Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Ischemic Stroke Incidence: A Case-Control Study on the CABANA Trial.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1111/pace.15186
En-Ze Li, Zhen Cao, Xiao-Xia Liu, Chang-Sheng Ma
{"title":"Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Ischemic Stroke Incidence: A Case-Control Study on the CABANA Trial.","authors":"En-Ze Li, Zhen Cao, Xiao-Xia Liu, Chang-Sheng Ma","doi":"10.1111/pace.15186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between the burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the risk of ischemic stroke is crucial yet complex. This study examines this relationship to enhance stroke prediction in patients with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CABANA trial study from 2009 to 2016 analyzed the relationship between AF load, stroke, and anticoagulation. We matched age, gender, and race, as well as the control and case groups, at 1:4. Non-invasive electrocardiogram monitoring recorded load events and included the total cumulative load in the calculation. Next, we compared the net load between the stroke and control groups, and the relationship between net AF load and stroke was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. This study also explored the interplay between stroke, AF load, and anticoagulation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first independent predictor of ischemic stroke risk is the net AF load (OR = 8.72, 95% CI: 3.11-24.4, p < 0.001). Stratified by the CHA2DS2VASc score, no significant change in net AF load between the high-risk and low-risk groups was observed (p = 0.96). Finally, we categorized all patients into adequate and inadequate anticoagulation groups based on whether they received adequate anticoagulation. The net AF load in the adequate anticoagulation group was higher than in the inadequate anticoagulation group (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AF burden is significantly associated with the risk of ischemic stroke. Determining the threshold of AF burden can improve stroke prevention strategies, indicating the need for targeted research on risk stratification and management of patients with AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"513-522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between the burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the risk of ischemic stroke is crucial yet complex. This study examines this relationship to enhance stroke prediction in patients with AF.

Methods: The CABANA trial study from 2009 to 2016 analyzed the relationship between AF load, stroke, and anticoagulation. We matched age, gender, and race, as well as the control and case groups, at 1:4. Non-invasive electrocardiogram monitoring recorded load events and included the total cumulative load in the calculation. Next, we compared the net load between the stroke and control groups, and the relationship between net AF load and stroke was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. This study also explored the interplay between stroke, AF load, and anticoagulation.

Results: The first independent predictor of ischemic stroke risk is the net AF load (OR = 8.72, 95% CI: 3.11-24.4, p < 0.001). Stratified by the CHA2DS2VASc score, no significant change in net AF load between the high-risk and low-risk groups was observed (p = 0.96). Finally, we categorized all patients into adequate and inadequate anticoagulation groups based on whether they received adequate anticoagulation. The net AF load in the adequate anticoagulation group was higher than in the inadequate anticoagulation group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: AF burden is significantly associated with the risk of ischemic stroke. Determining the threshold of AF burden can improve stroke prevention strategies, indicating the need for targeted research on risk stratification and management of patients with AF.

心房颤动负担与缺血性中风发病率之间的关系:CABANA 试验的病例对照研究。
背景:心房颤动(房颤)负担与缺血性卒中风险之间的关系至关重要,但也很复杂。本研究探讨了这一关系,以加强对房颤患者卒中的预测:2009 年至 2016 年的 CABANA 试验研究分析了房颤负荷、卒中和抗凝之间的关系。我们将年龄、性别、种族以及对照组和病例组按 1:4 进行了匹配。无创心电图监测记录了负荷事件,并将总累积负荷纳入计算。接下来,我们比较了中风组和对照组的净负荷,并使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析了净房颤负荷与中风之间的关系。本研究还探讨了中风、房颤负荷和抗凝之间的相互作用:结果:缺血性卒中风险的第一个独立预测因子是净房颤负荷(OR = 8.72,95% CI:3.11-24.4,P 结论:房颤负荷与卒中风险显著相关:房颤负荷与缺血性脑卒中风险密切相关。确定房颤负荷的阈值可改善卒中预防策略,这表明需要对房颤患者的风险分层和管理进行有针对性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信