paper develops a conceptual model linking land leasing with the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices, which is grounded in the duration of land contracts. An empirical analysis was conducted using data from 71373 samples collected through the China National Agricultural Product Cost and Benefits Survey (CNACBS) from 2004 to 2022. The results indicate that farmers with a greater proportion of leased land are less likely to adopt ecological farming practices. Specifically, leasing land significantly increases the use of fertilizers and pesticides by maize growers, whereas the use of manure decreases. However, land title certification can effectively mitigate the inhibitory effect of leased land on farmers' farmland ecological protection behaviors. Additionally, farmers with experiences of tenancy insecurity, due to past instability in land tenure and policy changes, exhibit a more conservative approach to long-term investments and continuous management of land. Compared with those in plains regions, farmers in mountainous areas are more inclined to adopt strategies that excessively use fertilizers and pesticides to maximize short-term economic benefits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107547"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772500081X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As global agricultural demands rise, the imperative to balance enhanced land productivity with ecological system protection becomes increasingly critical. To elucidate how differences in land ownership affect farmers' ecological protection behaviors on owned versus leased land, this paper develops a conceptual model linking land leasing with the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices, which is grounded in the duration of land contracts. An empirical analysis was conducted using data from 71373 samples collected through the China National Agricultural Product Cost and Benefits Survey (CNACBS) from 2004 to 2022. The results indicate that farmers with a greater proportion of leased land are less likely to adopt ecological farming practices. Specifically, leasing land significantly increases the use of fertilizers and pesticides by maize growers, whereas the use of manure decreases. However, land title certification can effectively mitigate the inhibitory effect of leased land on farmers' farmland ecological protection behaviors. Additionally, farmers with experiences of tenancy insecurity, due to past instability in land tenure and policy changes, exhibit a more conservative approach to long-term investments and continuous management of land. Compared with those in plains regions, farmers in mountainous areas are more inclined to adopt strategies that excessively use fertilizers and pesticides to maximize short-term economic benefits.
土地租赁是否鼓励了中国玉米种植者的生态保护实践?
随着全球农业需求的增加,平衡提高土地生产力与保护生态系统的必要性变得越来越重要。为了阐明土地所有权差异如何影响农民在自有土地和租赁土地上的生态保护行为,本文建立了一个以土地合同期限为基础的概念模型,将土地租赁与采用可持续农业实践联系起来。利用2004 - 2022年全国农产品成本效益调查(CNACBS)收集的71373份样本数据进行实证分析。结果表明,拥有较大比例租赁土地的农民不太可能采用生态耕作方式。具体来说,租赁土地显著增加了玉米种植者对化肥和农药的使用,而减少了肥料的使用。而土地权证可以有效缓解土地出让对农民农田生态保护行为的抑制作用。此外,由于过去土地所有权的不稳定和政策变化,经历过租赁不安全的农民对长期投资和土地的持续管理表现出更保守的态度。与平原地区相比,山区农民更倾向于采取过度使用化肥和农药的策略来最大化短期经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信