Criteria to Report Adverse Drug Withdrawal Events in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.

Jimin J Lee, Émilie Bortolussi-Courval, Eva Filosa, Soham Rej, Claire Godard-Sebillote, Robyn Tamblyn, Todd C Lee, Emily G McDonald
{"title":"Criteria to Report Adverse Drug Withdrawal Events in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jimin J Lee, Émilie Bortolussi-Courval, Eva Filosa, Soham Rej, Claire Godard-Sebillote, Robyn Tamblyn, Todd C Lee, Emily G McDonald","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polypharmacy is a major risk factor for adverse drug events (ADEs), which are a common cause of hospitalization, especially among older adults. Deprescribing is a promising strategy to prevent ADEs; however, clinicians may hesitate to deprescribe for fear of causing adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs). Collectively, ADWEs are the re-emergence of symptoms or a disease state due to the discontinuation of a medication. Although capturing ADWEs is critical to understanding the complications that might arise from deprescribing, these events may not be routinely or systematically captured in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to determine the frequency of ADWE reporting, compare the strengths and limitations of different approaches, and compare the rates of the number of ADWEs detected across trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The search strategy was developed with a research librarian, and studies were identified using Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials testing a deprescribing intervention in older adults (mean or median age ≥ 65 years) and analyzed a subsample of the studies reporting ADWEs as an outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 139 eligible studies that were identified, only 12 reported an ADWE. These studies utilized 6 approaches to capture ADWEs: Naranjo ADWE Probability Scale; clinical monitoring for specific withdrawal symptoms; identification through ICD-10 codes; identification of ADWEs as a subset of confirmed ADEs; patient/caregiver self-report; and clinical judgment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results confirmed that few deprescribing studies capture ADWEs and there is a lack of standardized reporting. A harmonized approach to capturing ADWEs with specific criteria could ensure more consistent results in deprescribing trials, improve our understanding of this important outcome, and facilitate future meta-analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polypharmacy is a major risk factor for adverse drug events (ADEs), which are a common cause of hospitalization, especially among older adults. Deprescribing is a promising strategy to prevent ADEs; however, clinicians may hesitate to deprescribe for fear of causing adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs). Collectively, ADWEs are the re-emergence of symptoms or a disease state due to the discontinuation of a medication. Although capturing ADWEs is critical to understanding the complications that might arise from deprescribing, these events may not be routinely or systematically captured in clinical trials.

Objectives: We aimed to determine the frequency of ADWE reporting, compare the strengths and limitations of different approaches, and compare the rates of the number of ADWEs detected across trials.

Methods: A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. The search strategy was developed with a research librarian, and studies were identified using Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials testing a deprescribing intervention in older adults (mean or median age ≥ 65 years) and analyzed a subsample of the studies reporting ADWEs as an outcome.

Results: Among the 139 eligible studies that were identified, only 12 reported an ADWE. These studies utilized 6 approaches to capture ADWEs: Naranjo ADWE Probability Scale; clinical monitoring for specific withdrawal symptoms; identification through ICD-10 codes; identification of ADWEs as a subset of confirmed ADEs; patient/caregiver self-report; and clinical judgment.

Conclusion: Results confirmed that few deprescribing studies capture ADWEs and there is a lack of standardized reporting. A harmonized approach to capturing ADWEs with specific criteria could ensure more consistent results in deprescribing trials, improve our understanding of this important outcome, and facilitate future meta-analyses.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信