Exploration of family/whānau and general practitioner perspectives of paediatric grommet services: a mixed methods study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Michelle A Pokorny, Elizabeth A-L Holt, Hannah Fuller, Peter R Thorne
{"title":"Exploration of family/whānau and general practitioner perspectives of paediatric grommet services: a mixed methods study.","authors":"Michelle A Pokorny, Elizabeth A-L Holt, Hannah Fuller, Peter R Thorne","doi":"10.1071/HC24083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Traditionally, grommet post-surgical follow-up care has been undertaken by otorhinolaryngologists (ORLs), but in a large public outpatient ORL service in Auckland, New Zealand (Counties Manukau), this responsibility has been partially devolved to general practitioners (GPs). Aim The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives and experiences of families/whānau and GPs regarding grommet services for children. Methods A mixed methods approach was used with family/whānau comprising semi-structured interviews and a GP survey. Recruitment of families/whānau reflected the local demographic and all participants were primary carers of a child who had received grommet surgery between 2020 and 2021. All GPs were practising in clinics within the ORL service catchment area. Results Twenty-eight family/whānau interviews were conducted, and 22 GPs responded to the survey. Five main themes were identified: (1) awareness of child development; (2) challenges accessing health care; (3) responses to health information; (4) importance of aftercare; and (5) preference for service provision. Most (16) GP respondents reported they should not be responsible for post-surgical follow-up after grommet insertion. Lack of capacity and funding were identified as key barriers to GP-led follow-up. Discussion Families/whānau highly valued follow-up services and hearing evaluations after grommet insertion, and had a strong preference for clinicians with perceived expertise in ear and hearing care (ORLs and audiologists). They reported multiple barriers to receiving the desired care. Māori and Pacific families/whānau experienced additional delays for referrals into specialist services. GPs showed low support for primary care-led grommet follow-up care, with most not providing routine grommet checks after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Traditionally, grommet post-surgical follow-up care has been undertaken by otorhinolaryngologists (ORLs), but in a large public outpatient ORL service in Auckland, New Zealand (Counties Manukau), this responsibility has been partially devolved to general practitioners (GPs). Aim The purpose of this study is to explore the perspectives and experiences of families/whānau and GPs regarding grommet services for children. Methods A mixed methods approach was used with family/whānau comprising semi-structured interviews and a GP survey. Recruitment of families/whānau reflected the local demographic and all participants were primary carers of a child who had received grommet surgery between 2020 and 2021. All GPs were practising in clinics within the ORL service catchment area. Results Twenty-eight family/whānau interviews were conducted, and 22 GPs responded to the survey. Five main themes were identified: (1) awareness of child development; (2) challenges accessing health care; (3) responses to health information; (4) importance of aftercare; and (5) preference for service provision. Most (16) GP respondents reported they should not be responsible for post-surgical follow-up after grommet insertion. Lack of capacity and funding were identified as key barriers to GP-led follow-up. Discussion Families/whānau highly valued follow-up services and hearing evaluations after grommet insertion, and had a strong preference for clinicians with perceived expertise in ear and hearing care (ORLs and audiologists). They reported multiple barriers to receiving the desired care. Māori and Pacific families/whānau experienced additional delays for referrals into specialist services. GPs showed low support for primary care-led grommet follow-up care, with most not providing routine grommet checks after surgery.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信