Expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty: a qualitative study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Tania Ghosh, Erik Blair
{"title":"Expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty: a qualitative study.","authors":"Tania Ghosh, Erik Blair","doi":"10.1071/HC24055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Clinical uncertainty is not uncommon; however, the current conception of the professional clinician has meant that discussion on uncertainty has focused on elimination rather than recognition. Uncertainty comes from an imbalance in knowledge, data, clinical experience, evidence-based guidelines, judgement, and decision-making. There is a strong argument for improving tolerance of clinical uncertainty, particularly in primary care where general practitioners might be especially vulnerable to uncertainty due to their exposure to undifferentiated illness. Aim This research aims to establish expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. Methods Two focus groups, consisting of three general practitioners and five expert patients, discussed uncertainty regarding restless legs syndrome. This topic was used as a rhetorical proxy to examine expert patient and general practitioner perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. The qualitative data were then analysed to form overarching thematic areas. Results Four overarching professional attributes were identified: collaboration, compassion, insight, and unconventional thinking. These are all attributes that lie within a clinician's skillset, but the evidence here suggests that they need to be foregrounded in practice. Discussion In attempting to assess professional clinical practice in relation to uncertainty, this research recommends that clinicians work to adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach, where they explicitly share uncertainties, focus on a patient's emotional state during the diagnostic phases of treatment, and see the merits of challenging themselves to look beyond routine algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"17 1","pages":"23-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Clinical uncertainty is not uncommon; however, the current conception of the professional clinician has meant that discussion on uncertainty has focused on elimination rather than recognition. Uncertainty comes from an imbalance in knowledge, data, clinical experience, evidence-based guidelines, judgement, and decision-making. There is a strong argument for improving tolerance of clinical uncertainty, particularly in primary care where general practitioners might be especially vulnerable to uncertainty due to their exposure to undifferentiated illness. Aim This research aims to establish expert patient and general practitioners' perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. Methods Two focus groups, consisting of three general practitioners and five expert patients, discussed uncertainty regarding restless legs syndrome. This topic was used as a rhetorical proxy to examine expert patient and general practitioner perspectives on the clinical attributes needed to deal with uncertainty. The qualitative data were then analysed to form overarching thematic areas. Results Four overarching professional attributes were identified: collaboration, compassion, insight, and unconventional thinking. These are all attributes that lie within a clinician's skillset, but the evidence here suggests that they need to be foregrounded in practice. Discussion In attempting to assess professional clinical practice in relation to uncertainty, this research recommends that clinicians work to adopt a holistic, patient-centred approach, where they explicitly share uncertainties, focus on a patient's emotional state during the diagnostic phases of treatment, and see the merits of challenging themselves to look beyond routine algorithms.

专家患者和全科医生对处理不确定性所需的临床属性的观点:一项定性研究。
临床不确定性并不罕见;然而,目前专业临床医生的概念意味着对不确定性的讨论侧重于消除而不是识别。不确定性来自知识、数据、临床经验、循证指南、判断和决策的不平衡。有一个强有力的论点是提高对临床不确定性的耐受性,特别是在初级保健中,全科医生可能特别容易受到不确定性的影响,因为他们暴露于未分化的疾病。目的本研究旨在建立专家患者和全科医生对处理不确定性所需的临床属性的观点。方法由3名全科医生和5名专家患者组成的两个焦点小组,讨论不宁腿综合征的不确定性。这个主题被用作修辞代理来检查专家患者和全科医生对处理不确定性所需的临床属性的观点。然后对定性数据进行分析,形成总体主题领域。结果确定了四个主要的职业属性:协作、同情、洞察力和非常规思维。这些都是临床医生的技能,但这里的证据表明,他们需要在实践中被重视。在试图评估与不确定性相关的专业临床实践时,本研究建议临床医生采取一种全面的、以患者为中心的方法,在这种方法中,他们明确地分享不确定性,在治疗的诊断阶段关注患者的情绪状态,并看到挑战自己超越常规算法的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信