Agroecological and technological practices in European arable farming: Past uptake and expert visions for future development

IF 6 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Yafei Li , Julian Helfenstein , Rebecca Swart , Christian Levers , Franziska Mohr , Vasco Diogo , Matthias Bürgi , Tim G. Williams , Rigas Zafeiriou , Anita Zarina , Jeanine Ammann , Víctor Rolo , Peter H. Verburg , Michael Beckmann , Józef Hernik , Thanasis Kizos , Felix Herzog
{"title":"Agroecological and technological practices in European arable farming: Past uptake and expert visions for future development","authors":"Yafei Li ,&nbsp;Julian Helfenstein ,&nbsp;Rebecca Swart ,&nbsp;Christian Levers ,&nbsp;Franziska Mohr ,&nbsp;Vasco Diogo ,&nbsp;Matthias Bürgi ,&nbsp;Tim G. Williams ,&nbsp;Rigas Zafeiriou ,&nbsp;Anita Zarina ,&nbsp;Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Víctor Rolo ,&nbsp;Peter H. Verburg ,&nbsp;Michael Beckmann ,&nbsp;Józef Hernik ,&nbsp;Thanasis Kizos ,&nbsp;Felix Herzog","doi":"10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agroecological and technological innovations are two important approaches in the transition towards agricultural sustainability. We lack knowledge about how current agricultural contexts may influence future development pathways and the relative importance of the two approaches. This study explores the alignment between past uptake of agroecological and technological practices and future visions of agricultural development in seven European arable farming systems. By combining landscape mapping with farmer interviews, we first assessed the past adoption of agroecological and technological practices in each region. Then, we compared our findings with expert surveys about the future directions of agricultural development that can address local arable farming challenges. We found that in regions with intensive arable farming, agroecological approaches lagged behind the uptake of technological measures, both in the past and in future prospects. In low-intensity regions, we found large gaps between past uptake and future prospects of agroecological and technological practice adoption. These gaps need to be overcome in the context of future challenges of climate change adaptation and of environmental obligations. Our results indicate the need to take differentiated measures depending on farm management intensity and landscape conditions to enhance the future uptake of agroecological and technological solutions that can address the local challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17933,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Policy","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 107553"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725000870","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroecological and technological innovations are two important approaches in the transition towards agricultural sustainability. We lack knowledge about how current agricultural contexts may influence future development pathways and the relative importance of the two approaches. This study explores the alignment between past uptake of agroecological and technological practices and future visions of agricultural development in seven European arable farming systems. By combining landscape mapping with farmer interviews, we first assessed the past adoption of agroecological and technological practices in each region. Then, we compared our findings with expert surveys about the future directions of agricultural development that can address local arable farming challenges. We found that in regions with intensive arable farming, agroecological approaches lagged behind the uptake of technological measures, both in the past and in future prospects. In low-intensity regions, we found large gaps between past uptake and future prospects of agroecological and technological practice adoption. These gaps need to be overcome in the context of future challenges of climate change adaptation and of environmental obligations. Our results indicate the need to take differentiated measures depending on farm management intensity and landscape conditions to enhance the future uptake of agroecological and technological solutions that can address the local challenges.
欧洲耕地农业的生态农业和技术实践:过去的吸收和专家对未来发展的展望
农业生态和技术创新是向农业可持续性转型的两个重要途径。我们对当前的农业环境如何影响未来的发展路径以及这两种方法的相对重要性缺乏了解。本研究探讨了七个欧洲可耕地农业系统中过去对农业生态和技术实践的吸收与未来农业发展愿景之间的一致性。通过将景观测绘与农民访谈相结合,我们首先评估了每个地区过去采用的农业生态和技术实践。然后,我们将我们的发现与专家关于未来农业发展方向的调查结果进行了比较,这些方向可以解决当地可耕地农业的挑战。我们发现,在精耕细作地区,无论是过去还是未来,农业生态方法都落后于技术措施的采用。在低强度地区,我们发现农业生态和技术实践采用的过去吸收与未来前景之间存在很大差距。这些差距需要在适应气候变化的未来挑战和环境义务的背景下加以克服。我们的研究结果表明,需要根据农场管理强度和景观条件采取差异化措施,以加强未来对农业生态和技术解决方案的吸收,以应对当地的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
553
期刊介绍: Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. Land Use Policy examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信