Single-Disk's Plug-Based Embolization of Directional Branches During Urgent Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Paolo Bonanno, Simone Cuozzo, Federica Donato, Francesco Grasselli, Maria Concetta Gugliotta, Giulia Proietti Silvestri, Raimondo Micheli, Paolo Ottavi
{"title":"Single-Disk's Plug-Based Embolization of Directional Branches During Urgent Complex Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Paolo Bonanno, Simone Cuozzo, Federica Donato, Francesco Grasselli, Maria Concetta Gugliotta, Giulia Proietti Silvestri, Raimondo Micheli, Paolo Ottavi","doi":"10.1177/15266028251322704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The introduction of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranch stent-grafts represented an advancement in the endovascular treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs), particularly in urgent settings. In certain cases (e.g, target vessel [TV] occlusion), unused directional branches (DBs) require proper occlusion with a vascular plug to prevent type III endoleaks. However, no standardized technique for DB closure has been established. We aim to evaluate the safety, feasibility, time-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using single-disk vascular plug (Amplatzer Vascular Plug [AVP]) for DB closure during urgent branched endovascular aneurysm repair (B-EVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 16 patients (16/101, 15.8%) undergoing urgent B-EVAR with OTS devices requiring intentional occlusion of at least 1 DB using vascular plug due to unavailable TVs or anatomical constraints. Amplatzer Vascular Plugs were deployed in 2 different techniques: with or without DB elongation with balloon-expandable stent-grafts. Technical success, clinical outcomes, side branches plugging time, and plug-constrained length after its deployment were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Balloon-expandable stent-graft plus AVP were used to occlude 7 unused DBs (36.8%), whereas AVP without elongation was used in 8 (42.1%), with a median oversizing rate of 58.7%. The technical success rate was 100%, with no instances of plug migration or endoleak during a median follow-up of 20.9±14.4 months. Perioperative mortality rate was 25%, exclusively in patients with ruptured aneurysms. Clinical success was maintained in all patients, with no late reinterventions or DBs recanalization. Side-branch plugging time was significantly shorter when performed without elongation (3.9±0.6 vs. 6.4±1.3 minutes; <i>p</i>=.0003). Despite greater oversizing, even without elongation, the mean plug-constrained length (15.1±4.5 mm) did not exceed the shortest DB, effectively reducing the risk of complications associated with increased plug-constrained length while ensuring proper and secure deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-disk vascular plugs without DB elongation provide a safe, feasible, time-effective and cost-effective solution for DB closure during B-EVAR, with favorable outcomes and reduced procedural complexity, even in urgent setting. Multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized DB management techniques for challenging anatomical and urgent cases.Clinical ImpactOur study demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and time- and cost-effectiveness of single-disc vascular plug (AVP) embolization for directional branches during urgent or emergent branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using off-the-shelf devices, even without elongation using balloon-expandable stent-grafts. This technique simplifies the procedure, reducing complexity and potential complications. It is particularly advantageous in urgent scenarios, where minimizing procedural time is critical to improve patient outcomes and survival. Moreover, it offers significant benefits in resource-limited settings by ensuring efficient use of healthcare resources. Overall, this approach represents a practical, effective solution that can enhance procedural efficiency and broaden clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251322704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251322704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The introduction of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranch stent-grafts represented an advancement in the endovascular treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs), particularly in urgent settings. In certain cases (e.g, target vessel [TV] occlusion), unused directional branches (DBs) require proper occlusion with a vascular plug to prevent type III endoleaks. However, no standardized technique for DB closure has been established. We aim to evaluate the safety, feasibility, time-effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using single-disk vascular plug (Amplatzer Vascular Plug [AVP]) for DB closure during urgent branched endovascular aneurysm repair (B-EVAR).

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 16 patients (16/101, 15.8%) undergoing urgent B-EVAR with OTS devices requiring intentional occlusion of at least 1 DB using vascular plug due to unavailable TVs or anatomical constraints. Amplatzer Vascular Plugs were deployed in 2 different techniques: with or without DB elongation with balloon-expandable stent-grafts. Technical success, clinical outcomes, side branches plugging time, and plug-constrained length after its deployment were assessed.

Results: Balloon-expandable stent-graft plus AVP were used to occlude 7 unused DBs (36.8%), whereas AVP without elongation was used in 8 (42.1%), with a median oversizing rate of 58.7%. The technical success rate was 100%, with no instances of plug migration or endoleak during a median follow-up of 20.9±14.4 months. Perioperative mortality rate was 25%, exclusively in patients with ruptured aneurysms. Clinical success was maintained in all patients, with no late reinterventions or DBs recanalization. Side-branch plugging time was significantly shorter when performed without elongation (3.9±0.6 vs. 6.4±1.3 minutes; p=.0003). Despite greater oversizing, even without elongation, the mean plug-constrained length (15.1±4.5 mm) did not exceed the shortest DB, effectively reducing the risk of complications associated with increased plug-constrained length while ensuring proper and secure deployment.

Conclusions: Single-disk vascular plugs without DB elongation provide a safe, feasible, time-effective and cost-effective solution for DB closure during B-EVAR, with favorable outcomes and reduced procedural complexity, even in urgent setting. Multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized DB management techniques for challenging anatomical and urgent cases.Clinical ImpactOur study demonstrated the feasibility, safety, and time- and cost-effectiveness of single-disc vascular plug (AVP) embolization for directional branches during urgent or emergent branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using off-the-shelf devices, even without elongation using balloon-expandable stent-grafts. This technique simplifies the procedure, reducing complexity and potential complications. It is particularly advantageous in urgent scenarios, where minimizing procedural time is critical to improve patient outcomes and survival. Moreover, it offers significant benefits in resource-limited settings by ensuring efficient use of healthcare resources. Overall, this approach represents a practical, effective solution that can enhance procedural efficiency and broaden clinical applicability.

在紧急复杂的血管内主动脉瘤修补术中对定向分支进行基于单碟塞的栓塞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信