Aidan Foley, Bianca Luna-Lupercio, Jessica M Capaldi, Galen Wiens-Cook, Vinicius Calsavara, Zulfikarali Surani, Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, Jane C Figueiredo, Robert Haile, Nenette A Cáceres, Celina H Shirazipour
{"title":"Examining Explicit Stereotype Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis in the Hispanic Community.","authors":"Aidan Foley, Bianca Luna-Lupercio, Jessica M Capaldi, Galen Wiens-Cook, Vinicius Calsavara, Zulfikarali Surani, Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, Jane C Figueiredo, Robert Haile, Nenette A Cáceres, Celina H Shirazipour","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02609-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer is a leading cause of death among Hispanic people in the USA. One potential reason is low adherence to cancer screening guidelines, particularly for colorectal cancer (CRC). Previous research suggests that low CRC screening may be linked to negative stereotypes associated with cancer and CRC screening methods. The purpose of this study was to examine explicit stereotype perceptions of CRC screening and diagnosis in the Hispanic community. Hispanic adults (n = 279) were asked to read three vignettes presenting a gender-neutral individual who was either diagnosed with CRC, completed colonoscopies for CRC screening, or was a control (no cancer information provided). Using the Stereotype Content Model approach, after reading each vignette, participants completed measures assessing explicit perceptions (warmth and competence) of the individual. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to evaluate differences in perceptions between vignettes. The main effect indicated no significant difference in warmth or competence perceptions based on vignette condition (p = .78). However, there was a significant difference in explicit perceptions based on the study participant's Hispanic heritage, gender, and age (ps < .05). Findings emphasize differences in explicit perceptions of cancer and cancer screening based on important demographic characteristics. Thus, important implications include the need for cancer educational materials and interventions to consider the important heterogeneity within the Hispanic community. Future CRC screening interventions should be tailored based on Hispanic heritage, gender, and age.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02609-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death among Hispanic people in the USA. One potential reason is low adherence to cancer screening guidelines, particularly for colorectal cancer (CRC). Previous research suggests that low CRC screening may be linked to negative stereotypes associated with cancer and CRC screening methods. The purpose of this study was to examine explicit stereotype perceptions of CRC screening and diagnosis in the Hispanic community. Hispanic adults (n = 279) were asked to read three vignettes presenting a gender-neutral individual who was either diagnosed with CRC, completed colonoscopies for CRC screening, or was a control (no cancer information provided). Using the Stereotype Content Model approach, after reading each vignette, participants completed measures assessing explicit perceptions (warmth and competence) of the individual. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to evaluate differences in perceptions between vignettes. The main effect indicated no significant difference in warmth or competence perceptions based on vignette condition (p = .78). However, there was a significant difference in explicit perceptions based on the study participant's Hispanic heritage, gender, and age (ps < .05). Findings emphasize differences in explicit perceptions of cancer and cancer screening based on important demographic characteristics. Thus, important implications include the need for cancer educational materials and interventions to consider the important heterogeneity within the Hispanic community. Future CRC screening interventions should be tailored based on Hispanic heritage, gender, and age.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.