The Fate of Cerebrospinal Fluid After Unrecognized Incidental Durotomy in Cervical Spine Surgery.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hyunik Cho, Young-Hyun Yoon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Ji-Won Kwon, Byung-Ho Lee, Namhoo Kim, Si-Young Park, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon
{"title":"The Fate of Cerebrospinal Fluid After Unrecognized Incidental Durotomy in Cervical Spine Surgery.","authors":"Hyunik Cho, Young-Hyun Yoon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Ji-Won Kwon, Byung-Ho Lee, Namhoo Kim, Si-Young Park, Hak-Sun Kim, Seong-Hwan Moon","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage due to incidental durotomy may not be recognized during cervical spine surgery. Thereafter large volume of CSF leakage may be found through inserted drainage.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the natural progress of large volume of CSF leakage after cervical spine surgery which were not managed by either revision surgery for dural repair or lumbar drainage.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>A total of 3215 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery by a single surgeon between 2015 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The volume of the leaked CSF was measured on the T2 sagittal MRI using PACS volume measuring tool. Spontaneous absorption rate of CSF at 6-month post-operative period was calculated for each patient.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For risk factor analysis, the incidence of unrecognized incidental durotomy was assessed according to types of surgery, revision surgery, presence of ligamentous ossification or smoking history. MRIs were taken in all 31 patients postoperatively and at 6 months follow up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total incidence of unrecognized incidental durotomy was 1.09% (31/2949). Posterior laminectomy and fusion had 2.14%, followed by open-door laminoplasty (1.41%), and anterior surgery (0.34%). Revision surgery had significantly higher incidence of CSF leakage (4.67%) compared to primary cases (0.95%). Patients with ligamentous ossification showed higher incidence of CSF leakage (5.57%) compared to the patients without it (0.48%). The average spontaneous absorption rate was 95.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leaked CSF was spontaneously absorbed within 6 months without any reoperation for dural repair or lumbar drainage. Risk factors for unrecognized incidental durotomy were posterior laminectomy and fusion, revision surgery, or existence of ligamentous ossification.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage due to incidental durotomy may not be recognized during cervical spine surgery. Thereafter large volume of CSF leakage may be found through inserted drainage.

Purpose: To examine the natural progress of large volume of CSF leakage after cervical spine surgery which were not managed by either revision surgery for dural repair or lumbar drainage.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: A total of 3215 patients who underwent cervical spine surgery by a single surgeon between 2015 to 2022.

Outcome measures: The volume of the leaked CSF was measured on the T2 sagittal MRI using PACS volume measuring tool. Spontaneous absorption rate of CSF at 6-month post-operative period was calculated for each patient.

Methods: For risk factor analysis, the incidence of unrecognized incidental durotomy was assessed according to types of surgery, revision surgery, presence of ligamentous ossification or smoking history. MRIs were taken in all 31 patients postoperatively and at 6 months follow up.

Results: The total incidence of unrecognized incidental durotomy was 1.09% (31/2949). Posterior laminectomy and fusion had 2.14%, followed by open-door laminoplasty (1.41%), and anterior surgery (0.34%). Revision surgery had significantly higher incidence of CSF leakage (4.67%) compared to primary cases (0.95%). Patients with ligamentous ossification showed higher incidence of CSF leakage (5.57%) compared to the patients without it (0.48%). The average spontaneous absorption rate was 95.0%.

Conclusion: Leaked CSF was spontaneously absorbed within 6 months without any reoperation for dural repair or lumbar drainage. Risk factors for unrecognized incidental durotomy were posterior laminectomy and fusion, revision surgery, or existence of ligamentous ossification.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信