Raina Khan, Kristie J Sun, Morgan O'Connor, Jacqueline M Leung
{"title":"A Scoping Review on the Incidence of Nonoperating Room Anesthesia Safety Events.","authors":"Raina Khan, Kristie J Sun, Morgan O'Connor, Jacqueline M Leung","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the incidence of adverse and near-miss events in nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA); to identify study methodology, strength of findings, and knowledge gaps regarding these events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed between 2022 and 2023, surveying literature from 2006 to 2023. The included studies examined adults undergoing a NORA procedure. Excluded studies were in the intensive care unit, peripartum areas, the operating room, or pediatric only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 586 records were identified using the keywords: \"NORA,\" \"non-operating room anesthesia,\" \"anesthesia,\" \"adverse event,\" and \"near miss event.\" After screening, 58 full texts were reviewed and 12 studies were included. Five were retrospective observational, 4 were retrospective claims analyses, and 3 were surveys. Incidence rates of adverse events ranged from 0.01% to 38.6%, partially reflecting heterogeneity in event definition. Only one publication studied near-miss events: a retrospective survey of anesthesia providers. It described that near-miss events occurred more often but were reported less frequently than adverse events. A near-miss incidence rate could not be determined. Included articles were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations System criteria. The overall quality was low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited investigation regarding NORA safety events and a lack of high-quality prospective studies. Specific areas for future investigation include: (1) standardized definition and incidence of safety events; (2) specific study of near-miss events; (3) evidence-based recommendations to optimize safety. Considering the anticipated growth of procedures and heterogenous locations, our findings strongly suggest a dedicated study of NORA-specific safety concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"356-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the incidence of adverse and near-miss events in nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA); to identify study methodology, strength of findings, and knowledge gaps regarding these events.
Methods: A scoping review was performed between 2022 and 2023, surveying literature from 2006 to 2023. The included studies examined adults undergoing a NORA procedure. Excluded studies were in the intensive care unit, peripartum areas, the operating room, or pediatric only.
Results: A total of 586 records were identified using the keywords: "NORA," "non-operating room anesthesia," "anesthesia," "adverse event," and "near miss event." After screening, 58 full texts were reviewed and 12 studies were included. Five were retrospective observational, 4 were retrospective claims analyses, and 3 were surveys. Incidence rates of adverse events ranged from 0.01% to 38.6%, partially reflecting heterogeneity in event definition. Only one publication studied near-miss events: a retrospective survey of anesthesia providers. It described that near-miss events occurred more often but were reported less frequently than adverse events. A near-miss incidence rate could not be determined. Included articles were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations System criteria. The overall quality was low to moderate.
Conclusions: There is limited investigation regarding NORA safety events and a lack of high-quality prospective studies. Specific areas for future investigation include: (1) standardized definition and incidence of safety events; (2) specific study of near-miss events; (3) evidence-based recommendations to optimize safety. Considering the anticipated growth of procedures and heterogenous locations, our findings strongly suggest a dedicated study of NORA-specific safety concerns.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.