Robust and reusable LINDDUN privacy threat knowledge

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Laurens Sion, Dimitri Van Landuyt, Kim Wuyts, Wouter Joosen
{"title":"Robust and reusable LINDDUN privacy threat knowledge","authors":"Laurens Sion,&nbsp;Dimitri Van Landuyt,&nbsp;Kim Wuyts,&nbsp;Wouter Joosen","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2025.104419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Privacy threat modeling is an intrinsically complex analysis task that requires expertise in sophisticated privacy threats, their harms and implications, as well as potential mitigations. To support both novices and experts in attaining a desired degree of rigor and completeness in their analysis, supporting materials such as privacy threat trees and threat examples are crucial as they consolidate and harmonize the complete spectrum of threat characteristics, and as such assist with the broader uptake of privacy threat modeling practices.</div><div>However, the existing knowledge structures, taxonomies, and trees used in privacy threat analysis prove to have limited use in practice. They are either too broad and generic, or too tightly coupled to a specific modeling approach (<span>dfd</span>s) or to a specific threat elicitation method (e.g., per-element). In addition, current privacy threat knowledge structures suffer from semantic ambiguity. Finally, existing structures are too rigid to support evolution, thus hindering the incorporation of emerging privacy threats.</div><div>This article introduces three contributions to address these shortcomings: (i) it defines the metamodel to express threat knowledge in the form of threat types, elicitation criteria, examples, and additional metadata; (ii) it discusses its application to the privacy threat knowledge of the <span>linddun</span> privacy threat modeling framework; and (iii) it introduces the automated knowledge management tools comprised of extraction logic that allows more flexible adoption in different privacy analysis approaches, and that fundamentally supports continuous evolution and refinement of this privacy threat knowledge. A major outcome is the updated <span>linddun</span> privacy threat knowledge which completely subsumes earlier versions and provides more rooted support for adoption, refinement, and continuous evolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 104419"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404825001087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Privacy threat modeling is an intrinsically complex analysis task that requires expertise in sophisticated privacy threats, their harms and implications, as well as potential mitigations. To support both novices and experts in attaining a desired degree of rigor and completeness in their analysis, supporting materials such as privacy threat trees and threat examples are crucial as they consolidate and harmonize the complete spectrum of threat characteristics, and as such assist with the broader uptake of privacy threat modeling practices.
However, the existing knowledge structures, taxonomies, and trees used in privacy threat analysis prove to have limited use in practice. They are either too broad and generic, or too tightly coupled to a specific modeling approach (dfds) or to a specific threat elicitation method (e.g., per-element). In addition, current privacy threat knowledge structures suffer from semantic ambiguity. Finally, existing structures are too rigid to support evolution, thus hindering the incorporation of emerging privacy threats.
This article introduces three contributions to address these shortcomings: (i) it defines the metamodel to express threat knowledge in the form of threat types, elicitation criteria, examples, and additional metadata; (ii) it discusses its application to the privacy threat knowledge of the linddun privacy threat modeling framework; and (iii) it introduces the automated knowledge management tools comprised of extraction logic that allows more flexible adoption in different privacy analysis approaches, and that fundamentally supports continuous evolution and refinement of this privacy threat knowledge. A major outcome is the updated linddun privacy threat knowledge which completely subsumes earlier versions and provides more rooted support for adoption, refinement, and continuous evolution.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信