A Scoping Review on the Incidence of Nonoperating Room Anesthesia Safety Events.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001342
Raina Khan, Kristie J Sun, Morgan O'Connor, Jacqueline M Leung
{"title":"A Scoping Review on the Incidence of Nonoperating Room Anesthesia Safety Events.","authors":"Raina Khan, Kristie J Sun, Morgan O'Connor, Jacqueline M Leung","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the incidence of adverse and near-miss events in nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA); to identify study methodology, strength of findings, and knowledge gaps regarding these events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was performed between 2022 and 2023, surveying literature from 2006 to 2023. The included studies examined adults undergoing a NORA procedure. Excluded studies were in the intensive care unit, peripartum areas, the operating room, or pediatric only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 586 records were identified using the keywords: \"NORA,\" \"non-operating room anesthesia,\" \"anesthesia,\" \"adverse event,\" and \"near miss event.\" After screening, 58 full texts were reviewed and 12 studies were included. Five were retrospective observational, 4 were retrospective claims analyses, and 3 were surveys. Incidence rates of adverse events ranged from 0.01% to 38.6%, partially reflecting heterogeneity in event definition. Only one publication studied near-miss events: a retrospective survey of anesthesia providers. It described that near-miss events occurred more often but were reported less frequently than adverse events. A near-miss incidence rate could not be determined. Included articles were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations System criteria. The overall quality was low to moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited investigation regarding NORA safety events and a lack of high-quality prospective studies. Specific areas for future investigation include: (1) standardized definition and incidence of safety events; (2) specific study of near-miss events; (3) evidence-based recommendations to optimize safety. Considering the anticipated growth of procedures and heterogenous locations, our findings strongly suggest a dedicated study of NORA-specific safety concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":"356-363"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the incidence of adverse and near-miss events in nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA); to identify study methodology, strength of findings, and knowledge gaps regarding these events.

Methods: A scoping review was performed between 2022 and 2023, surveying literature from 2006 to 2023. The included studies examined adults undergoing a NORA procedure. Excluded studies were in the intensive care unit, peripartum areas, the operating room, or pediatric only.

Results: A total of 586 records were identified using the keywords: "NORA," "non-operating room anesthesia," "anesthesia," "adverse event," and "near miss event." After screening, 58 full texts were reviewed and 12 studies were included. Five were retrospective observational, 4 were retrospective claims analyses, and 3 were surveys. Incidence rates of adverse events ranged from 0.01% to 38.6%, partially reflecting heterogeneity in event definition. Only one publication studied near-miss events: a retrospective survey of anesthesia providers. It described that near-miss events occurred more often but were reported less frequently than adverse events. A near-miss incidence rate could not be determined. Included articles were assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations System criteria. The overall quality was low to moderate.

Conclusions: There is limited investigation regarding NORA safety events and a lack of high-quality prospective studies. Specific areas for future investigation include: (1) standardized definition and incidence of safety events; (2) specific study of near-miss events; (3) evidence-based recommendations to optimize safety. Considering the anticipated growth of procedures and heterogenous locations, our findings strongly suggest a dedicated study of NORA-specific safety concerns.

非手术室麻醉安全事件发生率的范围综述。
目的:了解非手术室麻醉不良事件和未遂事件的发生率;确定研究方法、研究结果的强度以及与这些事件相关的知识差距。方法:在2022 - 2023年间进行范围综述,调查2006 - 2023年的文献。纳入的研究调查了接受NORA手术的成年人。排除的研究是在重症监护病房,围生期区域,手术室,或儿科。结果:使用关键词:“NORA”、“非手术室麻醉”、“麻醉”、“不良事件”和“差点错过事件”,共识别了586条记录。筛选后,我们对58篇全文进行了回顾,并纳入了12项研究。回顾性观察法5例,回顾性索赔分析法4例,调查法3例。不良事件发生率从0.01%到38.6%不等,部分反映了事件定义的异质性。只有一份出版物研究了侥幸事件:对麻醉提供者的回顾性调查。它描述了未遂事件发生的频率更高,但报告的频率低于不良事件。侥幸发生率无法确定。采用建议分级、评估、发展和评估系统标准对纳入的文章进行评估。整体质量为低到中等。结论:关于NORA安全性事件的调查有限,缺乏高质量的前瞻性研究。未来调查的具体领域包括:(1)安全事件的标准化定义和发生率;(2)未遂事件的具体研究;(3)基于证据的安全优化建议。考虑到手术的预期增长和异质位置,我们的研究结果强烈建议对nora特异性安全问题进行专门研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信