Incentivizing digitalization: CEO compensation and digitalization in China's A-share corporate landscape

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
R.M. Ammar Zahid , Umer Sahil Maqsood , Murtaza Hussain , Muhammad Waleed Younas
{"title":"Incentivizing digitalization: CEO compensation and digitalization in China's A-share corporate landscape","authors":"R.M. Ammar Zahid ,&nbsp;Umer Sahil Maqsood ,&nbsp;Murtaza Hussain ,&nbsp;Muhammad Waleed Younas","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Executives’ compensation structures can strongly affect the ability and readiness of companies to undertake digital transformation (DT) initiatives. This study investigates the intricate dynamics among CEO compensation and DT within Chinese public companies over the period from 2010 to 2023. The analysis identified three principal findings. Firstly, there is a positive association between the CEO paygap and DT, indicating that greater compensation disparities incentivize CEOs to pursue technological advancements. Secondly, managerial shareholding significantly positively moderates this relationship, likely due to the alignment of managerial and shareholder interests. Thirdly, this influence is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises compared to non-state-owned enterprises. This could be due to different governance structures and objectives in state-owned entities. Moreover, government regulations aimed at controlling CEO compensation are found to dampen DT efforts, suggesting that such constraints might hinder digital innovation. Channel analysis reveals agency costs and audit quality as key mediators that help to align the CEOs interests in support of DT. Various methodological approaches, such as instrumental variables (IV) and propensity score matching (PSM), validate the robustness of these results. Findings highlight the need for a balanced approach to CEO compensation and regulation to foster DT. Policymakers should consider the potential unintended consequences of stringent compensation regulations on technological advancement. Companies are encouraged to align managerial incentives with shareholder interests through shareholding schemes to enhance DT efforts. These findings provide a framework for comprehending and managing executive compensation dynamics in the context of digital transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102888"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Executives’ compensation structures can strongly affect the ability and readiness of companies to undertake digital transformation (DT) initiatives. This study investigates the intricate dynamics among CEO compensation and DT within Chinese public companies over the period from 2010 to 2023. The analysis identified three principal findings. Firstly, there is a positive association between the CEO paygap and DT, indicating that greater compensation disparities incentivize CEOs to pursue technological advancements. Secondly, managerial shareholding significantly positively moderates this relationship, likely due to the alignment of managerial and shareholder interests. Thirdly, this influence is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises compared to non-state-owned enterprises. This could be due to different governance structures and objectives in state-owned entities. Moreover, government regulations aimed at controlling CEO compensation are found to dampen DT efforts, suggesting that such constraints might hinder digital innovation. Channel analysis reveals agency costs and audit quality as key mediators that help to align the CEOs interests in support of DT. Various methodological approaches, such as instrumental variables (IV) and propensity score matching (PSM), validate the robustness of these results. Findings highlight the need for a balanced approach to CEO compensation and regulation to foster DT. Policymakers should consider the potential unintended consequences of stringent compensation regulations on technological advancement. Companies are encouraged to align managerial incentives with shareholder interests through shareholding schemes to enhance DT efforts. These findings provide a framework for comprehending and managing executive compensation dynamics in the context of digital transformation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信