Evaluation of a rapid lateral flow assay for the detection of taeniosis and cysticercosis at district hospital level in Tanzania: A prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0012310
Inge Van Damme, Chiara Trevisan, Mwemezi Kabululu, Dominik Stelzle, Charles E Makasi, Veronika Schmidt-Urbaneja, Kabemba E Mwape, Chishimba Mubanga, Gideon Zulu, Karen Shou Møller, Famke Jansen, Dries Reynders, John Noh, Sukwan Handali, Emmanuel Bottieau, Andrea S Winkler, Pierre Dorny, Pascal Magnussen, Sarah Gabriël, Bernard Ngowi
{"title":"Evaluation of a rapid lateral flow assay for the detection of taeniosis and cysticercosis at district hospital level in Tanzania: A prospective multicentre diagnostic accuracy study.","authors":"Inge Van Damme, Chiara Trevisan, Mwemezi Kabululu, Dominik Stelzle, Charles E Makasi, Veronika Schmidt-Urbaneja, Kabemba E Mwape, Chishimba Mubanga, Gideon Zulu, Karen Shou Møller, Famke Jansen, Dries Reynders, John Noh, Sukwan Handali, Emmanuel Bottieau, Andrea S Winkler, Pierre Dorny, Pascal Magnussen, Sarah Gabriël, Bernard Ngowi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0012310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The TS POC test, Taenia solium point-of-care test, is a two-strip lateral flow assay using the recombinant antigen rES33 on the TS POC T test strip, and rT24H on the TS POC CC test strip, to detect antibodies against T. solium taeniosis and cysticercosis, respectively. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the TS POC test for the detection of T. solium taeniosis and cysticercosis in individuals attending district hospitals in Tanzania. In this prospective two-phase diagnostic accuracy study, we recruited participants aged 10 and above, excluding pregnant women and those with acute severe illness. Participants were consecutively recruited in three cohorts according to their signs/symptoms: compatible with neurocysticercosis (cohort 1), intestinal worm infections (cohort 2), and other signs/symptoms (cohort 3). Lacking a gold standard test for both infections, diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using results of two coprological and two serological tests for taeniosis, and three serological tests for cysticercosis, in a Bayesian Latent Class Model approach. The TS POC test was conducted on 601 participants in cohort 1, 1661 participants in cohort 2, and 662 participants in cohort 3. Most individuals tested negative on both TS POC test strips, with proportions of 83% (n = 496), 97% (n = 1613) and 97% (n = 641) in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Complete case data were available for 120, 114, and 53 participants for taeniosis, and 126, 122, and 55 participants for cysticercosis. Sensitivity values for the TS POC T test strip were 50.2% [95% credible interval 4.9 - 96.4], 40.8% [2.2 - 95.2], and 40.4% [2.3 - 95.0], while specificity values were 98.6% [97.1 - 99.6], 99.3% [98.7 - 99.7] and 99.4% [98.5 - 99.9], respectively. For the TS POC CC test strip, the sensitivity was 77.5% [37.8 - 99.2], 24.9% [95% CI 6.4 - 52.7] and 44.2% [6.6 - 91.5], and the specificity 92.3% [86.5 - 98.8], 99.1% [97.8 - 100], and 98.1% [96.1 - 99.7] across the respective cohorts. Although the TS POC test has a low sensitivity, it demonstrates a high specificity, which may have clinical utility to guide treatment and diagnostic decisions, or in epidemiological studies. An important strength of this study lies in its assessment of the TS POC test under real-world conditions, revealing divergent estimates across distinct cohorts. The study underscores the suboptimal performance of existing tests under field conditions, emphasizing the need to enhance and validate these tests for better performance in practical real-world settings. Registration number: PACTR201712002788898.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 3","pages":"e0012310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0012310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The TS POC test, Taenia solium point-of-care test, is a two-strip lateral flow assay using the recombinant antigen rES33 on the TS POC T test strip, and rT24H on the TS POC CC test strip, to detect antibodies against T. solium taeniosis and cysticercosis, respectively. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the TS POC test for the detection of T. solium taeniosis and cysticercosis in individuals attending district hospitals in Tanzania. In this prospective two-phase diagnostic accuracy study, we recruited participants aged 10 and above, excluding pregnant women and those with acute severe illness. Participants were consecutively recruited in three cohorts according to their signs/symptoms: compatible with neurocysticercosis (cohort 1), intestinal worm infections (cohort 2), and other signs/symptoms (cohort 3). Lacking a gold standard test for both infections, diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using results of two coprological and two serological tests for taeniosis, and three serological tests for cysticercosis, in a Bayesian Latent Class Model approach. The TS POC test was conducted on 601 participants in cohort 1, 1661 participants in cohort 2, and 662 participants in cohort 3. Most individuals tested negative on both TS POC test strips, with proportions of 83% (n = 496), 97% (n = 1613) and 97% (n = 641) in cohorts 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Complete case data were available for 120, 114, and 53 participants for taeniosis, and 126, 122, and 55 participants for cysticercosis. Sensitivity values for the TS POC T test strip were 50.2% [95% credible interval 4.9 - 96.4], 40.8% [2.2 - 95.2], and 40.4% [2.3 - 95.0], while specificity values were 98.6% [97.1 - 99.6], 99.3% [98.7 - 99.7] and 99.4% [98.5 - 99.9], respectively. For the TS POC CC test strip, the sensitivity was 77.5% [37.8 - 99.2], 24.9% [95% CI 6.4 - 52.7] and 44.2% [6.6 - 91.5], and the specificity 92.3% [86.5 - 98.8], 99.1% [97.8 - 100], and 98.1% [96.1 - 99.7] across the respective cohorts. Although the TS POC test has a low sensitivity, it demonstrates a high specificity, which may have clinical utility to guide treatment and diagnostic decisions, or in epidemiological studies. An important strength of this study lies in its assessment of the TS POC test under real-world conditions, revealing divergent estimates across distinct cohorts. The study underscores the suboptimal performance of existing tests under field conditions, emphasizing the need to enhance and validate these tests for better performance in practical real-world settings. Registration number: PACTR201712002788898.

评估在坦桑尼亚地区医院水平检测带状绦虫病和囊虫病的快速横向流动试验:一项前瞻性多中心诊断准确性研究。
猪带绦虫即时检测(TS POC)是一种双条带横向流动试验,在TS POC T试纸上使用重组抗原rES33,在TS POC CC试纸上使用rT24H,分别检测猪带绦虫绦虫病和囊虫病的抗体。本研究的目的是评估在坦桑尼亚地区医院就诊的个体中,TS POC检测猪绦虫绦虫病和囊虫病的诊断性能。在这项前瞻性两期诊断准确性研究中,我们招募了年龄在10岁及以上的参与者,排除了孕妇和急性重症患者。参与者根据他们的体征/症状被连续招募为三个队列:与神经囊虫病(队列1)、肠道蠕虫感染(队列2)和其他体征/症状(队列3)相容。由于缺乏对这两种感染的金标准测试,因此在贝叶斯潜在分类模型方法中,使用绦虫病的两种coological和两种血清学测试结果以及囊虫病的三种血清学测试结果来评估诊断准确性。对队列1 601人、队列2 1661人、队列3 662人进行TS POC测试。大多数个体在TS POC试纸上均呈阴性,在队列1、2和3中分别为83% (n = 496)、97% (n = 1613)和97% (n = 641)。完整的病例数据包括120、114和53名绦虫病患者,以及126、122和55名囊虫病患者。TS POC T试纸条的敏感性为50.2%[95%可信区间4.9 ~ 96.4]、40.8%[2.2 ~ 95.2]和40.4%[2.3 ~ 95.0],特异性分别为98.6%[97.1 ~ 99.6]、99.3%[98.7 ~ 99.7]和99.4%[98.5 ~ 99.9]。TS POC CC试纸的敏感性分别为77.5%[37.8 ~ 99.2]、24.9% [95% CI 6.4 ~ 52.7]和44.2%[6.6 ~ 91.5],特异性分别为92.3%[86.5 ~ 98.8]、99.1%[97.8 ~ 100]和98.1%[96.1 ~ 99.7]。虽然TS POC检测的敏感性较低,但它具有很高的特异性,这可能在指导治疗和诊断决策或流行病学研究中具有临床应用价值。这项研究的一个重要优势在于它在真实世界条件下对TS POC测试的评估,揭示了不同队列之间的不同估计。该研究强调了现有测试在现场条件下的不理想性能,强调需要加强和验证这些测试,以便在实际的现实环境中获得更好的性能。注册号:PACTR201712002788898。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases PARASITOLOGY-TROPICAL MEDICINE
自引率
10.50%
发文量
723
期刊介绍: PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy. The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability. All aspects of these diseases are considered, including: Pathogenesis Clinical features Pharmacology and treatment Diagnosis Epidemiology Vector biology Vaccinology and prevention Demographic, ecological and social determinants Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信