Joan Henderson, Merilyn Riley, Benjamin Brown, Mary Lam, Stephanie Gjorgioski, Melanie Tassos, Jenny Davis, Kerin Robinson
{"title":"Health information management professionals' investigator involvement in research: barriers and facilitators.","authors":"Joan Henderson, Merilyn Riley, Benjamin Brown, Mary Lam, Stephanie Gjorgioski, Melanie Tassos, Jenny Davis, Kerin Robinson","doi":"10.1177/18333583251322985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research underpins and informs a profession's growth. Research and practice have a fundamental relationship involving knowledge production and its applications to a profession's work.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate health information management professionals': interest in investigator involvement in research; exposure to, or opportunity for, research investigator involvement; areas of research interest; barriers to research investigator involvement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study design was utilised. An online survey elicited data on respondents': demographics, employment, roles; access to research information; interest and experience in research engagement; experience of barriers to research investigator involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 112 respondents: 64.3% reported no research involvement; 35.7% had research team experience; 83.9% retrieved research information from the web; 73.9% had no role-based research component; 51.3% had been approached by other (workplace-based) researchers to access and analyse data. Barriers to investigator involvement were personal, organisational and logistical, with lack of time the greatest impediment (62.5%) followed by cost (33.9%), lack of confidence (33%) and not knowing who to approach, or how (31.3%). Research skill development was important for 14.1%. Clinical Coding and Classification Systems (13.3%) and eHealth (12.6%) were considered likely to benefit most from health information management-related research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health information management practitioners generally have interest in research engagement; barriers include time, money and confidence.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Provision of research skills and the anomaly of requests for facilitation of data access and analyses alongside absence of a research component in their formal roles require attention. The professional association should actively encourage collaborative academic-practitioner research and showcase new evidence for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583251322985"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583251322985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Research underpins and informs a profession's growth. Research and practice have a fundamental relationship involving knowledge production and its applications to a profession's work.
Objectives: To investigate health information management professionals': interest in investigator involvement in research; exposure to, or opportunity for, research investigator involvement; areas of research interest; barriers to research investigator involvement.
Method: A cross-sectional study design was utilised. An online survey elicited data on respondents': demographics, employment, roles; access to research information; interest and experience in research engagement; experience of barriers to research investigator involvement.
Results: Of 112 respondents: 64.3% reported no research involvement; 35.7% had research team experience; 83.9% retrieved research information from the web; 73.9% had no role-based research component; 51.3% had been approached by other (workplace-based) researchers to access and analyse data. Barriers to investigator involvement were personal, organisational and logistical, with lack of time the greatest impediment (62.5%) followed by cost (33.9%), lack of confidence (33%) and not knowing who to approach, or how (31.3%). Research skill development was important for 14.1%. Clinical Coding and Classification Systems (13.3%) and eHealth (12.6%) were considered likely to benefit most from health information management-related research.
Conclusion: Health information management practitioners generally have interest in research engagement; barriers include time, money and confidence.
Implications for practice: Provision of research skills and the anomaly of requests for facilitation of data access and analyses alongside absence of a research component in their formal roles require attention. The professional association should actively encourage collaborative academic-practitioner research and showcase new evidence for practice.