Interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners and general medical practitioners: a qualitative study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Guangzhao Guan, Amanda Lim, HuiYee Sim, YeYan Khor, Li Mei
{"title":"Interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners and general medical practitioners: a qualitative study.","authors":"Guangzhao Guan, Amanda Lim, HuiYee Sim, YeYan Khor, Li Mei","doi":"10.1071/HC24071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Interprofessional communication between health care professionals is crucial to deliver quality health outcomes and enhance patients' quality of life. Aim This study aimed to investigate the perspectives and contents of the interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners (GDPs) and general medical practitioners (GPs), and to explore the barriers and strategies that could bridge the gap between these health care professionals from their perspectives. Methods A qualitative study approach was undertaken, with semi-structured interviews conducted with GDPs and GPs from Dunedin and Auckland, New Zealand. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach to identify patterns and main themes. Results Three major themes emerged from the interviews with GDPs (n =10) and GPs (n =6): (1) experiences of communication, (2) the content of communication and (3) barriers and suggestions to improve communication. Most GDP and GP participants reported that there was a lack of communication between these two specialties. Complex medical conditions and polypharmacy were the topics perceived as essential for interprofessional communication between GDPs and GPs. The barriers of communication included time constraints, insufficient knowledge of the dental field among most GPs, inadequate understanding of referral among GDPs, and the absence of a common means of communication. Discussion Both GDPs and GPs reported a lack of efficient interprofessional communication. They suggested implementing interprofessional education, integrating health record systems, scheduling regular face-to-face meetings, and developing effective referral guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Interprofessional communication between health care professionals is crucial to deliver quality health outcomes and enhance patients' quality of life. Aim This study aimed to investigate the perspectives and contents of the interprofessional communication between general dental practitioners (GDPs) and general medical practitioners (GPs), and to explore the barriers and strategies that could bridge the gap between these health care professionals from their perspectives. Methods A qualitative study approach was undertaken, with semi-structured interviews conducted with GDPs and GPs from Dunedin and Auckland, New Zealand. Transcripts were analysed using a thematic approach to identify patterns and main themes. Results Three major themes emerged from the interviews with GDPs (n =10) and GPs (n =6): (1) experiences of communication, (2) the content of communication and (3) barriers and suggestions to improve communication. Most GDP and GP participants reported that there was a lack of communication between these two specialties. Complex medical conditions and polypharmacy were the topics perceived as essential for interprofessional communication between GDPs and GPs. The barriers of communication included time constraints, insufficient knowledge of the dental field among most GPs, inadequate understanding of referral among GDPs, and the absence of a common means of communication. Discussion Both GDPs and GPs reported a lack of efficient interprofessional communication. They suggested implementing interprofessional education, integrating health record systems, scheduling regular face-to-face meetings, and developing effective referral guidelines.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信