Comparative analysis of inertial measurement units and markerless video motion capture systems for assessing rotational parameters in snowboard freestyle
Tom Gorges , Christian Merz , Felix Friedl , Ingo Sandau
{"title":"Comparative analysis of inertial measurement units and markerless video motion capture systems for assessing rotational parameters in snowboard freestyle","authors":"Tom Gorges , Christian Merz , Felix Friedl , Ingo Sandau","doi":"10.1016/j.measen.2025.101872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In snowboard freestyle, the measured amount of rotation (mAR) is a key judging criteria. Rotational parameters like angular velocity (AV) support athletes and coaches in performance enhancements. This study evaluates the validity of on-snow available inertial measurement unit (IMU) data with a markerless optical tracking system. Eight elite snowboard riders performed 88 tricks with a bounce board on a trampoline that were concurrently measured using a board-mounted IMU and a video motion capture system (criterion). The validity of the IMU was determined for discrete (mAR) and time-series (AV) data via t-test, effect size (d), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), standard deviation of differences (SDD), and bias ±limits of agreement (LoA). For discrete data, results indicated excellent absolute and relative concurrent validity of mAR (SDD = ±8.18°; SDD% = ±1.42%; CCC = 0.998; bias ± LoA = 1.80° ± 16.02°) despite significant mean differences (p <span><math><mo><</mo></math></span> 0.05; d <span><math><mrow><mo><</mo><mrow><mo>|</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>|</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span>) between both systems. For time-series data, acceptable absolute and relative concurrent validity exist for AV (mean SDD <span><math><mo><</mo></math></span> 45°; mean SDD% <span><math><mo><</mo></math></span> 10%; mean CCC <span><math><mo>></mo></math></span> 0.9; bias ± LoA = −0.19°/s ± 87.48°/s) showing significant mean differences only in the first 1% of the time-series (p <span><math><mo><</mo></math></span> 0.05; d <span><math><mrow><mo>></mo><mspace></mspace><mrow><mo>|</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>|</mo></mrow></mrow></math></span>). In conclusion, using a board-mounted IMU is a valid approach to measure rotational parameters in snowboard freestyle, highlighting IMUs’ potential for on-field performance analysis. Nonetheless, caution is advised when interpreting AV at individual time points due to the observed variability, especially in close temporal proximity to take-off and landing events.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34311,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Sensors","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 101872"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917425000662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In snowboard freestyle, the measured amount of rotation (mAR) is a key judging criteria. Rotational parameters like angular velocity (AV) support athletes and coaches in performance enhancements. This study evaluates the validity of on-snow available inertial measurement unit (IMU) data with a markerless optical tracking system. Eight elite snowboard riders performed 88 tricks with a bounce board on a trampoline that were concurrently measured using a board-mounted IMU and a video motion capture system (criterion). The validity of the IMU was determined for discrete (mAR) and time-series (AV) data via t-test, effect size (d), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), standard deviation of differences (SDD), and bias ±limits of agreement (LoA). For discrete data, results indicated excellent absolute and relative concurrent validity of mAR (SDD = ±8.18°; SDD% = ±1.42%; CCC = 0.998; bias ± LoA = 1.80° ± 16.02°) despite significant mean differences (p 0.05; d ) between both systems. For time-series data, acceptable absolute and relative concurrent validity exist for AV (mean SDD 45°; mean SDD% 10%; mean CCC 0.9; bias ± LoA = −0.19°/s ± 87.48°/s) showing significant mean differences only in the first 1% of the time-series (p 0.05; d ). In conclusion, using a board-mounted IMU is a valid approach to measure rotational parameters in snowboard freestyle, highlighting IMUs’ potential for on-field performance analysis. Nonetheless, caution is advised when interpreting AV at individual time points due to the observed variability, especially in close temporal proximity to take-off and landing events.