Natural language processing for identifying major bleeding risk in hospitalised medical patients

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Anne Bryde Alnor , Rasmus Bank Lynggaard , Martin Sundahl Laursen , Pernille Just Vinholt
{"title":"Natural language processing for identifying major bleeding risk in hospitalised medical patients","authors":"Anne Bryde Alnor ,&nbsp;Rasmus Bank Lynggaard ,&nbsp;Martin Sundahl Laursen ,&nbsp;Pernille Just Vinholt","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Major bleeding is a severe complication in critically ill medical patients, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This study aims to assess the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding in hospitalised medical patients using a Natural Language Processing (NLP) model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study using electronic health records of adult patients admitted through the Emergency Department at Odense University Hospital from January 2017 to December 2022. Major bleeding during admission was identified and validated using a natural language model, with events classified according to current guidelines. Risk factors, including demographics, comorbidities, and biochemical values at admission, were evaluated. Two risk assessment models (RAMs) were developed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Validation included, bootstrapping, K-fold cross validation, and cluster analyses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 46,439 eligible patients, 1246 (2.7 %) experienced major bleeding. Risk factors for major bleeding included older age, male sex, alcohol consumption, higher systolic blood pressure, lower haemoglobin, and higher creatinine. RAM 1, which included biochemical data and comorbidities, demonstrated robust predictive performance (Harrell's C-statistic = 0.726). RAM 2, a simplified model without comorbidities, maintained similar predictive accuracy (C-statistic = 0.721), indicating its potential utility in clinical settings with limited resources for detailed patient histories. Results were consistent throughout validation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the incidence and risk factors of major bleeding in medical patients, emphasizing the predictive value of routinely measured biochemical markers. Furthermore, it shows the applicability of NLP models in identifying bleeding episodes in EHR text.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 110093"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482525004445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Major bleeding is a severe complication in critically ill medical patients, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. This study aims to assess the incidence and risk factors for major bleeding in hospitalised medical patients using a Natural Language Processing (NLP) model.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional observational study using electronic health records of adult patients admitted through the Emergency Department at Odense University Hospital from January 2017 to December 2022. Major bleeding during admission was identified and validated using a natural language model, with events classified according to current guidelines. Risk factors, including demographics, comorbidities, and biochemical values at admission, were evaluated. Two risk assessment models (RAMs) were developed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Validation included, bootstrapping, K-fold cross validation, and cluster analyses.

Results

Of the 46,439 eligible patients, 1246 (2.7 %) experienced major bleeding. Risk factors for major bleeding included older age, male sex, alcohol consumption, higher systolic blood pressure, lower haemoglobin, and higher creatinine. RAM 1, which included biochemical data and comorbidities, demonstrated robust predictive performance (Harrell's C-statistic = 0.726). RAM 2, a simplified model without comorbidities, maintained similar predictive accuracy (C-statistic = 0.721), indicating its potential utility in clinical settings with limited resources for detailed patient histories. Results were consistent throughout validation.

Conclusion

This study highlights the incidence and risk factors of major bleeding in medical patients, emphasizing the predictive value of routinely measured biochemical markers. Furthermore, it shows the applicability of NLP models in identifying bleeding episodes in EHR text.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信