Preserved Finger Flexion in Brachial Plexus Total Lesion: A Study of 16 Cases Among 989 Surgical Patients

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jayme A. Bertelli MD, PhD , Christopher S. Crowe MD , Mohammed Tahir MD, MSc , Marco F. Ghizoni MD, MSc
{"title":"Preserved Finger Flexion in Brachial Plexus Total Lesion: A Study of 16 Cases Among 989 Surgical Patients","authors":"Jayme A. Bertelli MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Christopher S. Crowe MD ,&nbsp;Mohammed Tahir MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Marco F. Ghizoni MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brachial plexus traction injuries have conventionally been categorized as involving the C5–C6, C5–C7, C5–T1, and C8–T1 roots. In this article, we report a distinct clinical presentation of brachial plexus injury characterized by intact finger flexion with signs of complete brachial plexus injury.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2010 to 2022, 989 patients who sustained brachial plexus injuries were examined and underwent surgery. Prior to surgery, brachial plexus computed tomography myelography was obtained. A total of 16 patients (1.6%) with preserved finger flexion and panplexus injury were identified. Upper root exploration and spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer were performed as indicated. Transfer of median nerve fascicles to the biceps motor branch was used to reconstruct elbow flexion in 11 cases, whereas fascicles from the ulnar nerve were transferred in two. Two patients underwent C5 root grafting to the musculocutaneous nerve. In one case, intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer was performed. Twelve patients had adequate follow-up (average, 18.5 months).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Horner sign and imaging studies demonstrating C8 and T1 root avulsion were noted in all cases. Finger flexion was partially preserved in all patients with variable involvement of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. Little finger flexor digitorum profundus and flexor carpi ulnaris were always paralyzed. After surgery, an average shoulder abduction of 60° was achieved, whereas elbow flexion recovered in 11 of 12 patients (91.7%), M4 in seven cases, and M3 in four cases. Four of 13 patients (28.6%) who underwent nerve transfer using the median nerve as a donor exhibited a reduction in finger flexion strength or a loss of motion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrates a distinct clinical presentation of brachial plexus trauma, characterized by preserved finger flexion despite complete plexus injury.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"50 4","pages":"Pages 416-423"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502324006129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Brachial plexus traction injuries have conventionally been categorized as involving the C5–C6, C5–C7, C5–T1, and C8–T1 roots. In this article, we report a distinct clinical presentation of brachial plexus injury characterized by intact finger flexion with signs of complete brachial plexus injury.

Methods

From 2010 to 2022, 989 patients who sustained brachial plexus injuries were examined and underwent surgery. Prior to surgery, brachial plexus computed tomography myelography was obtained. A total of 16 patients (1.6%) with preserved finger flexion and panplexus injury were identified. Upper root exploration and spinal accessory to suprascapular nerve transfer were performed as indicated. Transfer of median nerve fascicles to the biceps motor branch was used to reconstruct elbow flexion in 11 cases, whereas fascicles from the ulnar nerve were transferred in two. Two patients underwent C5 root grafting to the musculocutaneous nerve. In one case, intercostal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer was performed. Twelve patients had adequate follow-up (average, 18.5 months).

Results

Horner sign and imaging studies demonstrating C8 and T1 root avulsion were noted in all cases. Finger flexion was partially preserved in all patients with variable involvement of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. Little finger flexor digitorum profundus and flexor carpi ulnaris were always paralyzed. After surgery, an average shoulder abduction of 60° was achieved, whereas elbow flexion recovered in 11 of 12 patients (91.7%), M4 in seven cases, and M3 in four cases. Four of 13 patients (28.6%) who underwent nerve transfer using the median nerve as a donor exhibited a reduction in finger flexion strength or a loss of motion.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a distinct clinical presentation of brachial plexus trauma, characterized by preserved finger flexion despite complete plexus injury.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信