Health information management professionals' investigator involvement in research: barriers and facilitators.

Joan Henderson, Merilyn Riley, Benjamin Brown, Mary Lam, Stephanie Gjorgioski, Melanie Tassos, Jenny Davis, Kerin Robinson
{"title":"Health information management professionals' investigator involvement in research: barriers and facilitators.","authors":"Joan Henderson, Merilyn Riley, Benjamin Brown, Mary Lam, Stephanie Gjorgioski, Melanie Tassos, Jenny Davis, Kerin Robinson","doi":"10.1177/18333583251322985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research underpins and informs a profession's growth. Research and practice have a fundamental relationship involving knowledge production and its applications to a profession's work.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate health information management professionals': interest in investigator involvement in research; exposure to, or opportunity for, research investigator involvement; areas of research interest; barriers to research investigator involvement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was utilised. An online survey elicited data on respondents': demographics, employment, roles; access to research information; interest and experience in research engagement; experience of barriers to research investigator involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 112 respondents: 64.3% reported no research involvement; 35.7% had research team experience; 83.9% retrieved research information from the web; 73.9% had no role-based research component; 51.3% had been approached by other (workplace-based) researchers to access and analyse data. Barriers to investigator involvement were personal, organisational and logistical, with lack of time the greatest impediment (62.5%) followed by cost (33.9%), lack of confidence (33%) and not knowing who to approach, or how (31.3%). Research skill development was important for 14.1%. Clinical Coding and Classification Systems (13.3%) and eHealth (12.6%) were considered likely to benefit most from health information management-related research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health information management practitioners generally have interest in research engagement; barriers include time, money and confidence.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Provision of research skills and the anomaly of requests for facilitation of data access and analyses alongside absence of a research component in their formal roles require attention. The professional association should actively encourage collaborative academic-practitioner research and showcase new evidence for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583251322985"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583251322985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research underpins and informs a profession's growth. Research and practice have a fundamental relationship involving knowledge production and its applications to a profession's work.

Objectives: To investigate health information management professionals': interest in investigator involvement in research; exposure to, or opportunity for, research investigator involvement; areas of research interest; barriers to research investigator involvement.

Method: A cross-sectional study design was utilised. An online survey elicited data on respondents': demographics, employment, roles; access to research information; interest and experience in research engagement; experience of barriers to research investigator involvement.

Results: Of 112 respondents: 64.3% reported no research involvement; 35.7% had research team experience; 83.9% retrieved research information from the web; 73.9% had no role-based research component; 51.3% had been approached by other (workplace-based) researchers to access and analyse data. Barriers to investigator involvement were personal, organisational and logistical, with lack of time the greatest impediment (62.5%) followed by cost (33.9%), lack of confidence (33%) and not knowing who to approach, or how (31.3%). Research skill development was important for 14.1%. Clinical Coding and Classification Systems (13.3%) and eHealth (12.6%) were considered likely to benefit most from health information management-related research.

Conclusion: Health information management practitioners generally have interest in research engagement; barriers include time, money and confidence.

Implications for practice: Provision of research skills and the anomaly of requests for facilitation of data access and analyses alongside absence of a research component in their formal roles require attention. The professional association should actively encourage collaborative academic-practitioner research and showcase new evidence for practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信