Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Sepsis Survivors Following Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001238
Sheraya De Silva, Anna Urwin, Chantal Grimwood, Ethan K E Goh, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson
{"title":"Health-Related Quality of Life of Adult Sepsis Survivors Following Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sheraya De Silva, Anna Urwin, Chantal Grimwood, Ethan K E Goh, Alisa M Higgins, Carol L Hodgson","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As survival following sepsis improves, there is increased attention on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of survivors following critical illness. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on the HRQoL of adult sepsis survivors following critical illness.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>OVID MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched using a combination of MeSH subject headings and keywords.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>English-language studies published between January 2009 and June 2024, which investigated the HRQoL of adult sepsis survivors at 90 days or more following critical illness.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Extracted data from included studies comprised HRQoL findings, the instruments administered, and representation of adult survivors following critical illness. Risk-of-bias quality assessment was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies - of Exposure tool. Selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Thrity-three eligible studies were yielded from 25,611 records, with the sample size among included studies ranging from 55 to 2,151 participants. Included studies were mostly conducted in Europe. The EuroQol 5-dimension three-level instrument was most commonly administered (19 [58%] studies). Our review found that adult sepsis survivors following critical illness have lower HRQoL than population norms, regardless of follow-up timepoint. No significant difference was found in the HRQoL of adult survivors following critical illness with or without sepsis. High risk of bias in included studies was mostly due to missing data and confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As survival following critical illness improves, future research on improving long-term HRQoL following sepsis is crucial.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 4","pages":"e1238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11949298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: As survival following sepsis improves, there is increased attention on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of survivors following critical illness. The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature on the HRQoL of adult sepsis survivors following critical illness.

Data sources: OVID MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL were searched using a combination of MeSH subject headings and keywords.

Study selection: English-language studies published between January 2009 and June 2024, which investigated the HRQoL of adult sepsis survivors at 90 days or more following critical illness.

Data extraction: Extracted data from included studies comprised HRQoL findings, the instruments administered, and representation of adult survivors following critical illness. Risk-of-bias quality assessment was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies - of Exposure tool. Selection of studies, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers.

Data synthesis: Thrity-three eligible studies were yielded from 25,611 records, with the sample size among included studies ranging from 55 to 2,151 participants. Included studies were mostly conducted in Europe. The EuroQol 5-dimension three-level instrument was most commonly administered (19 [58%] studies). Our review found that adult sepsis survivors following critical illness have lower HRQoL than population norms, regardless of follow-up timepoint. No significant difference was found in the HRQoL of adult survivors following critical illness with or without sepsis. High risk of bias in included studies was mostly due to missing data and confounding.

Conclusions: As survival following critical illness improves, future research on improving long-term HRQoL following sepsis is crucial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

成人败血症幸存者危重病后与健康相关的生活质量:系统回顾
目的:随着脓毒症后生存率的提高,人们越来越关注危重疾病后幸存者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。本研究的目的是系统地回顾有关成人脓毒症危重症幸存者HRQoL的文献。数据来源:OVID MEDLINE, Embase和CINAHL使用MeSH主题标题和关键词的组合进行搜索。研究选择:2009年1月至2024年6月间发表的英语研究,这些研究调查了危重疾病后90天或更长时间的成人败血症幸存者的HRQoL。数据提取:从纳入的研究中提取的数据包括HRQoL结果、使用的工具和危重疾病后成年幸存者的代表。使用Cochrane非随机研究的偏倚风险-暴露工具评估偏倚风险质量。研究选择、数据提取和质量评估均由两位审稿人独立进行。数据综合:从25,611条记录中获得了30 - 3项符合条件的研究,纳入研究的样本量从55到2,151名参与者不等。纳入的研究大多在欧洲进行。EuroQol 5维三级仪器是最常用的方法(19项[58%]研究)。我们的回顾发现,危重疾病后的成年脓毒症幸存者的HRQoL低于人群标准,无论随访时间点如何。危重症成年幸存者伴或不伴败血症的HRQoL无显著差异。纳入研究的高偏倚风险主要是由于缺少数据和混淆。结论:随着危重疾病后生存率的提高,进一步研究脓毒症后长期HRQoL的改善至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信