Causal relationship between 731 immune cell immunophenotypes and giant cell arteritis: a Mendelian randomisation study.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Qiong Liu, Xiaofang Liu, Mengge Gao, Bo Yang, Miaoqing Luo, Biying Yang, Guojun Liang
{"title":"Causal relationship between 731 immune cell immunophenotypes and giant cell arteritis: a Mendelian randomisation study.","authors":"Qiong Liu, Xiaofang Liu, Mengge Gao, Bo Yang, Miaoqing Luo, Biying Yang, Guojun Liang","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/bnjlz9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of vasculitis among adults aged 50 and over, characterised by systemic inflammation and the potential for severe complications such as blindness and stroke. Despite its prevalence, the aetiology of GCA remains incompletely understood, with current treatments largely relying on corticosteroids, which carry significant side effects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study utilised a bilateral Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach to investigate the causal impact of immune cells on GCA. By analysing 731 immune cell phenotypes from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data of 3,757 European individuals, we aimed to identify genetic variants as instrumental variables for immune cell traits, thereby elucidating their role in GCA susceptibility. To ensure a robust examination, we used various MR techniques, including the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, and carried out sensitivity analyses to assess the dependability of our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forward MR analysis identified three immune traits with significant associations with GCA: a protective effect from the absolute count of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and increased risks associated with HLA DR expression on CD14+ CD16-, and CD14+ monocytes. The sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with the main findings. The reverse MR analysis yielded no statistically significant results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study advances our understanding of the immunological underpinnings of GCA, suggesting that specific immune cells significantly influence the disease's development. These insights pave the way for the exploration of new therapeutic targets that could offer more targeted and tolerable treatment options beyond the current reliance on corticosteroids. Further research is needed to validate these potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"621-629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/bnjlz9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of vasculitis among adults aged 50 and over, characterised by systemic inflammation and the potential for severe complications such as blindness and stroke. Despite its prevalence, the aetiology of GCA remains incompletely understood, with current treatments largely relying on corticosteroids, which carry significant side effects.

Methods: Our study utilised a bilateral Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach to investigate the causal impact of immune cells on GCA. By analysing 731 immune cell phenotypes from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data of 3,757 European individuals, we aimed to identify genetic variants as instrumental variables for immune cell traits, thereby elucidating their role in GCA susceptibility. To ensure a robust examination, we used various MR techniques, including the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, and carried out sensitivity analyses to assess the dependability of our findings.

Results: Forward MR analysis identified three immune traits with significant associations with GCA: a protective effect from the absolute count of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells and increased risks associated with HLA DR expression on CD14+ CD16-, and CD14+ monocytes. The sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with the main findings. The reverse MR analysis yielded no statistically significant results.

Conclusions: The study advances our understanding of the immunological underpinnings of GCA, suggesting that specific immune cells significantly influence the disease's development. These insights pave the way for the exploration of new therapeutic targets that could offer more targeted and tolerable treatment options beyond the current reliance on corticosteroids. Further research is needed to validate these potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in clinical settings.

研究目的巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)是 50 岁及以上成年人中最常见的血管炎,以全身性炎症为特征,有可能引发失明和中风等严重并发症。尽管GCA的发病率很高,但其病因仍不完全清楚,目前的治疗主要依赖于皮质类固醇,而皮质类固醇有很大的副作用:方法:我们的研究采用双侧孟德尔随机化(MR)方法研究免疫细胞对 GCA 的因果影响。通过分析 3,757 名欧洲人的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据中的 731 种免疫细胞表型,我们旨在确定作为免疫细胞性状工具变量的遗传变异,从而阐明它们在 GCA 易感性中的作用。为确保研究的稳健性,我们使用了包括逆方差加权法(IVW)在内的各种磁共振技术,并进行了敏感性分析以评估研究结果的可靠性:前向磁共振分析发现了三种与 GCA 有显著关联的免疫特征:单核细胞髓源性抑制细胞绝对数量的保护作用以及 CD14+ CD16- 和 CD14+ 单核细胞上 HLA DR 表达相关的风险增加。敏感性分析的结果与主要发现一致。反向 MR 分析没有得出具有统计学意义的结果:这项研究加深了我们对 GCA 免疫学基础的理解,表明特定的免疫细胞对该疾病的发展有重大影响。这些见解为探索新的治疗靶点铺平了道路,除了目前依赖皮质类固醇外,这些靶点还能提供更有针对性、更可耐受的治疗方案。在临床环境中验证这些潜在的生物标记物和治疗靶点还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信