Mitigating social polarization in video sharing platform using unbiased recommendation system: A case study of South Korea political youtube channels

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Giang T.C. Tran , Jason J. Jung , Jeonghun Han
{"title":"Mitigating social polarization in video sharing platform using unbiased recommendation system: A case study of South Korea political youtube channels","authors":"Giang T.C. Tran ,&nbsp;Jason J. Jung ,&nbsp;Jeonghun Han","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a digital age marked by surging polarization and the rise of echo chambers on video-sharing platforms, the imperative for unbiased, diverse content recommendation systems has never been more apparent. This study aims to propose a novel approach for building an unbiased recommendation system on a video-sharing platform to address the issue of escalating polarization and biased content. Our novel system targets the heart of social polarization, aiming to provide users with balanced exposure to a spectrum of perspectives on contentious issues. By integrating advanced techniques for polarity measurement, harnessing user activity, and leveraging video characteristics, we have constructed an innovative unbiased recommendation system. Commencing with seed channels, we collect sample data to establish user activity models and gauge the bias of each channel. The comprehensive feature set we utilize includes video titles, hashtags, posting times, comment distribution, and active users, each meticulously embedded to ensure the utmost precision in addressing user preferences. The output of the model is designed to provide users seeking relevant videos for social events without polarization bias. We use political polarization as a representative case, amassing data from Korean Political YouTube channels via our TubePlunger system. Beginning with six seed channels and approximately one million users, we analyzed more than six million comments on 24,000 videos to create an expansive dataset, eventually encompassing over 50 other relevant channels. More than 80% of survey participants agree that our system offers a means to achieve information balance across the political spectrum, in contrast to YouTube recommendations. They view TubePlunger as a valuable solution for addressing media-related social polarization issues. This proposed recommendation system approach has the potential to encourage a more equitable and informed political discourse, curbing polarization and enhancing democratic engagement in the online realm. This research signifies a pivotal stride in the realm of unbiased recommendation systems, transcending politics to extend its influence across diverse fields, providing balanced perspectives and bridging divides in a polarized digital world.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102881"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a digital age marked by surging polarization and the rise of echo chambers on video-sharing platforms, the imperative for unbiased, diverse content recommendation systems has never been more apparent. This study aims to propose a novel approach for building an unbiased recommendation system on a video-sharing platform to address the issue of escalating polarization and biased content. Our novel system targets the heart of social polarization, aiming to provide users with balanced exposure to a spectrum of perspectives on contentious issues. By integrating advanced techniques for polarity measurement, harnessing user activity, and leveraging video characteristics, we have constructed an innovative unbiased recommendation system. Commencing with seed channels, we collect sample data to establish user activity models and gauge the bias of each channel. The comprehensive feature set we utilize includes video titles, hashtags, posting times, comment distribution, and active users, each meticulously embedded to ensure the utmost precision in addressing user preferences. The output of the model is designed to provide users seeking relevant videos for social events without polarization bias. We use political polarization as a representative case, amassing data from Korean Political YouTube channels via our TubePlunger system. Beginning with six seed channels and approximately one million users, we analyzed more than six million comments on 24,000 videos to create an expansive dataset, eventually encompassing over 50 other relevant channels. More than 80% of survey participants agree that our system offers a means to achieve information balance across the political spectrum, in contrast to YouTube recommendations. They view TubePlunger as a valuable solution for addressing media-related social polarization issues. This proposed recommendation system approach has the potential to encourage a more equitable and informed political discourse, curbing polarization and enhancing democratic engagement in the online realm. This research signifies a pivotal stride in the realm of unbiased recommendation systems, transcending politics to extend its influence across diverse fields, providing balanced perspectives and bridging divides in a polarized digital world.
利用无偏推荐系统缓解视频分享平台的社会两极分化——以韩国政治youtube频道为例
在一个以两极分化加剧和视频分享平台回音室兴起为标志的数字时代,建立公正、多样化的内容推荐系统的必要性从未像现在这样明显。本研究旨在提出一种在视频分享平台上构建无偏见推荐系统的新方法,以解决日益加剧的两极分化和有偏见的内容问题。我们的新系统针对社会两极分化的核心,旨在为用户提供对有争议问题的各种观点的平衡暴露。通过整合先进的极性测量技术,利用用户活动,并利用视频特征,我们构建了一个创新的无偏见推荐系统。从种子渠道开始,我们收集样本数据来建立用户活动模型并衡量每个渠道的偏差。我们利用的综合功能集包括视频标题、话题标签、发布时间、评论分发和活跃用户,每个功能都经过精心嵌入,以确保最大限度地精确处理用户偏好。该模型的输出旨在为寻找社交事件相关视频的用户提供无极化偏见的服务。我们以政治两极化为代表,通过TubePlunger系统收集了韩国政治YouTube频道的数据。从6个种子频道和大约100万用户开始,我们分析了24,000个视频的600多万条评论,以创建一个庞大的数据集,最终包括50多个其他相关频道。超过80%的调查参与者同意,与YouTube的推荐相比,我们的系统提供了一种实现政治范围内信息平衡的手段。他们认为TubePlunger是解决与媒体相关的社会两极分化问题的有价值的解决方案。这种建议的推荐系统方法有可能鼓励更公平和知情的政治话语,遏制两极分化,增强在线领域的民主参与。这项研究标志着无偏见推荐系统领域的关键一步,超越了政治,将其影响力扩展到不同领域,提供了平衡的观点,并在两极分化的数字世界中弥合了分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信