Discrepancy in vessel tortuosity measurements of anterior circulation cerebral artery between digital subtraction angiography and magnetic resonance angiography.

Jae Ho Kim, Hyeondong Yang, Nak-Hoon Son, Chang Ki Jang, Jae Whan Lee, Kwang-Chun Cho
{"title":"Discrepancy in vessel tortuosity measurements of anterior circulation cerebral artery between digital subtraction angiography and magnetic resonance angiography.","authors":"Jae Ho Kim, Hyeondong Yang, Nak-Hoon Son, Chang Ki Jang, Jae Whan Lee, Kwang-Chun Cho","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2025.E2024.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Tortuosity in blood vessels is a common angiographic feature that plays a crucial role in hemodynamics and is implicated in systemic diseases such as arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Although studies exist on the relationship between vessel tortuosity and intracranial aneurysms, standard imaging modalities and parameters representing vessel tortuosity are controversial. This study compared vessel tortuosity based on angle measurements using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 85 patients with 63 males (75.3%) with unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms between December 2021 and December 2022 was conducted using MRA and DSA. The vessel angles of several segments in the carotid siphon, internal carotid artery bifurcation, and the inflow angles to intracranial aneurysms were measured to evaluate the discrepancy between MRA and DSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in vessel and inflow angles between MRA and DSA, except the internal carotid artery-middle cerebral artery (ICA-MCA) angle, which shows a significant difference (MRA; 50.26˚ (interquartile range (IQR), 33.49-70.57), DSA; 50.75˚ (IQR, 34.91-62.24), p-value=0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a discrepancy between MRA and DSA in measuring the ICA-MCA angle. Further studies are required to address observed discrepancies between imaging modalities and improve the accuracy of hemodynamic analysis in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2025.E2024.11.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Tortuosity in blood vessels is a common angiographic feature that plays a crucial role in hemodynamics and is implicated in systemic diseases such as arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Although studies exist on the relationship between vessel tortuosity and intracranial aneurysms, standard imaging modalities and parameters representing vessel tortuosity are controversial. This study compared vessel tortuosity based on angle measurements using magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 85 patients with 63 males (75.3%) with unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms between December 2021 and December 2022 was conducted using MRA and DSA. The vessel angles of several segments in the carotid siphon, internal carotid artery bifurcation, and the inflow angles to intracranial aneurysms were measured to evaluate the discrepancy between MRA and DSA.

Results: No significant difference was observed in vessel and inflow angles between MRA and DSA, except the internal carotid artery-middle cerebral artery (ICA-MCA) angle, which shows a significant difference (MRA; 50.26˚ (interquartile range (IQR), 33.49-70.57), DSA; 50.75˚ (IQR, 34.91-62.24), p-value=0.035).

Conclusions: We found a discrepancy between MRA and DSA in measuring the ICA-MCA angle. Further studies are required to address observed discrepancies between imaging modalities and improve the accuracy of hemodynamic analysis in clinical settings.

数字减影血管造影术和磁共振血管造影术对前循环大脑动脉血管迂曲度测量的差异。
目的:血管迂曲是一种常见的血管造影特征,在血液动力学中起着至关重要的作用,并与动脉高血压和糖尿病等全身性疾病有关。虽然已有关于血管迂曲与颅内动脉瘤之间关系的研究,但代表血管迂曲的标准成像模式和参数仍存在争议。本研究比较了基于磁共振血管造影(MRA)和数字减影血管造影(DSA)角度测量的血管迂曲度:方法:采用 MRA 和 DSA 对 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月间 85 例未破裂前循环动脉瘤患者进行回顾性分析,其中 63 例为男性(75.3%)。测量了颈动脉虹吸管、颈内动脉分叉处多个节段的血管角度以及颅内动脉瘤的流入角,以评估 MRA 和 DSA 之间的差异:除了颈内动脉-大脑中动脉(ICA-MCA)角度有明显差异外(MRA;50.26˚(四分位距(IQR),33.49-70.57),DSA;50.75˚(IQR,34.91-62.24),P值=0.035),MRA和DSA在血管角度和动脉流入角度方面没有观察到明显差异:我们发现 MRA 和 DSA 在测量 ICA-MCA 角度时存在差异。结论:我们发现 MRA 和 DSA 在测量 ICA-MCA 角度时存在差异,需要进一步研究来解决成像模式之间的差异,并提高临床血液动力学分析的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信