Long-term breast sensation following breast augmentation: A retrospective analysis of influencing factors

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Galip Gencay Üstün , Berkay Sert , Zeynep Nesil Demirli , Osman Dağ , Hakan Uzun , Figen Özgür
{"title":"Long-term breast sensation following breast augmentation: A retrospective analysis of influencing factors","authors":"Galip Gencay Üstün ,&nbsp;Berkay Sert ,&nbsp;Zeynep Nesil Demirli ,&nbsp;Osman Dağ ,&nbsp;Hakan Uzun ,&nbsp;Figen Özgür","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.03.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Breast augmentation is associated with high patient satisfaction; however, preserving breast sensation remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate long-term breast sensation and identify factors affecting sensation following breast augmentation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included breast augmentation patients (experimental group) and an unoperated control group to evaluate the sensory changes following surgery. Sensory assessments were conducted using the Semmes–Weinstein monofilament test at 9 specific points on each breast, measuring central, peripheral and total sensory values. Comparisons of the sensory outcomes were made between the experimental and control groups, as well as within the experimental group. Factors such as smoking, systemic diseases, pregnancy, breastfeeding, implant plane, implant size and type and complications were analysed for their impact on sensation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 55 breast augmentation patients (110 breasts) and 20 controls (40 breasts). Sensory outcomes were significantly better in controls than in the operated group. Smoking, systemic diseases, implant size and type showed no significant impact on sensation. Pregnancy and breastfeeding were associated with better central sensation, whereas peripheral sensation was unaffected. Subglandular placement preserved central sensation better than dual-plane 2 and 3 placements but significantly reduced peripheral sensation. Post-operative complications were linked to decreased central sensation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Breast augmentation is associated with decreased sensation compared to controls. Subglandular placement preserves central sensation better than dual-plane placement. Smoking, systemic diseases and implant size and type were not significantly related to sensory outcomes, while post-operative surgical complications were associated with diminished central sensation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525002104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breast augmentation is associated with high patient satisfaction; however, preserving breast sensation remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate long-term breast sensation and identify factors affecting sensation following breast augmentation.

Methods

This retrospective study included breast augmentation patients (experimental group) and an unoperated control group to evaluate the sensory changes following surgery. Sensory assessments were conducted using the Semmes–Weinstein monofilament test at 9 specific points on each breast, measuring central, peripheral and total sensory values. Comparisons of the sensory outcomes were made between the experimental and control groups, as well as within the experimental group. Factors such as smoking, systemic diseases, pregnancy, breastfeeding, implant plane, implant size and type and complications were analysed for their impact on sensation.

Results

The study included 55 breast augmentation patients (110 breasts) and 20 controls (40 breasts). Sensory outcomes were significantly better in controls than in the operated group. Smoking, systemic diseases, implant size and type showed no significant impact on sensation. Pregnancy and breastfeeding were associated with better central sensation, whereas peripheral sensation was unaffected. Subglandular placement preserved central sensation better than dual-plane 2 and 3 placements but significantly reduced peripheral sensation. Post-operative complications were linked to decreased central sensation.

Conclusions

Breast augmentation is associated with decreased sensation compared to controls. Subglandular placement preserves central sensation better than dual-plane placement. Smoking, systemic diseases and implant size and type were not significantly related to sensory outcomes, while post-operative surgical complications were associated with diminished central sensation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信