A national evaluation of the implementation of guideline recommendations towards antibiotic prophylaxis prior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube placement.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.26402/jpp.2025.1.06
H Albrecht, H J Herrmann, P Jaensch, J Zerth, J Siebler, M F Neurath, P C Konturek, Y Zopf
{"title":"A national evaluation of the implementation of guideline recommendations towards antibiotic prophylaxis prior to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube placement.","authors":"H Albrecht, H J Herrmann, P Jaensch, J Zerth, J Siebler, M F Neurath, P C Konturek, Y Zopf","doi":"10.26402/jpp.2025.1.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) tube placement are standard procedures for artificially administered nutrition support in malnourished patients. However, minor and major complications can occur. Peristomal infections are most common, potentially leading to severe inflammation, hospitalization, and PEG/PEJ removal. Antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing peristomal infections and recommended by current guidelines but does not seem to be systematically used. The present study evaluated the implementation of prophylactic antibiosis in PEG/PEJ placement in clinical routine in Germany. A web-based survey was conducted among hospitals, ambulatory health care centers, and focus practice. In total, 107 participants have finalized the questionnaire. Most participants were from major regional and maximum care facilities (36.4%), basic and standard care facilities (28.0%), as well as university facilities (23.4%). Routine antibiotic prophylaxis for every PEG/PEJ procedure is performed by 42.6%, whereas 13.9% do not apply antibiotic prophylaxis in general, and 23.8% only use it in patients with risk factors for infectious complications. This decision is based on in-house guidelines in 34.0% of participants or national recommendations 20.2%, whereas international guidelines (8.5%) and other recommendations play a minor role (4.3%). Although prophylactic antibiosis in PEG/PEJ placement is effective and recommended by current guidelines, less than half of the sites reported to routinely apply it. Given that these recommendations are based on outdated evidence, updated data is needed, and guideline recommendations need to be re-evaluated accordingly and fully implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":50089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2025.1.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ) tube placement are standard procedures for artificially administered nutrition support in malnourished patients. However, minor and major complications can occur. Peristomal infections are most common, potentially leading to severe inflammation, hospitalization, and PEG/PEJ removal. Antibiotic prophylaxis is effective in preventing peristomal infections and recommended by current guidelines but does not seem to be systematically used. The present study evaluated the implementation of prophylactic antibiosis in PEG/PEJ placement in clinical routine in Germany. A web-based survey was conducted among hospitals, ambulatory health care centers, and focus practice. In total, 107 participants have finalized the questionnaire. Most participants were from major regional and maximum care facilities (36.4%), basic and standard care facilities (28.0%), as well as university facilities (23.4%). Routine antibiotic prophylaxis for every PEG/PEJ procedure is performed by 42.6%, whereas 13.9% do not apply antibiotic prophylaxis in general, and 23.8% only use it in patients with risk factors for infectious complications. This decision is based on in-house guidelines in 34.0% of participants or national recommendations 20.2%, whereas international guidelines (8.5%) and other recommendations play a minor role (4.3%). Although prophylactic antibiosis in PEG/PEJ placement is effective and recommended by current guidelines, less than half of the sites reported to routinely apply it. Given that these recommendations are based on outdated evidence, updated data is needed, and guideline recommendations need to be re-evaluated accordingly and fully implemented.

经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)和经皮内镜空肠造口术(PEJ)置管是对营养不良患者进行人工营养支持的标准程序。然而,轻微和严重的并发症都有可能发生。肛周感染最为常见,可能导致严重炎症、住院和 PEG/PEJ 移除。抗生素预防可有效预防肛周感染,也是现行指南的推荐方法,但似乎并未得到系统使用。本研究评估了德国临床常规 PEG/PEJ 置入术中预防性抗生素的使用情况。我们在医院、非住院医疗中心和重点实践机构中开展了一项网络调查。共有 107 位参与者完成了问卷调查。大多数参与者来自大型地区和最高级别的医疗机构(36.4%)、基础和标准医疗机构(28.0%)以及大学医疗机构(23.4%)。42.6% 的参与者在每次 PEG/PEJ 手术中都进行常规抗生素预防,13.9% 的参与者在一般情况下不使用抗生素预防,23.8% 的参与者仅在有感染并发症风险因素的患者中使用。34.0%的参与者是根据内部指南或国家建议(20.2%)做出这一决定的,而国际指南(8.5%)和其他建议(4.3%)所起的作用较小。尽管在 PEG/PEJ 置入过程中使用预防性抗生素是有效的,而且也是当前指南所推荐的,但只有不到一半的医疗机构表示会常规使用。鉴于这些建议是基于过时的证据,因此需要更新数据,并对指南建议进行相应的重新评估和全面实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
22.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology publishes papers which fall within the range of basic and applied physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology. The papers should illustrate new physiological or pharmacological mechanisms at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs. Clinical studies, that are of fundamental importance and have a direct bearing on the pathophysiology will also be considered. Letters related to articles published in The Journal with topics of general professional interest are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信