Pharmacist-Initiated Team-Based Intervention for Optimizing Guideline-Directed Lipid Therapy of Hospitalized Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Pilot Study Using a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Design.

Q2 Medicine
JMIR Cardio Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.2196/58837
Gayle L Flo, Mateo Alzate Aguirre, Benjamin R Gochanour, Kristin J Hynes, Christopher G Scott, Angela L Fink, Adelaide M Arruda-Olson
{"title":"Pharmacist-Initiated Team-Based Intervention for Optimizing Guideline-Directed Lipid Therapy of Hospitalized Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Pilot Study Using a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Design.","authors":"Gayle L Flo, Mateo Alzate Aguirre, Benjamin R Gochanour, Kristin J Hynes, Christopher G Scott, Angela L Fink, Adelaide M Arruda-Olson","doi":"10.2196/58837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, high-intensity statins have been underused in this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a pharmacist-initiated, team-based intervention for the delivery of individualized, guideline-directed, lipid-lowering therapy for patients with ACS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients admitted with ACS to cardiology hospital services at Mayo Clinic from August 1, 2021, to June 19, 2022, were assigned to a pharmacist-initiated, team-based intervention group or control group using a stepped wedge cluster study design. For the intervention group, pharmacists reviewed electronic health records and provided recommendations for lipid lowering therapy in hospital and at follow-up. In the control group, patients received usual care. Neither care team, nor study team were blinded to study assignments. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ACS discharged on high-intensity statins in the intervention group compared to controls. Secondary outcomes were (1) proportion of patients in the intervention group with a specific templated pharmacist intervention note in their electronic health records, (2) frequency of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) measurements in hospital, (3) proportion of patients with information related to lipid follow-up in their discharge summary, and (4) proportion of patients that received LDL monitoring at the outpatient follow-up 4 to 12 weeks post discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 410 patients included in this study (median age 68, IQR 60-78 years) of whom 285 (69.5%) were male. Of the 402 patients alive at discharge, 355 (88.3%) were discharged taking a high-intensity statin, with no significant difference (P=.89) observed between groups. Lipid levels were measured in the hospital for 176/210 (83.8%) patients in the intervention group and 155/200 (77.5%) patients in the control group (P=.14). Fifty-four of 205 (26.3%) intervention patients alive at discharge had lipid-related recommendations in their discharge summary compared to 27/197 (13.7%) controls (P=.002). Forty-seven of 81 (58%) patients with lipid management recommendations provided in the discharge summary had LDL measured in the follow-up period compared with only 119/321 (37.1%) patients without these recommendations (P=.001). Of the 402 patients who survived to discharge, 166 (41.3%) had LDL measured at follow-up; the median LDL level was 63.5 (IQR 49-79) mg/dL, and distributions were similar by group (P=.95). Only 101/166 (60.8%) patients had follow-up LDL values below the target of 70 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During hospitalization, there was no group difference in the primary outcome of high-intensity statin therapy. Feasibility of an effective pharmacist-initiated intervention for improvement of lipid management was demonstrated by entry of recommendations in the discharge summary and related adjustment in outpatient statin therapy. The main opportunity for future improvement in lipid management of patients with ACS is in longitudinal patient follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":14706,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cardio","volume":"9 ","pages":"e58837"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cardio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/58837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, high-intensity statins have been underused in this population.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a pharmacist-initiated, team-based intervention for the delivery of individualized, guideline-directed, lipid-lowering therapy for patients with ACS.

Methods: Patients admitted with ACS to cardiology hospital services at Mayo Clinic from August 1, 2021, to June 19, 2022, were assigned to a pharmacist-initiated, team-based intervention group or control group using a stepped wedge cluster study design. For the intervention group, pharmacists reviewed electronic health records and provided recommendations for lipid lowering therapy in hospital and at follow-up. In the control group, patients received usual care. Neither care team, nor study team were blinded to study assignments. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with ACS discharged on high-intensity statins in the intervention group compared to controls. Secondary outcomes were (1) proportion of patients in the intervention group with a specific templated pharmacist intervention note in their electronic health records, (2) frequency of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) measurements in hospital, (3) proportion of patients with information related to lipid follow-up in their discharge summary, and (4) proportion of patients that received LDL monitoring at the outpatient follow-up 4 to 12 weeks post discharge.

Results: There were 410 patients included in this study (median age 68, IQR 60-78 years) of whom 285 (69.5%) were male. Of the 402 patients alive at discharge, 355 (88.3%) were discharged taking a high-intensity statin, with no significant difference (P=.89) observed between groups. Lipid levels were measured in the hospital for 176/210 (83.8%) patients in the intervention group and 155/200 (77.5%) patients in the control group (P=.14). Fifty-four of 205 (26.3%) intervention patients alive at discharge had lipid-related recommendations in their discharge summary compared to 27/197 (13.7%) controls (P=.002). Forty-seven of 81 (58%) patients with lipid management recommendations provided in the discharge summary had LDL measured in the follow-up period compared with only 119/321 (37.1%) patients without these recommendations (P=.001). Of the 402 patients who survived to discharge, 166 (41.3%) had LDL measured at follow-up; the median LDL level was 63.5 (IQR 49-79) mg/dL, and distributions were similar by group (P=.95). Only 101/166 (60.8%) patients had follow-up LDL values below the target of 70 mg/dL.

Conclusions: During hospitalization, there was no group difference in the primary outcome of high-intensity statin therapy. Feasibility of an effective pharmacist-initiated intervention for improvement of lipid management was demonstrated by entry of recommendations in the discharge summary and related adjustment in outpatient statin therapy. The main opportunity for future improvement in lipid management of patients with ACS is in longitudinal patient follow-up.

药师发起的基于团队的干预优化急性冠脉综合征住院患者的指导脂质治疗:采用楔形聚类设计的初步研究
背景:临床指南推荐急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者高强度他汀类药物治疗。然而,高强度的他汀类药物在这一人群中使用不足。目的:本研究的目的是评估药剂师发起的、基于团队的干预,为ACS患者提供个体化、指南导向的降脂治疗的可行性。方法:从2021年8月1日至2022年6月19日,在梅奥诊所心脏病医院服务的ACS患者被分配到一个药剂师发起的,基于团队的干预组或对照组,采用楔形聚类研究设计。对于干预组,药剂师审查电子健康记录,并在医院和随访中提供降脂治疗建议。对照组患者接受常规护理。护理小组和研究小组都没有被蒙蔽。主要结局是与对照组相比,干预组ACS患者使用高强度他汀类药物出院的比例。次要结局为(1)干预组患者在电子健康记录中有特定模板药剂师干预记录的比例,(2)医院低密度脂蛋白(LDL)测量频率,(3)出院总结中有脂质随访相关信息的患者比例,(4)出院后4至12周门诊随访中接受LDL监测的患者比例。结果:本研究纳入410例患者,中位年龄68岁,年龄60 ~ 78岁,其中285例(69.5%)为男性。在402例出院时存活的患者中,355例(88.3%)患者出院时服用了高强度他汀类药物,两组间差异无统计学意义(P= 0.89)。干预组176/210例(83.8%)患者和对照组155/200例(77.5%)患者在医院检测血脂水平(P=.14)。205例出院时存活的干预患者中有54例(26.3%)在出院总结中有与血脂相关的建议,而对照组中有27例(13.7%)(P= 0.002)。出院总结中提出血脂管理建议的81例患者中有47例(58%)在随访期间测量了LDL,而没有这些建议的患者中只有119例(37.1%)测量了LDL (P= 0.001)。在402例存活至出院的患者中,166例(41.3%)在随访时测量了LDL;低密度脂蛋白水平中位数为63.5 (IQR 49 ~ 79) mg/dL,各组分布相似(P= 0.95)。只有101/166(60.8%)患者的随访LDL值低于70 mg/dL的目标。结论:住院期间,高强度他汀类药物治疗的主要转归无组间差异。通过出院总结中的建议和门诊他汀类药物治疗的相关调整,证明了药剂师发起的有效干预改善血脂管理的可行性。未来改善ACS患者血脂管理的主要机会是对患者进行纵向随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cardio
JMIR Cardio Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信